Super Bowl 51
New England Patriots vs Atlanta Falcons
NRG Stadium, Houston, Texas
6:30 PM ET, Feb 5th, 2017
(New England -3, 59)
The biggest storyline that all the major networks such as Fox Sports, ESPN, CBS, etc have been throwing out there and talking about is that when the Patriots when this Super Bowl, oh how big their Dynasty team will be and go down in history! And how Bill Belichick and Tom Brady are set to become the greatest HC/QB duo in Super Bowl history! How funny and ironic it's going to be to watch Goodell have to hand the Lombardi trophy over to a couple of people he dislikes. I've always been a firm believer in the old adage that "defense wins championships" and here we have a game in which we'll see the #1 offense of the Atlanta Falcons face off against the #1 defense of the New England Patriots. Screams a Patriots win right? Lets break it down a little and understand why these two teams are here and why they rank where they do in different categories.
I'm not going to get into a whole lot of numbers and stats for this game as every single one of you can find those for this one game by yourself. They're everywhere. But we'll talk about them some along with a little theory. To me, this seems to be one of the weakest Patriots teams in recent memory to make it to the big game. I feel like they are somewhat overrated without any real weapons. But the "public" doesn't seem to think so as they are really pounding New England and the Over for the game. No surprises there though as they see all these major networks loving them and figure Vegas has set the numbers to favor the "correct" team. I mean it is "The Goat", Tom Brady and "The Mad Genius", Bill Belichick. What could go wrong only having to cover just 3 little old points? Seems simple enough right? I mean the last five Super Bowls where the #1 defense went up against the #1 offense, the defensive team has won! I'm here to tell you don't let those numbers throw you off as they are somewhat skewed. Why do you think the line opened up at New England -3 and has stayed there even with Joe Public pounding the Patriots? I mean the Over/Under number opened up at 56 and has been bet all the way up to 59. So why no line movement in the past couple of weeks since the line came out on the -3 number? It's because every "Square" bettor in the world is on NE but all the "Sharps" are pounding Atlanta. That's why! The line could've easily been NE -5 and nobody would've even batted an eye simply because "it's the Patriots in the Super Bowl once again". The Patriots always open up 6,7 or even double digit favorites and by the end of the week before game time, the line even moves another point or two. Look, the Patriots are 4-0 all time against Atlanta with 9 TDs against only 1 interception and they averaged beating them by 10 points. Right now, 62% of the total money being bet is coming in on the side of the Patriots. But still no line movement. Think about it!
The Patriots have the #1 defense in football for a reason this year. It's because they've faced the EASIEST schedule of QBs in ALL of the NFL! When you face terrible QBs all year long, you're supposed to dominate. Because of these facts, NE led the league in starting field position. Their average starting field position was from the 35 or 36 yard line which makes it a whole heck of a lot easier to score TDs and points in general. Most teams they faced were 3 and out and punting to them. But guess what, how often do you see Atlanta's offense go 3 and out? Not very dang often. So when they do have to punt, NE will be pinned inside their own 20 and maybe 10 yard line. Now Brady and that New England offense will have to earn them points with long 80 plus yard drives and not 60 yard ones. Missing the Gronk this game is going to hurt them too. They don't have a real #1 receiver to go to. Edelman is a Slot receiver and the Gronk was Brady's go-to guy when they were in 3rd and short or 4th and short situations. And Hogan is not going to get 200 yards again here either. That was a break-out game he had against Pittsburgh. Yeah their RBs are alright. But Lewis and Blount are just "OK" at best. The Patriots played the easiest schedule of QB rating teams in football this season. It was around 80% on those QBRs. They played two good QBs in all. Russell Wilson at home where they lost, and you know how bad Seattle was on the road, and Big Ben. Roethlisberger was able to move the ball between the 20's but losing Le'veon Bell early really hurt them. The two games the Patriots played against the Texans and the Steelers, both teams were able to move the ball with ease. If anybody else was the QB for the Texans besides Brock Osweiler, they would've put up big numbers for a win against them. Brock turned the ball over in the red zone and threw multiple picks. Big Ben was the same. They got inside the 20 and settled for FGs and turned the ball over.