Lost with GB/CHI Over 46 on TNF. I love four teaser sides this week:
SD +13: Since Rivers is at SD, they are 14-4 ATS as 6.5+ underdogs,
18-1 on 6pt-teasers as 6.5+ underdogs. They lost 16 of 208 games by 13 or more points - that's just 7.2%. It's a great spot for SD. They are still undervalued and this offense can hang on with everyone as +6.5 underdogs. Falcons coming off two tough games at DEN & SEA. SD are on rest.
SEA +8: Since they drafted Russell Wilson, they lost just 2 games out of 79 by 8+ points. Palmer looks sloppy this season, even against NYJ he had a lot of bad throws. They won't run wild on Seattle and I really doubt they win by 8+.
NE -2: I don't see a scenario in which the Pats don't win by atleast a FG against a Landry Jones led Football team.
DEN -2.5: Teams coming off TNF playing vs. a team coming off SNF, are 18-6 ATS. 23-1 on 6pt-teasers. I don't see a scenario in which Denver don't win by atleast a FG vs an Assweiler led Football team at HOME.
Locked in so far:
SD +13 / NE -2 -110 MIN -2.5 -110
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss.
NYG -3 +105
LA come into this gm having traveled 14,535 miles since wk3 while crossing each 3 & 8 time zones within one week. NYG have no other choice than executing their west coast precisely and finally put their receivers into positions to succeed. I expect a big game by Sheppard. MIA O43.5 -110
Like said over and over again, the Fins offense falls and stands with their OL which is finally healthy. Two of Tannehill's great TD throws got called back for 3 points each so they could have scored 38 easily last week. BUF defense has played the WORST schedule of all teams at #32 in DVOA. I truly expect the Fins to score 27+ here and with that kind of defense, the Bills passing offense will find ways to score as well. Leaning MIA +3 as well and might add it.
Lions -1 -110
Skins come off four straight wins vs. passing offenses ranked 19, 20, 26 and 12. A big reason for the Eagles' struggles was RT rookie Vaitai who gave up 3 sacks to Kerrigan alone when I remember right. Lions are really clicking on offense. Doctson still out, Reed out, Desean only had one limited practice. I think this is the week to sell high on the Redskins. I like the Lions to win a 27-20 kind of game at home.
Leans:
JAX: Taking Blake Bortles off the blacklist for one week. OAK finally came back to earth vs KC last week. They could be 1-5 at this point, easily as SD could be 5-1. They travel across the country to play an early east coast game off playing two divisional home games. Good spot to fade them IMO. Jax surprisingly have
CIN: Bengals are 2-4/1-5 ATS, depending on which line you got in week one. Browns are 3-3 ATS. The Bengals play a 4-3 defense and like to get pressure by sending four. Browns played two such teams thus far and lost by a combined 23-63. Eifert back is a huge boost for this offense and I honestly don't see the Browns stopping them this week. Will wait for a confirmation though.
SD +6/+7: Honestly see Chargers winning straight up. Hayward vs. Julio is gonna be interesting to watch.
IND +3: Since 2001, road dogs off one-score loss (<=8) vs teams off one-score win are 106-62 ATS (63.1%). Pre-season line was Colts -3.5, this is now a 6.5-swing which isnt really justified IMO. Colts get Patrick Robinson back which is huge. If he and Davis take away TEN WRs in 2WR sets, they can stack the box. The Browns did an equal approach, they held Murray to 3.1 YPC.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
26-24 -1.75u
Lost with GB/CHI Over 46 on TNF. I love four teaser sides this week:
SD +13: Since Rivers is at SD, they are 14-4 ATS as 6.5+ underdogs,
18-1 on 6pt-teasers as 6.5+ underdogs. They lost 16 of 208 games by 13 or more points - that's just 7.2%. It's a great spot for SD. They are still undervalued and this offense can hang on with everyone as +6.5 underdogs. Falcons coming off two tough games at DEN & SEA. SD are on rest.
SEA +8: Since they drafted Russell Wilson, they lost just 2 games out of 79 by 8+ points. Palmer looks sloppy this season, even against NYJ he had a lot of bad throws. They won't run wild on Seattle and I really doubt they win by 8+.
NE -2: I don't see a scenario in which the Pats don't win by atleast a FG against a Landry Jones led Football team.
DEN -2.5: Teams coming off TNF playing vs. a team coming off SNF, are 18-6 ATS. 23-1 on 6pt-teasers. I don't see a scenario in which Denver don't win by atleast a FG vs an Assweiler led Football team at HOME.
Locked in so far:
SD +13 / NE -2 -110 MIN -2.5 -110
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss.
NYG -3 +105
LA come into this gm having traveled 14,535 miles since wk3 while crossing each 3 & 8 time zones within one week. NYG have no other choice than executing their west coast precisely and finally put their receivers into positions to succeed. I expect a big game by Sheppard. MIA O43.5 -110
Like said over and over again, the Fins offense falls and stands with their OL which is finally healthy. Two of Tannehill's great TD throws got called back for 3 points each so they could have scored 38 easily last week. BUF defense has played the WORST schedule of all teams at #32 in DVOA. I truly expect the Fins to score 27+ here and with that kind of defense, the Bills passing offense will find ways to score as well. Leaning MIA +3 as well and might add it.
Lions -1 -110
Skins come off four straight wins vs. passing offenses ranked 19, 20, 26 and 12. A big reason for the Eagles' struggles was RT rookie Vaitai who gave up 3 sacks to Kerrigan alone when I remember right. Lions are really clicking on offense. Doctson still out, Reed out, Desean only had one limited practice. I think this is the week to sell high on the Redskins. I like the Lions to win a 27-20 kind of game at home.
Leans:
JAX: Taking Blake Bortles off the blacklist for one week. OAK finally came back to earth vs KC last week. They could be 1-5 at this point, easily as SD could be 5-1. They travel across the country to play an early east coast game off playing two divisional home games. Good spot to fade them IMO. Jax surprisingly have
CIN: Bengals are 2-4/1-5 ATS, depending on which line you got in week one. Browns are 3-3 ATS. The Bengals play a 4-3 defense and like to get pressure by sending four. Browns played two such teams thus far and lost by a combined 23-63. Eifert back is a huge boost for this offense and I honestly don't see the Browns stopping them this week. Will wait for a confirmation though.
SD +6/+7: Honestly see Chargers winning straight up. Hayward vs. Julio is gonna be interesting to watch.
IND +3: Since 2001, road dogs off one-score loss (<=8) vs teams off one-score win are 106-62 ATS (63.1%). Pre-season line was Colts -3.5, this is now a 6.5-swing which isnt really justified IMO. Colts get Patrick Robinson back which is huge. If he and Davis take away TEN WRs in 2WR sets, they can stack the box. The Browns did an equal approach, they held Murray to 3.1 YPC.
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss."
You may also want to mention the Eagles D Line which will be feasting on the Vikings O Line missing both tackles. Vikings have less offensive weapons than the Eagles do, give me the points at home with a big bounceback spot for the birds. Vikes will start slow and never be able to bounce back. I'm not here to follow you, I'm here to correct your glaring errors.
0
"MIN -2.5 -110
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss."
You may also want to mention the Eagles D Line which will be feasting on the Vikings O Line missing both tackles. Vikings have less offensive weapons than the Eagles do, give me the points at home with a big bounceback spot for the birds. Vikes will start slow and never be able to bounce back. I'm not here to follow you, I'm here to correct your glaring errors.
Hey Suuma - great call on the dolphins last week! Do you like KC to straight up win this Sunday in Arrowhead vs the Saints? Need a survival pool pick besides Denver and Cincy (am using both).
Thanks!
0
Hey Suuma - great call on the dolphins last week! Do you like KC to straight up win this Sunday in Arrowhead vs the Saints? Need a survival pool pick besides Denver and Cincy (am using both).
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss.
As Eastside Bangers says in his post about this game, this line stinks. This is a classic linemakers set up..Philly is the right side.... imho
0
MIN -2.5 -110
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss.
As Eastside Bangers says in his post about this game, this line stinks. This is a classic linemakers set up..Philly is the right side.... imho
i agree, cincinatti needs this game desperately after their recent struggles. they see an opportunity right now with baltimore banged up, and ben roethlisberger down at home against the patriots, this gives them(in their mind most likely) a win, and losses by the other competition in their division. i see a cincy blowout, although cleveland has been game lately, just not able to get through the W door.
0
i agree, cincinatti needs this game desperately after their recent struggles. they see an opportunity right now with baltimore banged up, and ben roethlisberger down at home against the patriots, this gives them(in their mind most likely) a win, and losses by the other competition in their division. i see a cincy blowout, although cleveland has been game lately, just not able to get through the W door.
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss."
You may also want to mention the Eagles D Line which will be feasting on the Vikings O Line missing both tackles. Vikings have less offensive weapons than the Eagles do, give me the points at home with a big bounceback spot for the birds. Vikes will start slow and never be able to bounce back. I'm not here to follow you, I'm here to correct your glaring errors.
Okay Captain Teacher: Matt Kalil and Andre Smith are two of the worst tackles in the league. The Vikes never had two starting tackles this season. Jeremiah Sirles played better than both of them.
This OL got crushed by the Houston Texans' pass rush and Sam Bradford made them look like fools with precise throws to receivers missing their best option: Stefon Diggs.
Good luck on your Eagles play!
0
Quote Originally Posted by poopdollar:
"MIN -2.5 -110
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss."
You may also want to mention the Eagles D Line which will be feasting on the Vikings O Line missing both tackles. Vikings have less offensive weapons than the Eagles do, give me the points at home with a big bounceback spot for the birds. Vikes will start slow and never be able to bounce back. I'm not here to follow you, I'm here to correct your glaring errors.
Okay Captain Teacher: Matt Kalil and Andre Smith are two of the worst tackles in the league. The Vikes never had two starting tackles this season. Jeremiah Sirles played better than both of them.
This OL got crushed by the Houston Texans' pass rush and Sam Bradford made them look like fools with precise throws to receivers missing their best option: Stefon Diggs.
did you watch last week's game between the Redskins and the Eagles?
The Eagles Offense didn't score until the fourth quarter.
Dishonest opinion? Just because the Redskins didn't allow a score until the fourth quarter LAST WEEK at HOME, does it mean that they are going to repeat this on the road against this Lions offense? I don't judge my opinion on a single performance in a different situation.
0
Quote Originally Posted by porcelainfist:
What about your dishonest opinion?
did you watch last week's game between the Redskins and the Eagles?
The Eagles Offense didn't score until the fourth quarter.
Dishonest opinion? Just because the Redskins didn't allow a score until the fourth quarter LAST WEEK at HOME, does it mean that they are going to repeat this on the road against this Lions offense? I don't judge my opinion on a single performance in a different situation.
Suuma, I don't disagree with a single word you have said about the this play but this line scares me more than any other this year (plus my late line is -3). All points valid though. When we end our caps with a "I will accept a 1u loss..." something we NEVER say, we should be wary. And I've said those things as well. I just see a 28-26ish FInal score. Very worried about this play but I can't fault you for it.
0
Suuma, I don't disagree with a single word you have said about the this play but this line scares me more than any other this year (plus my late line is -3). All points valid though. When we end our caps with a "I will accept a 1u loss..." something we NEVER say, we should be wary. And I've said those things as well. I just see a 28-26ish FInal score. Very worried about this play but I can't fault you for it.
Suuma, I don't disagree with a single word you have said about the this play but this line scares me more than any other this year (plus my late line is -3). All points valid though. When we end our caps with a "I will accept a 1u loss..." something we NEVER say, we should be wary. And I've said those things as well. I just see a 28-26ish FInal score. Very worried about this play but I can't fault you for it.
Yep, I see it the same way as you. I am just countering matchup arguments. I still have the option to buy out at 3 or maybe even middle at 3.5 later.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Suuma, I don't disagree with a single word you have said about the this play but this line scares me more than any other this year (plus my late line is -3). All points valid though. When we end our caps with a "I will accept a 1u loss..." something we NEVER say, we should be wary. And I've said those things as well. I just see a 28-26ish FInal score. Very worried about this play but I can't fault you for it.
Yep, I see it the same way as you. I am just countering matchup arguments. I still have the option to buy out at 3 or maybe even middle at 3.5 later.
Okay Captain Teacher: Matt Kalil and Andre Smith are two of the worst tackles in the league. The Vikes never had two starting tackles this season. Jeremiah Sirles played better than both of them.
This OL got crushed by the Houston Texans' pass rush and Sam Bradford made them look like fools with precise throws to receivers missing their best option: Stefon Diggs.
Good luck on your Eagles play!
Great point about Kalil and Smith suuma Kalil was Spielman's first draft pick after being promoted to GM in 2012, wasting the #4 pick on, with Luke Kuechly , Fletcher Cox, Morris Claiborne and Michael Floyd all still sitting there. No way was Spielman eating crow with Kalil. He was starting no matter what- although he's a decent run blocker, he couldn't stop Rosie Odonnell on a pass rush. And Smith was in the same boat with the Bengals, who wasted their first round pick on him in 2009, and the only rusher he was able to stop was someone trying to get in front of him at the buffet tables during Training Camps
Another good point with Bradford finding "always make a QB look good" Adam Thielen, an undrafted Free Agent local Kid in 2013. And finally Cordarrelle Patterson figuring out how to read the Playbook so they could use his talent and speed for something other than returning kicks
Been following your Plays, and very impressed- Good Luck today
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Okay Captain Teacher: Matt Kalil and Andre Smith are two of the worst tackles in the league. The Vikes never had two starting tackles this season. Jeremiah Sirles played better than both of them.
This OL got crushed by the Houston Texans' pass rush and Sam Bradford made them look like fools with precise throws to receivers missing their best option: Stefon Diggs.
Good luck on your Eagles play!
Great point about Kalil and Smith suuma Kalil was Spielman's first draft pick after being promoted to GM in 2012, wasting the #4 pick on, with Luke Kuechly , Fletcher Cox, Morris Claiborne and Michael Floyd all still sitting there. No way was Spielman eating crow with Kalil. He was starting no matter what- although he's a decent run blocker, he couldn't stop Rosie Odonnell on a pass rush. And Smith was in the same boat with the Bengals, who wasted their first round pick on him in 2009, and the only rusher he was able to stop was someone trying to get in front of him at the buffet tables during Training Camps
Another good point with Bradford finding "always make a QB look good" Adam Thielen, an undrafted Free Agent local Kid in 2013. And finally Cordarrelle Patterson figuring out how to read the Playbook so they could use his talent and speed for something other than returning kicks
Been following your Plays, and very impressed- Good Luck today
Lost with GB/CHI Over 46 on TNF. I love four teaser sides this week:
SD +13: Since Rivers is at SD, they are 14-4 ATS as 6.5+ underdogs,
18-1 on 6pt-teasers as 6.5+ underdogs. They lost 16 of 208 games by 13 or more points - that's just 7.2%. It's a great spot for SD. They are still undervalued and this offense can hang on with everyone as +6.5 underdogs. Falcons coming off two tough games at DEN & SEA. SD are on rest.
SEA +8: Since they drafted Russell Wilson, they lost just 2 games out of 79 by 8+ points. Palmer looks sloppy this season, even against NYJ he had a lot of bad throws. They won't run wild on Seattle and I really doubt they win by 8+.
NE -2: I don't see a scenario in which the Pats don't win by atleast a FG against a Landry Jones led Football team.
DEN -2.5: Teams coming off TNF playing vs. a team coming off SNF, are 18-6 ATS. 23-1 on 6pt-teasers. I don't see a scenario in which Denver don't win by atleast a FG vs an Assweiler led Football team at HOME.
Locked in so far:
SD +13 / NE -2 -110 MIN -2.5 -110
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss.
NYG -3 +105
LA come into this gm having traveled 14,535 miles since wk3 while crossing each 3 & 8 time zones within one week. NYG have no other choice than executing their west coast precisely and finally put their receivers into positions to succeed. I expect a big game by Sheppard. MIA O43.5 -110
Like said over and over again, the Fins offense falls and stands with their OL which is finally healthy. Two of Tannehill's great TD throws got called back for 3 points each so they could have scored 38 easily last week. BUF defense has played the WORST schedule of all teams at #32 in DVOA. I truly expect the Fins to score 27+ here and with that kind of defense, the Bills passing offense will find ways to score as well. Leaning MIA +3 as well and might add it.
Lions -1 -110
Skins come off four straight wins vs. passing offenses ranked 19, 20, 26 and 12. A big reason for the Eagles' struggles was RT rookie Vaitai who gave up 3 sacks to Kerrigan alone when I remember right. Lions are really clicking on offense. Doctson still out, Reed out, Desean only had one limited practice. I think this is the week to sell high on the Redskins. I like the Lions to win a 27-20 kind of game at home.
Leans:
JAX: Taking Blake Bortles off the blacklist for one week. OAK finally came back to earth vs KC last week. They could be 1-5 at this point, easily as SD could be 5-1. They travel across the country to play an early east coast game off playing two divisional home games. Good spot to fade them IMO. Jax surprisingly have
CIN: Bengals are 2-4/1-5 ATS, depending on which line you got in week one. Browns are 3-3 ATS. The Bengals play a 4-3 defense and like to get pressure by sending four. Browns played two such teams thus far and lost by a combined 23-63. Eifert back is a huge boost for this offense and I honestly don't see the Browns stopping them this week. Will wait for a confirmation though.
SD +6/+7: Honestly see Chargers winning straight up. Hayward vs. Julio is gonna be interesting to watch.
IND +3: Since 2001, road dogs off one-score loss (<=8) vs teams off one-score win are 106-62 ATS (63.1%). Pre-season line was Colts -3.5, this is now a 6.5-swing which isnt really justified IMO. Colts get Patrick Robinson back which is huge. If he and Davis take away TEN WRs in 2WR sets, they can stack the box. The Browns did an equal approach, they held Murray to 3.1 YPC.
Whats up Suuma? Great card! I especially like that Chargers/Pats teaser and will be playing that myself. Thanks for the insight as always and good luck today!
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
26-24 -1.75u
Lost with GB/CHI Over 46 on TNF. I love four teaser sides this week:
SD +13: Since Rivers is at SD, they are 14-4 ATS as 6.5+ underdogs,
18-1 on 6pt-teasers as 6.5+ underdogs. They lost 16 of 208 games by 13 or more points - that's just 7.2%. It's a great spot for SD. They are still undervalued and this offense can hang on with everyone as +6.5 underdogs. Falcons coming off two tough games at DEN & SEA. SD are on rest.
SEA +8: Since they drafted Russell Wilson, they lost just 2 games out of 79 by 8+ points. Palmer looks sloppy this season, even against NYJ he had a lot of bad throws. They won't run wild on Seattle and I really doubt they win by 8+.
NE -2: I don't see a scenario in which the Pats don't win by atleast a FG against a Landry Jones led Football team.
DEN -2.5: Teams coming off TNF playing vs. a team coming off SNF, are 18-6 ATS. 23-1 on 6pt-teasers. I don't see a scenario in which Denver don't win by atleast a FG vs an Assweiler led Football team at HOME.
Locked in so far:
SD +13 / NE -2 -110 MIN -2.5 -110
This team covered 11 straight games and is going to cause tremendous matchup problems for this Eagles OL and their weak receiving corps. It's a square public play but I don't care. If Wentz and his OL beat the Vikes, I will accept a 1u loss.
NYG -3 +105
LA come into this gm having traveled 14,535 miles since wk3 while crossing each 3 & 8 time zones within one week. NYG have no other choice than executing their west coast precisely and finally put their receivers into positions to succeed. I expect a big game by Sheppard. MIA O43.5 -110
Like said over and over again, the Fins offense falls and stands with their OL which is finally healthy. Two of Tannehill's great TD throws got called back for 3 points each so they could have scored 38 easily last week. BUF defense has played the WORST schedule of all teams at #32 in DVOA. I truly expect the Fins to score 27+ here and with that kind of defense, the Bills passing offense will find ways to score as well. Leaning MIA +3 as well and might add it.
Lions -1 -110
Skins come off four straight wins vs. passing offenses ranked 19, 20, 26 and 12. A big reason for the Eagles' struggles was RT rookie Vaitai who gave up 3 sacks to Kerrigan alone when I remember right. Lions are really clicking on offense. Doctson still out, Reed out, Desean only had one limited practice. I think this is the week to sell high on the Redskins. I like the Lions to win a 27-20 kind of game at home.
Leans:
JAX: Taking Blake Bortles off the blacklist for one week. OAK finally came back to earth vs KC last week. They could be 1-5 at this point, easily as SD could be 5-1. They travel across the country to play an early east coast game off playing two divisional home games. Good spot to fade them IMO. Jax surprisingly have
CIN: Bengals are 2-4/1-5 ATS, depending on which line you got in week one. Browns are 3-3 ATS. The Bengals play a 4-3 defense and like to get pressure by sending four. Browns played two such teams thus far and lost by a combined 23-63. Eifert back is a huge boost for this offense and I honestly don't see the Browns stopping them this week. Will wait for a confirmation though.
SD +6/+7: Honestly see Chargers winning straight up. Hayward vs. Julio is gonna be interesting to watch.
IND +3: Since 2001, road dogs off one-score loss (<=8) vs teams off one-score win are 106-62 ATS (63.1%). Pre-season line was Colts -3.5, this is now a 6.5-swing which isnt really justified IMO. Colts get Patrick Robinson back which is huge. If he and Davis take away TEN WRs in 2WR sets, they can stack the box. The Browns did an equal approach, they held Murray to 3.1 YPC.
Whats up Suuma? Great card! I especially like that Chargers/Pats teaser and will be playing that myself. Thanks for the insight as always and good luck today!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.