• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • Anytime TD Picks
      • Anytime Touchdown Grades
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    Sitautional Capping 101

    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
    LeagueCapper
    Getty3
    idle_havoc
    SwishSwish1234
    phark
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 14703
    Posts: 93
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
     
    LeagueCapper
    LeagueCapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 9317
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:11 PM ET #26

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:



    It is relevant why?  Because YOU SAY SO?

    How many data points are in that 25 years of data?

    Do you know that Harvard has 10% more breakfast cheerios eaters than the general population.  If I eat cheerios, do I have a better chance of getting in to Harvard?

    Look - why wouldnt this apply to MLB, NBA, NCAAF, and NHL?  Why only NFL on Monday Night, not Thurs or Sun?  What defines a "west coast team"?  What defines an "east coast team"?

    Its a cute stat.  It really is - as you can see by all of the ball licking replies before I got here.  But it is a mindfuck.  Prove me wrong with real stats - and I will tell you that you are right.  But for now - with what you provided, it is nothing more than a cheerios stat.


    Wow, how you can relate this to that cheerios statement is unreal. Noone said this doesn't work for MLB, NHL, or any other sport and this trend definitely applies to SNF and TNF as well. All I provided was a small bit of information which you could apply in any sport. The fact that your saying you don't believe it and need to see more is admitting to the fact of how lazy you are. Why don't you research it? You wan't me to spoonfeed you everything? Take 30 minutes and do some research and see if you can't find any correlation, if you don't find anything i'll be happy to show you more proof through PM but your 100% wrong and i have plenty more proof of this applying to NFL as well as other sports/athletes
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:



    It is relevant why?  Because YOU SAY SO?

    How many data points are in that 25 years of data?

    Do you know that Harvard has 10% more breakfast cheerios eaters than the general population.  If I eat cheerios, do I have a better chance of getting in to Harvard?

    Look - why wouldnt this apply to MLB, NBA, NCAAF, and NHL?  Why only NFL on Monday Night, not Thurs or Sun?  What defines a "west coast team"?  What defines an "east coast team"?

    Its a cute stat.  It really is - as you can see by all of the ball licking replies before I got here.  But it is a mindfuck.  Prove me wrong with real stats - and I will tell you that you are right.  But for now - with what you provided, it is nothing more than a cheerios stat.


    Wow, how you can relate this to that cheerios statement is unreal. Noone said this doesn't work for MLB, NHL, or any other sport and this trend definitely applies to SNF and TNF as well. All I provided was a small bit of information which you could apply in any sport. The fact that your saying you don't believe it and need to see more is admitting to the fact of how lazy you are. Why don't you research it? You wan't me to spoonfeed you everything? Take 30 minutes and do some research and see if you can't find any correlation, if you don't find anything i'll be happy to show you more proof through PM but your 100% wrong and i have plenty more proof of this applying to NFL as well as other sports/athletes
     
    LeagueCapper
    LeagueCapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 9317
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:13 PM ET #27

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    And BTW - Im curious what you propose we do with this information - if even true.

    Do we blindly bet "the west coast team" when playing "an east coast team" on Monday night? 

    You make such a strong case in your original post that "this kind of handicapping is what the NFL is all about."  What if there is a 70% trend on the east coast team?  Which carries heavier weight?




    This has to do with the time zone. West coast teams are in the pacific time zones which is 3 hours earlier than east coast teams playing in the eastern time zone. If you think athletes playing at midnight are competing fairly with athletes competing at 9:00pm then I have nothing else to say to you
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    And BTW - Im curious what you propose we do with this information - if even true.

    Do we blindly bet "the west coast team" when playing "an east coast team" on Monday night? 

    You make such a strong case in your original post that "this kind of handicapping is what the NFL is all about."  What if there is a 70% trend on the east coast team?  Which carries heavier weight?




    This has to do with the time zone. West coast teams are in the pacific time zones which is 3 hours earlier than east coast teams playing in the eastern time zone. If you think athletes playing at midnight are competing fairly with athletes competing at 9:00pm then I have nothing else to say to you
     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:13 PM ET #28

    I'm going to propose an advertising campaign for General Mills that will imply that eating Cheerios makes you smarter. I could be sitting on a gold mine here thanks to you.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm going to propose an advertising campaign for General Mills that will imply that eating Cheerios makes you smarter. I could be sitting on a gold mine here thanks to you.
     
    idle_havoc
    idle_havoc
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 4515
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:15 PM ET #29

    definitely something I will keep in mind 
    TY
    Gotta go pee!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    definitely something I will keep in mind 
    TY
     
    SwishSwish1234
    SwishSwish1234
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2011
    Posts: 3173
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:16 PM ET #30

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    Wow, how you can relate this to that cheerios statement is unreal. Noone said this doesn't work for MLB, NHL, or any other sport and this trend definitely applies to SNF and TNF as well. All I provided was a small bit of information which you could apply in any sport. The fact that your saying you don't believe it and need to see more is admitting to the fact of how lazy you are. Why don't you research it? You wan't me to spoonfeed you everything? Take 30 minutes and do some research and see if you can't find any correlation, if you don't find anything i'll be happy to show you more proof through PM but your 100% wrong and i have plenty more proof of this applying to NFL as well as other sports/athletes

    Why should he research it when you're the bearer of good news telling us how the trend hits at 65 % +, He is asking you to provide more info on the subject other than telling us what the actual trend is, Why does this trend work, What's the reasoning behind it working?? It's your thread not his, It's your duty to back up what you said not his. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    Wow, how you can relate this to that cheerios statement is unreal. Noone said this doesn't work for MLB, NHL, or any other sport and this trend definitely applies to SNF and TNF as well. All I provided was a small bit of information which you could apply in any sport. The fact that your saying you don't believe it and need to see more is admitting to the fact of how lazy you are. Why don't you research it? You wan't me to spoonfeed you everything? Take 30 minutes and do some research and see if you can't find any correlation, if you don't find anything i'll be happy to show you more proof through PM but your 100% wrong and i have plenty more proof of this applying to NFL as well as other sports/athletes

    Why should he research it when you're the bearer of good news telling us how the trend hits at 65 % +, He is asking you to provide more info on the subject other than telling us what the actual trend is, Why does this trend work, What's the reasoning behind it working?? It's your thread not his, It's your duty to back up what you said not his. 
     
    phark
    phark
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2002
    Posts: 5187
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:18 PM ET #31

    I kind of agree with Vanzack, I am not sure I am drinking the Kool aid on this one. You can find trends that can back up anything. Things I like to factor are :

    -Teams coming off emotional wins, (Seattle Last week)- Yes I bet the Rams

    -Teams playing with Revenge or Double Revenge

    -Trap games etc...

     

    GL though

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I kind of agree with Vanzack, I am not sure I am drinking the Kool aid on this one. You can find trends that can back up anything. Things I like to factor are :

    -Teams coming off emotional wins, (Seattle Last week)- Yes I bet the Rams

    -Teams playing with Revenge or Double Revenge

    -Trap games etc...

     

    GL though

     
    LeagueCapper
    LeagueCapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 9317
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:19 PM ET #32

    Quote Originally Posted by SwishSwish1234:


    Why should he research it when you're the bearer of good news telling us how the trend hits at 65 % +, He is asking you to provide more info on the subject other than telling us what the actual trend is, Why does this trend work, What's the reasoning behind it working?? It's your thread not his, It's your duty to back up what you said not his. 


    I did back up what I said. I backed it up completely about how it worked in the NFL and provided statistics and proof. He brought up other sports of which I told him to research. I brought up nothing about other sports in my first post so I have no justification to need to prove this (although it does apply to other sports as well)
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by SwishSwish1234:


    Why should he research it when you're the bearer of good news telling us how the trend hits at 65 % +, He is asking you to provide more info on the subject other than telling us what the actual trend is, Why does this trend work, What's the reasoning behind it working?? It's your thread not his, It's your duty to back up what you said not his. 


    I did back up what I said. I backed it up completely about how it worked in the NFL and provided statistics and proof. He brought up other sports of which I told him to research. I brought up nothing about other sports in my first post so I have no justification to need to prove this (although it does apply to other sports as well)
     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:19 PM ET #33

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    Wow, how you can relate this to that cheerios statement is unreal. Noone said this doesn't work for MLB, NHL, or any other sport and this trend definitely applies to SNF and TNF as well. All I provided was a small bit of information which you could apply in any sport. The fact that your saying you don't believe it and need to see more is admitting to the fact of how lazy you are. Why don't you research it? You wan't me to spoonfeed you everything? Take 30 minutes and do some research and see if you can't find any correlation, if you don't find anything i'll be happy to show you more proof through PM but your 100% wrong and i have plenty more proof of this applying to NFL as well as other sports/athletes


    Why would I need to even research it? 

    You say it "definitely applies to SNF and TNF as well".

    Thats enough for me!!


    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    Wow, how you can relate this to that cheerios statement is unreal. Noone said this doesn't work for MLB, NHL, or any other sport and this trend definitely applies to SNF and TNF as well. All I provided was a small bit of information which you could apply in any sport. The fact that your saying you don't believe it and need to see more is admitting to the fact of how lazy you are. Why don't you research it? You wan't me to spoonfeed you everything? Take 30 minutes and do some research and see if you can't find any correlation, if you don't find anything i'll be happy to show you more proof through PM but your 100% wrong and i have plenty more proof of this applying to NFL as well as other sports/athletes


    Why would I need to even research it? 

    You say it "definitely applies to SNF and TNF as well".

    Thats enough for me!!


     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:23 PM ET #34

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    This has to do with the time zone. West coast teams are in the pacific time zones which is 3 hours earlier than east coast teams playing in the eastern time zone. If you think athletes playing at midnight are competing fairly with athletes competing at 9:00pm then I have nothing else to say to you


    OK, so west coast teams are defined by time zone.  Is Arizona west coast?  I think they dont practice daylight savings.....

    But what about the line used for determining the ATS winner?  Is that the closing line?  Opening line?  Which book is the official number?

    How many times over the past 25 years has this actually happened?

    And on and on and on.  So far you would fail a middle school stats course.  Prove me wrong.  Please.  Im serious.  I am ready and more than willing to say I was wrong.

    The reason I post this is not to pick a fight.  I am actually generally curious to the point of obsessed about learning new things like this.  The problem is - 99% of them dont pan out.  But I keep searching for a nugget in the stream.  And sometimes I get them here.  So please, show me this is true....


    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    This has to do with the time zone. West coast teams are in the pacific time zones which is 3 hours earlier than east coast teams playing in the eastern time zone. If you think athletes playing at midnight are competing fairly with athletes competing at 9:00pm then I have nothing else to say to you


    OK, so west coast teams are defined by time zone.  Is Arizona west coast?  I think they dont practice daylight savings.....

    But what about the line used for determining the ATS winner?  Is that the closing line?  Opening line?  Which book is the official number?

    How many times over the past 25 years has this actually happened?

    And on and on and on.  So far you would fail a middle school stats course.  Prove me wrong.  Please.  Im serious.  I am ready and more than willing to say I was wrong.

    The reason I post this is not to pick a fight.  I am actually generally curious to the point of obsessed about learning new things like this.  The problem is - 99% of them dont pan out.  But I keep searching for a nugget in the stream.  And sometimes I get them here.  So please, show me this is true....


     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:24 PM ET #35

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    I did back up what I said. I backed it up completely about how it worked in the NFL and provided statistics and proof. He brought up other sports of which I told him to research. I brought up nothing about other sports in my first post so I have no justification to need to prove this (although it does apply to other sports as well)


    At a bare minimum - to even begin to have any credibility - you must source your data that you quote.

    Just tell us the games you reference, and the lines associated with them.  That way - we have a starting point.


    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    I did back up what I said. I backed it up completely about how it worked in the NFL and provided statistics and proof. He brought up other sports of which I told him to research. I brought up nothing about other sports in my first post so I have no justification to need to prove this (although it does apply to other sports as well)


    At a bare minimum - to even begin to have any credibility - you must source your data that you quote.

    Just tell us the games you reference, and the lines associated with them.  That way - we have a starting point.


     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:28 PM ET #36

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    And BTW - Im curious what you propose we do with this information - if even true.

    Do we blindly bet "the west coast team" when playing "an east coast team" on Monday night? 

    You make such a strong case in your original post that "this kind of handicapping is what the NFL is all about."  What if there is a 70% trend on the east coast team?  Which carries heavier weight?




    The above is a very important question for you.

    I would like it if you would attempt to answer completely.

    I am always curious how a trend bettor deals with this issue.  Are there some trends that are more important than others?

    This is a real question. I am genuinely curious about how you handle this problem.


    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    And BTW - Im curious what you propose we do with this information - if even true.

    Do we blindly bet "the west coast team" when playing "an east coast team" on Monday night? 

    You make such a strong case in your original post that "this kind of handicapping is what the NFL is all about."  What if there is a 70% trend on the east coast team?  Which carries heavier weight?




    The above is a very important question for you.

    I would like it if you would attempt to answer completely.

    I am always curious how a trend bettor deals with this issue.  Are there some trends that are more important than others?

    This is a real question. I am genuinely curious about how you handle this problem.


     
    halofan
    halofan
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2012
    Posts: 2952
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:29 PM ET #37

    Me too
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Me too
     
    LeagueCapper
    LeagueCapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 9317
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:30 PM ET #38

    Vanzack, if you simply asked for proof without attacking me I would have provided it for you without all this mess. There was a very famous study at Stanford done discussing circadian rhythms in sports.

    "The scheduling of Monday Night Football games presents a unique circadian problem, especially if a team from the West Coast is playing a team from the East Coast. Players on the West Coast team are playing at their equivalent of 5:30 p.m., no matter if the game is in Seattle or Miami. Players on the team from the East Coast, meanwhile, are three hours ahead in their own circadian cycles. In nature, this sort of mismatch couldn't happen. It was only in the last 60 years or so that we've developed a way to travel so quickly across time zones that our internal clocks are no longer in sync with the daylight around us. Fitting its cause, we call this condition jet lag.

    Without knowing it, athletes on teams from the East Coast are playing at a disadvantage. Because of the circadian rhythm, which they can't control, their bodies are past their natural performance peaks before the first quarter ends. By the fourth quarter, the team from the East Coast will be competing close to its equivalent of midnight. Their bodies will be subtly preparing for sleep by taking steps such as lowering the body temperature, slowing the reaction time, and increasing the amount of melatonin in their bloodstream. Athletes on the team from the West Coast, meanwhile, are still competing in the prime time of their circadian cycle.

    Every human body, ranging from a professional athlete to a suburban dad, will experience small declines in physical ability and mental agility the longer it fights against the circadian rhythm. In the modern NFL, this has a significant impact because teams in the league are more evenly matched than those in the other major sports, and anything that alters a single player's ability has an outsized effect on the outcome of the game. What's more, there is little that an East Coast team can do about the circadian disadvantage. The schedule gives coaches few chances to adapt to the time difference. Teams traveling on the road typically fly in the night before the game, and East Coast teams playing at home rarely attempt to put their body clocks on Pacific Standard Time. Coaches instead tell their players not to try to adjust to the time differences, preferring that they keep up with their normal sleep patterns for consistency.

    The Stanford researchers dug through 25 years of Monday night NFL games and flagged every time a West Coast team played an East Coast team. Then, in an inspired move, they compared the final scores for each game with the point spread developed by bookmakers in Vegas. The results were stunning. The West Coast teams dominated their East Coast opponents no matter where they played. A West Coast team won 63 percent of the time, by an average of two touchdowns. The games were much closer when an East Coast team won, with an average margin of victory of only nine points. By picking the West Coast team every time, someone would have beaten the point spread 70 percent of the time. For gamblers in Las Vegas, the matchup was as good as found money.

    In a test to ensure that their findings weren't the result of West Coast teams simply being better during those years, the researchers expanded their scope and looked at every Monday Night Football game played during that twenty-five-year time span. They found that the overall winning percentages for West Coast and East Coast teams were essentially even when the teams were not playing a game against an opponent from the other coast. Nor were the results a reflection of home-field advantage. When an East Coast team traveled to another destination within its same time zone, it won 45 percent of the time. But if a team from the East Coast played somewhere in the Pacific time zone, its winning percentage shrunk to only 29 percent.

    The circadian advantage—or disadvantage, depending on your perspective–-popped up in studies of figure skaters, rowers, golfers, baseball players, swimmers, and divers. Everywhere you turned, there was evidence of the body's hidden rhythms at work. One study found that in sports as varied as running, weightlifting, and swimming, athletes competing when their bodies experienced the second boost of circadian energy were more likely to break a world record. Long jumpers, for instance, launched themselves nearly 4 percent farther when the body was at its circadian peak. But the circadian rhythm cut both ways. Athletes competing when their circadian rhythm corresponded to the so-called sleep gates—those times in the early afternoon or late nights when it's easy for most people to fall asleep—consistently performed a little worse than normal, even if the slowdown wasn't obvious to them.


    https://deadspin.com/5934440/the-circadian-advantage-how-sleep-patterns-benefit-certain-nfl-teams

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Vanzack, if you simply asked for proof without attacking me I would have provided it for you without all this mess. There was a very famous study at Stanford done discussing circadian rhythms in sports.

    "The scheduling of Monday Night Football games presents a unique circadian problem, especially if a team from the West Coast is playing a team from the East Coast. Players on the West Coast team are playing at their equivalent of 5:30 p.m., no matter if the game is in Seattle or Miami. Players on the team from the East Coast, meanwhile, are three hours ahead in their own circadian cycles. In nature, this sort of mismatch couldn't happen. It was only in the last 60 years or so that we've developed a way to travel so quickly across time zones that our internal clocks are no longer in sync with the daylight around us. Fitting its cause, we call this condition jet lag.

    Without knowing it, athletes on teams from the East Coast are playing at a disadvantage. Because of the circadian rhythm, which they can't control, their bodies are past their natural performance peaks before the first quarter ends. By the fourth quarter, the team from the East Coast will be competing close to its equivalent of midnight. Their bodies will be subtly preparing for sleep by taking steps such as lowering the body temperature, slowing the reaction time, and increasing the amount of melatonin in their bloodstream. Athletes on the team from the West Coast, meanwhile, are still competing in the prime time of their circadian cycle.

    Every human body, ranging from a professional athlete to a suburban dad, will experience small declines in physical ability and mental agility the longer it fights against the circadian rhythm. In the modern NFL, this has a significant impact because teams in the league are more evenly matched than those in the other major sports, and anything that alters a single player's ability has an outsized effect on the outcome of the game. What's more, there is little that an East Coast team can do about the circadian disadvantage. The schedule gives coaches few chances to adapt to the time difference. Teams traveling on the road typically fly in the night before the game, and East Coast teams playing at home rarely attempt to put their body clocks on Pacific Standard Time. Coaches instead tell their players not to try to adjust to the time differences, preferring that they keep up with their normal sleep patterns for consistency.

    The Stanford researchers dug through 25 years of Monday night NFL games and flagged every time a West Coast team played an East Coast team. Then, in an inspired move, they compared the final scores for each game with the point spread developed by bookmakers in Vegas. The results were stunning. The West Coast teams dominated their East Coast opponents no matter where they played. A West Coast team won 63 percent of the time, by an average of two touchdowns. The games were much closer when an East Coast team won, with an average margin of victory of only nine points. By picking the West Coast team every time, someone would have beaten the point spread 70 percent of the time. For gamblers in Las Vegas, the matchup was as good as found money.

    In a test to ensure that their findings weren't the result of West Coast teams simply being better during those years, the researchers expanded their scope and looked at every Monday Night Football game played during that twenty-five-year time span. They found that the overall winning percentages for West Coast and East Coast teams were essentially even when the teams were not playing a game against an opponent from the other coast. Nor were the results a reflection of home-field advantage. When an East Coast team traveled to another destination within its same time zone, it won 45 percent of the time. But if a team from the East Coast played somewhere in the Pacific time zone, its winning percentage shrunk to only 29 percent.

    The circadian advantage—or disadvantage, depending on your perspective–-popped up in studies of figure skaters, rowers, golfers, baseball players, swimmers, and divers. Everywhere you turned, there was evidence of the body's hidden rhythms at work. One study found that in sports as varied as running, weightlifting, and swimming, athletes competing when their bodies experienced the second boost of circadian energy were more likely to break a world record. Long jumpers, for instance, launched themselves nearly 4 percent farther when the body was at its circadian peak. But the circadian rhythm cut both ways. Athletes competing when their circadian rhythm corresponded to the so-called sleep gates—those times in the early afternoon or late nights when it's easy for most people to fall asleep—consistently performed a little worse than normal, even if the slowdown wasn't obvious to them.


    https://deadspin.com/5934440/the-circadian-advantage-how-sleep-patterns-benefit-certain-nfl-teams

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:38 PM ET #39

    Alright!!

    Now we are talking.  Thanks for the link and the info.

    I still have questions about the vague nature of the article and the stats, but that doesnt diminish my conceding that this is what I asked for. 

    My supposition is that this is a stat used to sell a book (at the end of the article).  And my supposition is that this is still not causation - and if it was - what should we do with it - but you did provide what seems like a reputable source - and for that-  you are ahead of 99% of the stat posters on here (pun intended).

    It would have been nice if you sourced the article in the first post instead of trying to make it look like your own work - but hey - that is probably nitpicky.


    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Alright!!

    Now we are talking.  Thanks for the link and the info.

    I still have questions about the vague nature of the article and the stats, but that doesnt diminish my conceding that this is what I asked for. 

    My supposition is that this is a stat used to sell a book (at the end of the article).  And my supposition is that this is still not causation - and if it was - what should we do with it - but you did provide what seems like a reputable source - and for that-  you are ahead of 99% of the stat posters on here (pun intended).

    It would have been nice if you sourced the article in the first post instead of trying to make it look like your own work - but hey - that is probably nitpicky.


     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:39 PM ET #40

    And I would still love to hear your response to post #36.

    I am genuinely confused by it.  Never understood it.  Hoping you can clarify.


    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    And I would still love to hear your response to post #36.

    I am genuinely confused by it.  Never understood it.  Hoping you can clarify.


     
    LeagueCapper
    LeagueCapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 9317
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:48 PM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    And I would still love to hear your response to post #36.

    I am genuinely confused by it.  Never understood it.  Hoping you can clarify.




    There are a lot of trends that are simply nonsense and they are obvious when you first hear them. But there are others that are credible if they are relevant. So my answer would be it all depends on the 70% trend on the east coast team you have but like I said, I discredit 90% of the trends I hear about. It's that other 10% relevant trends backed up by relevant history which are money
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    And I would still love to hear your response to post #36.

    I am genuinely confused by it.  Never understood it.  Hoping you can clarify.




    There are a lot of trends that are simply nonsense and they are obvious when you first hear them. But there are others that are credible if they are relevant. So my answer would be it all depends on the 70% trend on the east coast team you have but like I said, I discredit 90% of the trends I hear about. It's that other 10% relevant trends backed up by relevant history which are money
     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 2:53 PM ET #42

    The following is your conclusion in your first post.....

    Find situations, spots, and trends to support your capping.

    BOTH sides in EVERY SINGLE GAME could apply to this.  You can always find situation, spots, and trends to support BOTH teams.  How do we know which situations, spots, and trends are the important ones?  Which ones do we weigh higher than others?

    Capping off eye tests and what you think is the better team will never allow you to break into the great capper you can be. Finding quality trends and situations can allow you to be a 70% capper,  something you will never hit picking teams by who you think will cover.

    No chance.  Period.  70% is unattainable and silly.  Forget it.  Total joke.

     The trend I gave you above is hitting 70% over the past 25 years ATS, think about what it's hitting at if you just chose the team 2nd half or 4th quarter?

    Pure speculation.  But if this is causation, it would reason to be true.  I would love to hear this stat, and it would further bolster your position if it is true.


    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The following is your conclusion in your first post.....

    Find situations, spots, and trends to support your capping.

    BOTH sides in EVERY SINGLE GAME could apply to this.  You can always find situation, spots, and trends to support BOTH teams.  How do we know which situations, spots, and trends are the important ones?  Which ones do we weigh higher than others?

    Capping off eye tests and what you think is the better team will never allow you to break into the great capper you can be. Finding quality trends and situations can allow you to be a 70% capper,  something you will never hit picking teams by who you think will cover.

    No chance.  Period.  70% is unattainable and silly.  Forget it.  Total joke.

     The trend I gave you above is hitting 70% over the past 25 years ATS, think about what it's hitting at if you just chose the team 2nd half or 4th quarter?

    Pure speculation.  But if this is causation, it would reason to be true.  I would love to hear this stat, and it would further bolster your position if it is true.


     
    LeagueCapper
    LeagueCapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 9317
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 3:00 PM ET #43

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    The following is your conclusion in your first post.....

    Find situations, spots, and trends to support your capping.

    BOTH sides in EVERY SINGLE GAME could apply to this.  You can always find situation, spots, and trends to support BOTH teams.  How do we know which situations, spots, and trends are the important ones?  Which ones do we weigh higher than others?

    Capping off eye tests and what you think is the better team will never allow you to break into the great capper you can be. Finding quality trends and situations can allow you to be a 70% capper,  something you will never hit picking teams by who you think will cover.

    No chance.  Period.  70% is unattainable and silly.  Forget it.  Total joke.

     The trend I gave you above is hitting 70% over the past 25 years ATS, think about what it's hitting at if you just chose the team 2nd half or 4th quarter?

    Pure speculation.  But if this is causation, it would reason to be true.  I would love to hear this stat, and it would further bolster your position if it is true.




    I'm done having this conversation with you. It seems your not satisfied with any response I give. If you saw my game of the week last week I had a trend that was 19-0 ATS and 19-0 SU (even underdogs) all time and it won once again. If you want to think trends are meaningless and that they can be applied to both teams then so be it.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    The following is your conclusion in your first post.....

    Find situations, spots, and trends to support your capping.

    BOTH sides in EVERY SINGLE GAME could apply to this.  You can always find situation, spots, and trends to support BOTH teams.  How do we know which situations, spots, and trends are the important ones?  Which ones do we weigh higher than others?

    Capping off eye tests and what you think is the better team will never allow you to break into the great capper you can be. Finding quality trends and situations can allow you to be a 70% capper,  something you will never hit picking teams by who you think will cover.

    No chance.  Period.  70% is unattainable and silly.  Forget it.  Total joke.

     The trend I gave you above is hitting 70% over the past 25 years ATS, think about what it's hitting at if you just chose the team 2nd half or 4th quarter?

    Pure speculation.  But if this is causation, it would reason to be true.  I would love to hear this stat, and it would further bolster your position if it is true.




    I'm done having this conversation with you. It seems your not satisfied with any response I give. If you saw my game of the week last week I had a trend that was 19-0 ATS and 19-0 SU (even underdogs) all time and it won once again. If you want to think trends are meaningless and that they can be applied to both teams then so be it.
     
    Alldaygambler28
    Alldaygambler28
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 1456
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 3:01 PM ET #44

    I don't understand the difficulty in thinking athletes will perform worse when there body is more tired.  I know I don't like working out at night after a long day of working and sitting on a computer.  My performance is way worse than working out earlier in the day.

    To go further, I have better workouts when I have proper nutrition prior.  So a guy can laugh at the Cheerios thing all they want, but it is pretty obvious athletes compete better with better nutrition. 

    You see it all the time.  Teams have their "routine" interrupted or changed.  It usually doesn't work out well.  The Niners have been staying on the East Coast the last 2 years on b2b road games in the east time zone.  I guess it is a coincidence that they have been awesome under Harbaugh with eastern games under his tenure, but sucked prior to him there.  As another example, as a Viking fan, when the Metrodump roof collapsed, their whole routine was thrown off and they had to play a home game in Detroit at Ford Field.  They got thumped by the Gmen. 

    Obviously, many times teams overcome obstacles like this, but their is a correlation to all this which provides a logical trend that can result in a guy profitting more than not.  This is useful information. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I don't understand the difficulty in thinking athletes will perform worse when there body is more tired.  I know I don't like working out at night after a long day of working and sitting on a computer.  My performance is way worse than working out earlier in the day.

    To go further, I have better workouts when I have proper nutrition prior.  So a guy can laugh at the Cheerios thing all they want, but it is pretty obvious athletes compete better with better nutrition. 

    You see it all the time.  Teams have their "routine" interrupted or changed.  It usually doesn't work out well.  The Niners have been staying on the East Coast the last 2 years on b2b road games in the east time zone.  I guess it is a coincidence that they have been awesome under Harbaugh with eastern games under his tenure, but sucked prior to him there.  As another example, as a Viking fan, when the Metrodump roof collapsed, their whole routine was thrown off and they had to play a home game in Detroit at Ford Field.  They got thumped by the Gmen. 

    Obviously, many times teams overcome obstacles like this, but their is a correlation to all this which provides a logical trend that can result in a guy profitting more than not.  This is useful information. 
     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 3:05 PM ET #45

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    I'm done having this conversation with you. It seems your not satisfied with any response I give. If you saw my game of the week last week I had a trend that was 19-0 ATS and 19-0 SU (even underdogs) all time and it won once again. If you want to think trends are meaningless and that they can be applied to both teams then so be it.

    Wow.  I thought we were getting somewhwere.  Why take it so personally?  Just having a back and forth convo.

    And no, Im not satisfied with someone saying they can cap at 70%, or that it is even possible.

    Jeesh.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:



    I'm done having this conversation with you. It seems your not satisfied with any response I give. If you saw my game of the week last week I had a trend that was 19-0 ATS and 19-0 SU (even underdogs) all time and it won once again. If you want to think trends are meaningless and that they can be applied to both teams then so be it.

    Wow.  I thought we were getting somewhwere.  Why take it so personally?  Just having a back and forth convo.

    And no, Im not satisfied with someone saying they can cap at 70%, or that it is even possible.

    Jeesh.

     
    ninefine
    ninefine
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 567
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 4:00 PM ET #46

    does anyone know of a site that goes back 25 years in terms of betting lines?  I assume the tracking of lines was not as good 25 years ago as it is today.  I would be willing to vet this trend if someone knows where you can get the data.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    does anyone know of a site that goes back 25 years in terms of betting lines?  I assume the tracking of lines was not as good 25 years ago as it is today.  I would be willing to vet this trend if someone knows where you can get the data.  
     
    ninefine
    ninefine
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 567
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 4:40 PM ET #47

    So looking back over 10 seasons of data for MNF only... There were no games that fit this trend in 2010, 2009, 2007 or 2004.  The trend is 7 - 3 SU.  I didn't have time to look at the spreads for the games so not sure of the ATS record.  10 games over 10 seasons seems like too small of a sample size.  It would be interesting to add in all the night games as well, SNF, Thursday and those random times they play on Sat night.   

    2011:
    Dec 5_SD 38 - JAC 14
    Dec 19_SF 20 - PIT 3

    2008:
    Sep 22_SD 48 - NYJ 29

    2006:
    Oct 9_DEN 13 - BAL 3

    2005:
    OCT 10_PIT 24 - SD 22
    DEC 5_SEA 42 - PHI 0

    2003:
    OCT 27_MIA 26 - SD 10
    NOV 17_SF 30 - PIT 14

    2002:
    NOV 25_PHI 38 -SF 17
    DEC 2_OAK 26 - NYJ 20


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    So looking back over 10 seasons of data for MNF only... There were no games that fit this trend in 2010, 2009, 2007 or 2004.  The trend is 7 - 3 SU.  I didn't have time to look at the spreads for the games so not sure of the ATS record.  10 games over 10 seasons seems like too small of a sample size.  It would be interesting to add in all the night games as well, SNF, Thursday and those random times they play on Sat night.   

    2011:
    Dec 5_SD 38 - JAC 14
    Dec 19_SF 20 - PIT 3

    2008:
    Sep 22_SD 48 - NYJ 29

    2006:
    Oct 9_DEN 13 - BAL 3

    2005:
    OCT 10_PIT 24 - SD 22
    DEC 5_SEA 42 - PHI 0

    2003:
    OCT 27_MIA 26 - SD 10
    NOV 17_SF 30 - PIT 14

    2002:
    NOV 25_PHI 38 -SF 17
    DEC 2_OAK 26 - NYJ 20


     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 4:54 PM ET #48

    Well, there is your 70% (7-3).

    10 games over 10 seasons.   Jeesh.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Well, there is your 70% (7-3).

    10 games over 10 seasons.   Jeesh.

     
    ninefine
    ninefine
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 567
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 5:13 PM ET #49

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    Well, there is your 70% (7-3).

    10 games over 10 seasons.   Jeesh.


    Very small sample size.  It is weird that I came up with exactly the number they quoted over the past 25 years for the past 10.  Makes you wonder if the authors were lazy and just went back 10 years but called it 25 to improve their stance.  Not sure if truly going back 25 years even improves their stance, still a small data sample, 25 games over 25 years (if the 10 games over 10 years is pretty much the average).  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    Well, there is your 70% (7-3).

    10 games over 10 seasons.   Jeesh.


    Very small sample size.  It is weird that I came up with exactly the number they quoted over the past 25 years for the past 10.  Makes you wonder if the authors were lazy and just went back 10 years but called it 25 to improve their stance.  Not sure if truly going back 25 years even improves their stance, still a small data sample, 25 games over 25 years (if the 10 games over 10 years is pretty much the average).  
     
     
    gary69
    gary69
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2011
    Posts: 265
    Posted: Oct. 1, 2012 - 8:01 PM ET #50

    Very Interesting. Keep up the good work Capper. It's appreciated.  Vanzack instead of  arguing show proof that the trend is wrong, whats the big deal , handicapers need and use any and all information to come to a conclusion. Just my 2 cents worth " PEACE" 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Very Interesting. Keep up the good work Capper. It's appreciated.  Vanzack instead of  arguing show proof that the trend is wrong, whats the big deal , handicapers need and use any and all information to come to a conclusion. Just my 2 cents worth " PEACE" 
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 446,774 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/12/2026 804 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 256,512 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,123 Covers arrow
    • 9/12 🔥🔥?????? 3,634 Covers arrow
    • Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System? 27,874 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,332 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 12, 2026 * NCAAF * Week #2 * College Football Plays*** 4,080 Covers arrow
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 11,288 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 18,923 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.