All Forums | NFL Betting

SOMEBODY PLEASE GIVE ME ONE GOOD REASON TO......

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13810
Posts: 95
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1808
Posted: #51
it's not the pick that is worrisome (i love large home dogs myself) but it's betting half of your bankroll that's the problem.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 7741
Posted: #52
razor don't do it because when you cross that line. even if you win it's still a bad beat why like I said because you will do it again and again.until 1 game it's not going to work out but do as you like it's your money gl 
Dilaudid8
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 15595
Posted: #53

And to all the morons who said Jets suck....I beg to differ. They are a professional team, capable of winning any game, including the superbowl. If you don't think so, then you don't know how sports works..

 

thanks for the laugh I need it this afternoon

 

how is anyone suppose to take that statement seriously really superbowl ..... Jets cant win the Orange bowl right now

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 7741
Posted: #54
sorry I was saying bet not beat. it's a bad bet
Dilaudid8
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 15595
Posted: #55

it's not the pick that is worrisome (i love large home dogs myself) but it's betting half of your bankroll that's the problem.

 

Agree with clubtnt, you want to bet the Jets go for it ... who the fuck know ... strange things can happen but to bet half you bank roll is nuts ... that def is the problem ... this game is no more then a small unit bet if you bet the jets

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 268
Posted: #56
There is nothing wrong with the Jets pick, it could happen, +9 on the back door cover could happen, what I question is risking half your bankroll??? I've had an eye on your threads since you were betting the NFL preseason(would have killed it if it wasn't for the mooses) you talked about money management and how it's a long season. Don't fall off the wagon and try to chase, your hit a rough weekend or two, but you got a lot more games to go, stay true to your game plan bro
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 15595
Posted: #57

I'm not that kind of guy. 

 

Just curious what kind of guy are you? Die to know where in the Jets against the Texans you find value .... Special Teams? what the #? Let me know where ? I would love the insight

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 6378
Posted: #58

not really but if you say so  I have been know to be wrong we will find out ... but ill bet you wont be betting the jets cause im sure you will find a better game ... but we will see .. If Im wrong ill be the first one to come in here and say i was wrong .... doubt it



1. You already lost that bet sir.


2.  Not necessary. 
Let's go Darwin
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 268
Posted: #59

Teaser78

"it's not the pick that is worrisome (i love large home dogs myself) but it's betting half of your bankroll that's the problem.

Agree with clubtnt, you want to bet the Jets go for it ... who the fuck know ... strange things can happen but to bet half you bank roll is nuts ... that def is the problem ... this game is no more then a small unit bet if you bet the jets"

 

17 seconds really??? lol but good point

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 4106
Posted: #60

Somebody save me from myself.

I'll give it a shot ...A fool and his money are soon parted

 

jets stink...and I'm from NY

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 351
Posted: #61
As several have already stated...it's not the play on the jets that's a bad idea, it is risking so much on them.  They are worthy of a standard play at +9 and perhaps a sprinkle on the money line at more than a 2.5:1 payout.  Yes everyone sees this from a match up on paper perspective as a one sided blow out, which it is, but situationally the Jets are in a nice spot. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 2685
Posted: #62

And to all the morons who said Jets suck....I beg to differ. They are a professional team, capable of winning any game, including the superbowl. If you don't think so, then you don't know how sports works..

Clearly whatever goofy bitch said this hasn't watched football in the past to learn about the difference between parity and parody.

2000 Chargers 1-15, 2001 Panthers (1-15), 1996 Jets (1-15), 1990 Patriots (1-15) just to name a few awful teams that compare to your 2012 Jets. 

Add them to the boneyard you goofy bastard.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2347
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

Wow talk about public perception in this thread. Every1 bashing this play like it has no chance


you know what that means...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 1937
Posted: #64
all caps lock title and says he wants to put 50% of his bankroll on one play. usually would be an insta fade, but this guy actually has a solid record.

but what is the point of keeping track of year to date units or anything like that if you have no bankroll management whatsoever and are a huge degenerate? 

50% bankroll on jets +9 , last time i open one of your threads. not that i expect you or anyone else to care, i'm just saying.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 494
Posted: #65
whats everyone leaning towards in tonight's game?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 34267
Posted: #66

Listen to dealhunter....

....and the guy with Jets +19....that wont even work. Jets are only scoring 11 pure points per game, so as the gentlemen above said.They will need the turnover bug to bite Houston 3 to 4 times and that wont happen. Houston rolls to show the world and Jets get embarassed on MNF. Keep your first instinct and roll with Houston, just not the whole bank.

34-3 Houston

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 6581
Posted: #67
Putting 1/2 your bank roll on a single play is a foolish move don't do it op.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 53
Posted: #68
I agree totally with Wizerguy.  This game could get very ugly. This Jet team isn't able to stop the run (opponents avg 172 yds per game) and they can't get to the QB. Revis is out and Kyle Wilson would have gotten torched for 3 long plays if Alex Smith was able to lay it in there last Sunday.  They have no running game and lets not even discuss the QB play.  Anything is possible and I usually wouldn't bet against home dogs on MNF but this Jet team is dead.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 157
Posted: #69
I heard tebow was starting?????  Its going around our office in an email from facebook....
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 539
Posted: #70
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 29
Posted: #71

Quote Originally Posted by RazorSharps:

NOT UNLOAD 50% OF MY CURRENT BANKROLL ON THE JETS+9 THIS WEEK???

As well as the ML....

I loved Houston this past week but now that this week is over this just sets up a too good to be true scenario here.

JET STRAIGHT UP AND +9 AT HOME??


I AM ABOUT 85% SURE SO FAR I AM GOING TO DO THIS.  MY GUT IS JUST TELLING ME THERE IS NO WAY THIS DOESN'T WORK OUT FOR ME

Somebody save me from myself.

Razor U wrote:

TEXANS -13 MAX UNIT PLAY (15 units)

This team is consistently winning and covering ATS. Why fight it? It is obvious they are for real and looking to make a post season run into the SB. I will play them each week from here on out until they fail to cover"

In last weeks Winning write up.

Additionaly some thread in here last week contained some quote such as "An old pro i used to tail in Vegas always said 'if a team is blowing doors off the first 3-4, weeks do not buck them"

I have enjoyed your writeups and overall excellent insights into how to not beat ourselves while trying to Get The Man.

Wishing U luck...

No one game will ever make a Winner or a Loser...play accordingly,

A Friend of the right side,

Pdo 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 29
Posted: #72

Additionaly: Before placing a 50+% of Bankroll on any play take a quick look at a book from 2010 Called The Fix Is In by Brian Touhy.

Regards,

Pdo

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 15
Posted: #73
take tha 49ers over tha bills an be awinner
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 5715
Posted: #74
Attention person. How much more obvious could it be. Every play is either a Large Play=12 units or a Max Play=15 units. Really? So your average wager is 12 units, which makes absolutely no sense, and his max plays are a ridiculous 15 units, which is really only a 3 unit difference from a large play? What makes these plays large or max plays when EVERY play is a large or max play. Honestly, it's so obvious this guys a joke from the beginning. Chasing with a horrible play and unloading all those units on such a sketchy game. So what happens if he loses this? Easy answer, create another username.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 1158
Posted: #75

I know I said that about the Texans and it was premature, As the situation that unfolded puts me now on the Jets in a big way.

 

And I am not an attention person,  just trying to be helpful.  If its a big deal maybe I just wont post what I am on anymore and just give some insight on here.  I spend a ton of time on here as a hobby,.....something I enjoy....but if its a problem I can leave Spartacus

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.