Quote Originally Posted by JFEEZEE: How about Miami going for two after that touchdown down and not converting to kill the over Yeah, they did that specifically to target the over bettors.
the dolphins going for 2 was the right play. just because that guy doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about doesn't mean they don't rig games
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Cats:
Quote Originally Posted by JFEEZEE: How about Miami going for two after that touchdown down and not converting to kill the over Yeah, they did that specifically to target the over bettors.
the dolphins going for 2 was the right play. just because that guy doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about doesn't mean they don't rig games
You are dead right with that explanation the refs and their red flags sways wich way to go, but all this blind purists resist to knowledge the game is rigged. The average non gambling fan can't see through the bs the game has become.
1
@ThirtyThree
You are dead right with that explanation the refs and their red flags sways wich way to go, but all this blind purists resist to knowledge the game is rigged. The average non gambling fan can't see through the bs the game has become.
How long have you guys been betting on football thinking it's rigged? I mean at what point do you guys accept it and quit if that is what you believe instead of whining every week. Since you obviously can't accept losing.
Btw, y'all know PI WAS reviewable for a season, right? They tried it and then it was the owners themselves who voted not to keep it.
1
How long have you guys been betting on football thinking it's rigged? I mean at what point do you guys accept it and quit if that is what you believe instead of whining every week. Since you obviously can't accept losing.
Btw, y'all know PI WAS reviewable for a season, right? They tried it and then it was the owners themselves who voted not to keep it.
Quote Originally Posted by JFEEZEE: How about Miami going for two after that touchdown down and not converting to kill the overit only made sense to go for 2…why kick an ex pt and still be down 12 pts when you can be down a td and a fg? But of course people who lose think it’s all rigged
it aint rigged, only scripted…
0
Quote Originally Posted by MadeInDade:
Quote Originally Posted by JFEEZEE: How about Miami going for two after that touchdown down and not converting to kill the overit only made sense to go for 2…why kick an ex pt and still be down 12 pts when you can be down a td and a fg? But of course people who lose think it’s all rigged
I was literally just telling my uncle about how I think this works. And no, I cannot trust the %s on $ or amount of bets, but based on those, in my experience (especially in these primetime games), Vegas splits. the packers and spread had 6 or 7 tickets out of 10. (65%)the over had 7 tickets out of 10. (70%) When a game is played out and seemingly in favor of one of these sides (let’s say by halftime or after), the refs will attempt to control the outcome so that the handle is split. With the packers tonight, dominating 1h and in full control of the cover, the books needed an under to come in to split. This is when the flags come out. Trying to control the outcome. Do not want a packers and over, in which case 70% wins on side and total. The books lose on both. so…. What happens? also, had the dolphins converted their 2 point conversion in the 4th they would have been in position to backdoor the 3.5. In this case, the dolphins and over come in. in either case, a split be sure to track this in prime time games. The above statement is definitely hitting higher than 60-65%
I honestly believe this because that non call on PI was as blatant as they come
0
Quote Originally Posted by ThirtyThree:
I was literally just telling my uncle about how I think this works. And no, I cannot trust the %s on $ or amount of bets, but based on those, in my experience (especially in these primetime games), Vegas splits. the packers and spread had 6 or 7 tickets out of 10. (65%)the over had 7 tickets out of 10. (70%) When a game is played out and seemingly in favor of one of these sides (let’s say by halftime or after), the refs will attempt to control the outcome so that the handle is split. With the packers tonight, dominating 1h and in full control of the cover, the books needed an under to come in to split. This is when the flags come out. Trying to control the outcome. Do not want a packers and over, in which case 70% wins on side and total. The books lose on both. so…. What happens? also, had the dolphins converted their 2 point conversion in the 4th they would have been in position to backdoor the 3.5. In this case, the dolphins and over come in. in either case, a split be sure to track this in prime time games. The above statement is definitely hitting higher than 60-65%
I honestly believe this because that non call on PI was as blatant as they come
How long have you guys been betting on football thinking it's rigged? I mean at what point do you guys accept it and quit if that is what you believe instead of whining every week. Since you obviously can't accept losing. Btw, y'all know PI WAS reviewable for a season, right? They tried it and then it was the owners themselves who voted not to keep it.
I didn't even have the over boss, it was more of a seeing the non PI and then out of curiosity checking what the O/U was and sure enough they couldn't have any more points lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:
How long have you guys been betting on football thinking it's rigged? I mean at what point do you guys accept it and quit if that is what you believe instead of whining every week. Since you obviously can't accept losing. Btw, y'all know PI WAS reviewable for a season, right? They tried it and then it was the owners themselves who voted not to keep it.
I didn't even have the over boss, it was more of a seeing the non PI and then out of curiosity checking what the O/U was and sure enough they couldn't have any more points lol
Fellas if you think it's rigged then think it's rig
If you think it's not rigged then think it's not rigged.
I myself think it's most definitely manipulated and controlled by the stripes on the field and not reflected in such when the split take is even and not one sided.
When the money is dominated on one side the deceptivemess comes into play best believe it.
This practice seems most polarized on primetime games.
Their are seven referees/officials on the field in each game none of you want to add in the two replay officials.
The officials mentioned above are the ONLY ones that have the control to control or do their best to control the outcome and NO ONE else. No players, No coaches, No Personnel, though it may seem that they do because of some of their bonehead decisions.
I'm sure they have a meeting with these men before each and every game and have their game time instructions from the league.
Noone really knows what the true handle on these games really are or which side is being played except the gambling industry in which case their desired outcome when deemed necessary most always prevails.
So the question remains what side is the money flowing on and is overwhelmingly getting the majority of the action because if you can come up with that answer you will have the winner.
That's just my take on this subject which appears to most always come up as a topic on this forum.
But like everyone else on this thread it's just my own posted opinion.
Let's move on and off this subject gentleman and see if we can come up with this weekends winner.
0
Fellas if you think it's rigged then think it's rig
If you think it's not rigged then think it's not rigged.
I myself think it's most definitely manipulated and controlled by the stripes on the field and not reflected in such when the split take is even and not one sided.
When the money is dominated on one side the deceptivemess comes into play best believe it.
This practice seems most polarized on primetime games.
Their are seven referees/officials on the field in each game none of you want to add in the two replay officials.
The officials mentioned above are the ONLY ones that have the control to control or do their best to control the outcome and NO ONE else. No players, No coaches, No Personnel, though it may seem that they do because of some of their bonehead decisions.
I'm sure they have a meeting with these men before each and every game and have their game time instructions from the league.
Noone really knows what the true handle on these games really are or which side is being played except the gambling industry in which case their desired outcome when deemed necessary most always prevails.
So the question remains what side is the money flowing on and is overwhelmingly getting the majority of the action because if you can come up with that answer you will have the winner.
That's just my take on this subject which appears to most always come up as a topic on this forum.
But like everyone else on this thread it's just my own posted opinion.
Let's move on and off this subject gentleman and see if we can come up with this weekends winner.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
