Posted:
#276
Take the points and thank me later. Will be back shorty with a detailed more in depth write up.
40-7
40-70
STEELERS @ BILLS: The ultra-powerful angle@home and getting points too : "CAREER On The Line" angle
Posted:
#282
Quote Originally Posted by Natty68:
Didn't have a dog in this fight. Having a little trouble understanding what relevance his college football or college basketball record has in regards to his posts in the THE NFL FORUM. It does seem a little misleading.
Didn't have a dog in this fight. Having a little trouble understanding what relevance his college football or college basketball record has in regards to his posts in the THE NFL FORUM. It does seem a little misleading.
I'll tell you the relevance for the 10,001st time since I said it 10,000 times.
I've been here for TEN years.
In the NBA forum, I used to post just my nba record.
In the NFL, just NFL.
In the NCAA F and B, just those records respectively.
After doing all that the trolls said, "Yeah, well what is YOUR OVERALL record. You're a 50% capper!"
Which I wasn't. Far better than that. Making posters here SHI* TONS of money for A DECADE, ALL POSTS with write-ups so they could pick and choose angles they liked or disliked.
So I said, 'OK here's my overall record." And that's what I posted ever since. Then when that was at a whopping 70% or close to it like it is now, guess what the trolls did?
They said, "What's your record in JUST the NFL?" because they want to take ANYTHING worse than my overall record which drops jaws.
Do you understand now? Because you are doing,
the
same
fu**Ing
thing.
Now scram before I have to obliterate you too.
0
Posted:
#286
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I'll tell you the relevance for the 10,001st time since I said it 10,000 times.
I've been here for TEN years.
In the NBA forum, I used to post just my nba record.
In the NFL, just NFL.
In the NCAA F and B, just those records respectively.
After doing all that the trolls said, "Yeah, well what is YOUR OVERALL record. You're a 50% capper!"
Which I wasn't. Far better than that. Making posters here SHI* TONS of money for A DECADE, ALL POSTS with write-ups so they could pick and choose angles they liked or disliked.
So I said, 'OK here's my overall record." And that's what I posted ever since. Then when that was at a whopping 70% or close to it like it is now, guess what the trolls did?
They said, "What's your record in JUST the NFL?" because they want to take ANYTHING worse than my overall record which drops jaws.
Do you understand now? Because you are doing,
the
same
fu**Ing
thing.
Now scram before I have to obliterate you too.
Hahah keep it bro!!! I love it 
0
Posted:
#287
Quote Originally Posted by nahaww:
It's not me, it was Porcelainfist who tallied this, but I did check his work. Porcelainfist, on the other hand is currently looking like a 4-0 on the week with:
It's not me, it was Porcelainfist who tallied this, but I did check his work. Porcelainfist, on the other hand is currently looking like a 4-0 on the week with:
1. Chiefs -3 W
2. Bengals -5.5 W
3. Niners -2.5 (Currently up 14-0) L
4. Falcons -6 (Currently up 7-0) W
and
5. Cowboys -3 L
I tail *him*, he's up 15 units if these plays stick, 16 units if the Cowboys cover.
Gosh, looks like a guy ragging on Mr. One Unit is now Mr. One Unit.
But he has a bit more at stake. I'm fine. I have a bankroll. I post. No contests. Just spread the write-up and pick. And if you followed in 2016, you are up a boatload. If you followed in 2015 you are up a Destroyer.
This guy? 3-2 weeks in that contest he brags about continually will put you in the shi**er.
Nice job Porcelin. Looks like you ARE what you attempt to DEFAME. (and he takes ALL chalk too....not advisable and quite square).
0
Posted:
#292
f@ck it scal we lost it but I tell u if the had one more position they would have tied that game up and probably won in overtime but its all rite steelers just got ahead too much it still belive it was the right play we ll try again scal cant win them all win few then lose one or two I take it every time
0
Posted:
#294
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I was just thinking: given the trolls are up at 2 am stalking me, even after giving them consecutive winning picks (Army, St Johns and Penn State being the last three), do you think they masturbate to losing threads? It's just a thought but is it that obscene? I mean here they all are participating in one big mass troll orgy when that loser eventually arises. Winner winner winner. One loser? And all of a sudden they are breathing heavy and throwing prescription pills over their shoulder as they raid their medicine cabinet for the lube of delight.It's Freudian in its hypothesis but we cannot dismiss it immediately: trolls masturbating to losing threads. Someone will have to do the research, or they could just come out, leave their orgy garden dressed in fig leaves over their nether regions in front of their PC's and save us the trouble and admit it.Hopefully it's the latter. We'll wait and see if we can make Freud proud. I think he'll be pleased.
I was just thinking: given the trolls are up at 2 am stalking me, even after giving them consecutive winning picks (Army, St Johns and Penn State being the last three), do you think they masturbate to losing threads? It's just a thought but is it that obscene? I mean here they all are participating in one big mass troll orgy when that loser eventually arises. Winner winner winner. One loser? And all of a sudden they are breathing heavy and throwing prescription pills over their shoulder as they raid their medicine cabinet for the lube of delight.It's Freudian in its hypothesis but we cannot dismiss it immediately: trolls masturbating to losing threads. Someone will have to do the research, or they could just come out, leave their orgy garden dressed in fig leaves over their nether regions in front of their PC's and save us the trouble and admit it.Hopefully it's the latter. We'll wait and see if we can make Freud proud. I think he'll be pleased.
Scal, thanks for the plays this weekend. The silver lining to losing is getting to read the imagery in your responses to trolls haha raiding the medicine cabinet for "the lube of delight," I'm dying.
Looking forward to any future picks, keep doing your thing man.
0
Posted:
#295
There is a reason why there is no limit on an NFL side in Vegas. Know why.....because the lines are usually VERY SHARP. Consequently there is very little edge to be had. It's why they will gladly take ANY amount on red or black, odd even. But there is a limit on inside bets. They don't want to be exposed on a big hit on, say, snake eyes. It's all about what they will expose themselves to. I'm getting to the point. If I click on an NFL thread I couldn't care less of you found an edge on some obscure East Nowhere State college football or basketball game. IT IS NOT THE SAME AS CONSITENTLY BEATING THE NFL and shouldn't be represented as such. You will call me a troll. If so, you are flattering yourself......as usual. Bottom line..it's a little deceptive
As long as they pretend to pay me I will pretend to work
0
nice army win btw. Looking forward to next week
Posted:
#298
Quote Originally Posted by jajknight:
I've never seen more logic go into losing picks... pretty impressive I must say.
I've never seen more logic go into losing picks... pretty impressive I must say.
Do you want to make the world a better place???
Do the world a favor and go play a game of Russian Roulette with yourself you loser.
SNITCHES end up being bitches, or end up with stitches, and in ditches! #REALITY
0
Hot Forum Topics
