This is a similar spot where Philly played Houston Texans which was a competitive game towards the end.
Chicago is 2-4 at HOME this year. They beat SF and Houston. In those 4 losses, it was by 5, 3, and 1 (Washington, Miami and Detroit). The last loss to GB was by 9 but they scored 18 in the 4th so the final score isn’t a true reflection of how the game went.
I’m loving this play Sac.
0
This is a similar spot where Philly played Houston Texans which was a competitive game towards the end.
Chicago is 2-4 at HOME this year. They beat SF and Houston. In those 4 losses, it was by 5, 3, and 1 (Washington, Miami and Detroit). The last loss to GB was by 9 but they scored 18 in the 4th so the final score isn’t a true reflection of how the game went.
My only argument for the ML play is I think Chicago may lose to keep their top 3 pick. If they win, they could fall outside top 5 as their schedule has been tougher than Denver and LA Rams.
However, I don’t think the players are thinking about that with one month left in the season. This is their Super Bowl to knock off the only 12-1 team remaining.
0
My only argument for the ML play is I think Chicago may lose to keep their top 3 pick. If they win, they could fall outside top 5 as their schedule has been tougher than Denver and LA Rams.
However, I don’t think the players are thinking about that with one month left in the season. This is their Super Bowl to knock off the only 12-1 team remaining.
Quote Originally Posted by Gspks1: My only thought here is you took it plus 8... Knowing the Eagles were going to be bet up... (it is already +9)...why did you not wait a day or two at least? Played it before the Eagles and Giants played, and I was grossly wrong about that outcome.
makes sense...
G's pks
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Quote Originally Posted by Gspks1: My only thought here is you took it plus 8... Knowing the Eagles were going to be bet up... (it is already +9)...why did you not wait a day or two at least? Played it before the Eagles and Giants played, and I was grossly wrong about that outcome.
Interesting coaching matchup. Nick Sirianni and Matt Eberflus were coordinators for Frank Reich in Indy for quite some time. Who knows who better? Are they buds? If the Eagles are up by 2 scores late in the game, will Sirianni get off the gas as to not embarrass his friend?
Watched an interview with Eberflus. He said that he spent 3 years with Sirianni in Indy. Their offices were next to each other, and they owned houses in the same neighborhood.
These guys are pals.
1
Interesting coaching matchup. Nick Sirianni and Matt Eberflus were coordinators for Frank Reich in Indy for quite some time. Who knows who better? Are they buds? If the Eagles are up by 2 scores late in the game, will Sirianni get off the gas as to not embarrass his friend?
Watched an interview with Eberflus. He said that he spent 3 years with Sirianni in Indy. Their offices were next to each other, and they owned houses in the same neighborhood.
interesting spot for Philly. only 2-4 ATS on the road (6-1 at home). b2b travel with a potentially huge game against Dallas next week.
Chicago at home and 2 weeks rest. Chicago can definitely score with Fields at the helm, even against a good Philly defense.
Philly should have no trouble scoring. The bears dee is ASS (giving up 49, 35, 31, 27, 31,28 last 6) and Philly TT over looks reasonable.
The question is "can Chicago keep up"? Certainly if they avoid turnovers and are giving full effort even though they are out of the playoff conversation.
I'm not sure being coordinators together in Indy makes any difference. Philly has shown they dont let off the gas until late and with massive leads no matter who they play.
Dont hate the points here but wouldnt be surprised if Philly notches another double digit win
0
interesting spot for Philly. only 2-4 ATS on the road (6-1 at home). b2b travel with a potentially huge game against Dallas next week.
Chicago at home and 2 weeks rest. Chicago can definitely score with Fields at the helm, even against a good Philly defense.
Philly should have no trouble scoring. The bears dee is ASS (giving up 49, 35, 31, 27, 31,28 last 6) and Philly TT over looks reasonable.
The question is "can Chicago keep up"? Certainly if they avoid turnovers and are giving full effort even though they are out of the playoff conversation.
I'm not sure being coordinators together in Indy makes any difference. Philly has shown they dont let off the gas until late and with massive leads no matter who they play.
Dont hate the points here but wouldnt be surprised if Philly notches another double digit win
Sac, i too see this as too many road points but man these bears, im probably going to be on bears 1stH +4.5 instead of full game. Honestly a philly blowout here would favor a hammer on dallas next week as philly in a worse spot in dallas than here.
0
Sac, i too see this as too many road points but man these bears, im probably going to be on bears 1stH +4.5 instead of full game. Honestly a philly blowout here would favor a hammer on dallas next week as philly in a worse spot in dallas than here.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.