NE rushing offense vs. SEA rushing defense
NE are not a run-first team, though they have been
averaging just 3.9 YPC (#24), while Seattle is the 3rd best rushing
defense, allowing just 3.6 YPC. This matchup clearly goes to the Hawks. But there
is one outstanding thing: NE don’t need to run to set up the passing game. They
need to pass to set up the run game. Vereen and Gray ran for 3.9 YPC against
the Jets in the first matchup, Vereen/Bolden ran for 6.3 YPC against the Jets in
the second one, Blount/Vereen ran for 4.5 YPC against Detroit. They are pretty
much able to run for solid numbers against good run defenses, but they need
their flow. Hawks win this matchup and will likely shut down the run early in
the game, but I can see the Pats run a few 5-10 yarders when Seahawks try to
defend the pass. Brandon Mebane was brilliant at stuffing the run. He is a big
loss, but Seattle should still do well. Edge: Seattle
NE passing offense vs. SEA passing defense
This is the key matchup to win this game for any team.
NE is one of those teams where you don’t need to look at yards per pass
attempt. They ran an offense that is set up to execute. Short routes, screen passes
and medium-ranged passes make this offense so variable. This offense only
struggled when they face big time pressure from the opposite d-line like
against KC, NYJ or BUF (2nd game). But even against other strong
d-lines they had an easy game like Detroit, Denver, Baltimore. Pass defense
starts at the d-line. How about the Seattle d-line ? That’s their only
weakness. They can’t generate a decent pass rush and can’t pressure QBs. On top
of that the injuries of Mebane and Hill are hurting them. Their d-line is
obviously lacking some depth, that could be a key factor in the 2nd
quarter. Even the Raiders rallied to score 21 points in the 2nd
half. Raiders have a very good o-line, same as the Patriots. Patriots give up
just 4.4 sacks per 100 plays, that’s good for 2nd in the league. The
best team in that category ? The Denver Broncos who were able to start a
comeback late in week 2 at Seattle. Some other good o-lines Seattle faced ?
Dallas, NYG & GB. NYG scored 17 points but should really have 24 points
(tipped INT in the end zone by OBJ). Seattle gave up an average of 22.6 points
when they faced a good o-line. Carolina are not on top of good o-lines over the
season but their o-line has been one of the best lately and they as well almost
dropped 24 points on the Hawks. Tom Brady will have a field day. They will add
a short route to most passing plays to take away the Seattle blitzes. Even the
Legion of Boom will look like an average defense because of these variable
passing plays. San Diego hat an equal gameplan like NE has everytime: Short
routes and don’t let the LOB come too close. Rivers burned them heavily and
Gates went for 7 catches, 96 yards and 3 TDs. Wait to see what Gronk will do. Edge:
New England
SEA rushing offense vs. NE rushing defense
The best rushing offense in the league (5.2 YPC) against
the 11th best rushing defense (4.1 YPC). IMO the NE stats are a
little bit blending and they are worse than that. NE were up in many games and opponents tried
to pass heavily instead of running the ball. When NE faced good running teams
in games they couldn’t control from start to finish: 5.0 YPC @MIA, 5.4 @KC, 5.1
vs. NYJ, 4.9 vs. BAL. I would rank the NE rushing defense between 15 and 20
rather than at #11. My expectation: Seattle will run all over New England. NE
can’t stop the run against Seattle. Beastmode and Russel will be too much for
them. A lot of designed plays for Russel and the read option should cause some
major damage for the Pats. The 100-yard-line should be broken early in the
third quarter, if not before halftime. Edge: Seattle
SEA passing offense vs. NE passing defense
Now it gets very interesting. With Richardson out,
there is a deep threat missing. Richardson wasn’t an important guy numbers
wise, but he is able to stretch the field and create some space between the LBs
and secondary. Seahawks have been averaging 7.3 yards per pass attempt. This
line is awesome when you consider the weak receiving core Russel Wilson has
been dealing with. His o-line isn’t great as well with an adjusted sack rate of
8.7% (#24). NE have the 12th ranked pass defense (6.5 YPPA) and a
shutdown corner in Darrelle Revis. Opposite like NE, Seattle have to be
successful on the ground to set up the passing game. The NE d-line is simply average,
so Russel will likely have some time in play action situations. But I can’t see
the Hawks go deep against these playmakers on the NE secondary so they are
likely to search medium ranged passes like comebacks between 10-15 yards and a
few short passes to Marshawn Lynch. Luke Willson could see some targets as
well. They should look to get yardage after catches. With a good running game,
I can see the Hawks being successful at times when they play a conservative
passing game but the receivers of Seattle won’t beat the NE secondary. This
could be a factor when NE is up in the fourth quarter and the play calls get a
little bit riskier for Wilson. Edge: Slightly New England.
Special teams: Seriously, I never cap special teams.
It is the biggest random variable in the NFL.
Situational angle: I think both teams have enough
motivation to play for, lol. The Deflategate stuff should put the Patriots team
more together than before and the awesome fourth quarter comeback last week
should push the other side as well.