We need to throw out the Tampa Bay and last years San Fransisco debacles. The Packers are a different team today. First lets start with the offense. Last year was their 1st in this new system. Improved offensive stats from the McCarthy days, but too inconsistent and not physical enough to handle the tough defenses, they got bullied. Big steps taken this year two with Lafleur. Rodgers became more comfortable with the system, the O-line improved and the Running game became more physical. The improvement of the TE position was also a key in the evolution of this offense from year 1, Rodgers now has a safety net and they simply don't turn the ball over.. The Rams on the other hand are battered. Who's starting at QB, is Kupp playing, can the offense score enough to keep up with the packers?
Another key factor in this game is rest. The Rams have come off of three tough physical games and now have to fly into Wisconsin vs a well rested and VERY healthy Green Bay team minus their LT. The Rams on the other hand have two big question marks. Who will start at Qb and will Donald be effective- how serious is his injury. Big edge Green Bay.
We all know how good the Rams defense is. Number One ranked in the league. But who have they really played? Only two teams IMO with an actual offense. Tampa who scored 24 and Buffalo who scored 35. Moving to the Packers, their defense has vastly improved over the final 5 weeks of the season. they gave up under 20 points in all but one game, and if weren't for a late garbage Td by the Lions it would've been 5/5. I don't expect the rams to score much Saturday.
Biggest factor for me in this game is the QB position. Does anyone in here really believe that Aaron Rodgers is losing to Wolford/Goff? I don't
Green Bay -6.5.
Green Bay -3.5 1st half
Green Bay TT Ov 27
Green Bay teased with Baltimore
I'll be taking Green Bay in alternate spreads as well.
GLA.
4
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
We need to throw out the Tampa Bay and last years San Fransisco debacles. The Packers are a different team today. First lets start with the offense. Last year was their 1st in this new system. Improved offensive stats from the McCarthy days, but too inconsistent and not physical enough to handle the tough defenses, they got bullied. Big steps taken this year two with Lafleur. Rodgers became more comfortable with the system, the O-line improved and the Running game became more physical. The improvement of the TE position was also a key in the evolution of this offense from year 1, Rodgers now has a safety net and they simply don't turn the ball over.. The Rams on the other hand are battered. Who's starting at QB, is Kupp playing, can the offense score enough to keep up with the packers?
Another key factor in this game is rest. The Rams have come off of three tough physical games and now have to fly into Wisconsin vs a well rested and VERY healthy Green Bay team minus their LT. The Rams on the other hand have two big question marks. Who will start at Qb and will Donald be effective- how serious is his injury. Big edge Green Bay.
We all know how good the Rams defense is. Number One ranked in the league. But who have they really played? Only two teams IMO with an actual offense. Tampa who scored 24 and Buffalo who scored 35. Moving to the Packers, their defense has vastly improved over the final 5 weeks of the season. they gave up under 20 points in all but one game, and if weren't for a late garbage Td by the Lions it would've been 5/5. I don't expect the rams to score much Saturday.
Biggest factor for me in this game is the QB position. Does anyone in here really believe that Aaron Rodgers is losing to Wolford/Goff? I don't
Green Bay -6.5.
Green Bay -3.5 1st half
Green Bay TT Ov 27
Green Bay teased with Baltimore
I'll be taking Green Bay in alternate spreads as well.
this Dude must be banging one of the Ram's chearleaders. because he thinks the rams will win outright and the packers will struggle. he has no clue and for saying La fleur is 0-1 is a retarted call since he only went 26-6 in his first 2 years. best record to start ever for a coach his age. and the packers just having guys in green shirts .lol. only the best Qb in the NFl . best wide receiver, best kicker next , best Corner back in the League and i could go on. but its ok. keep thinking your bull shit rams with no Qb are coming into Green bay with 6000 fans and 20 degree weather where rodgers record is insane then you need to keep banging your cheerleader . its the only positive thing you'll enjoy..
1
@chic-cardinals
this Dude must be banging one of the Ram's chearleaders. because he thinks the rams will win outright and the packers will struggle. he has no clue and for saying La fleur is 0-1 is a retarted call since he only went 26-6 in his first 2 years. best record to start ever for a coach his age. and the packers just having guys in green shirts .lol. only the best Qb in the NFl . best wide receiver, best kicker next , best Corner back in the League and i could go on. but its ok. keep thinking your bull shit rams with no Qb are coming into Green bay with 6000 fans and 20 degree weather where rodgers record is insane then you need to keep banging your cheerleader . its the only positive thing you'll enjoy..
The query is a pretty simple one: season = 2020 and po:team = Seahawks This season, teams are 7-8-1 ATS after playing SEA, and that is with an average line of only +2.1 points.
This will be the third time LA is playing off a game vs the hawks. How’d the first 2 go?
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
The query is a pretty simple one: season = 2020 and po:team = Seahawks This season, teams are 7-8-1 ATS after playing SEA, and that is with an average line of only +2.1 points.
This will be the third time LA is playing off a game vs the hawks. How’d the first 2 go?
why are you guy's mentioning Seattle. why not talk about how they lost at home to the jet's in week 15 . they would of won the division and played at home. lol. seriously. and you think they will beat Green Bay in Green Bay. you guy's need to get out of your Basements and smell the fresh air..
1
why are you guy's mentioning Seattle. why not talk about how they lost at home to the jet's in week 15 . they would of won the division and played at home. lol. seriously. and you think they will beat Green Bay in Green Bay. you guy's need to get out of your Basements and smell the fresh air..
Also for the sake of accuracy and anybody betting this game..
The temp isn’t going to be “20 degrees.” In fact at no point between now and kickoff is the temp projected to drop below 24 & the high Saturday afternoon (likely around kickoff) is 34. It’s been steadily increasing all week. Just FWIW.
1
Also for the sake of accuracy and anybody betting this game..
The temp isn’t going to be “20 degrees.” In fact at no point between now and kickoff is the temp projected to drop below 24 & the high Saturday afternoon (likely around kickoff) is 34. It’s been steadily increasing all week. Just FWIW.
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: The query is a pretty simple one: season = 2020 and po:team = Seahawks This season, teams are 7-8-1 ATS after playing SEA, and that is with an average line of only +2.1 points. This will be the third time LA is playing off a game vs the hawks. How’d the first 2 go?
After defeating SEA as a HF, LAR beat TB as an AD. After losing and failing to cover as an AD at SEA, LAR won and covered as a small HF vs. AZ.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11:
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: The query is a pretty simple one: season = 2020 and po:team = Seahawks This season, teams are 7-8-1 ATS after playing SEA, and that is with an average line of only +2.1 points. This will be the third time LA is playing off a game vs the hawks. How’d the first 2 go?
After defeating SEA as a HF, LAR beat TB as an AD. After losing and failing to cover as an AD at SEA, LAR won and covered as a small HF vs. AZ.
do you live in Wi.. Do you trust the weather channel. it can change in a second in Wisconsin. Sat am they will be cleaning snow from the 2 nights prior. there is always a chance it can continue into the next night and Oh btw when it's warm is when the snow falls. Not when its freezing. weather will not be a factor here. The factor here is these Ram lovers thinking green bay will lay another Egg and lose to a Shity as team who beat Seattle who sucked all year too. A team who lost to the Jet's and could of won the Division if they didn't a team with only a few guys on Defense to talk about and they aren't 100 % healthy. God this will be more fun to comment sat night when the game it over. I hope all you ram lovers dont crawl under a rock and can't take defeat like a man or woman or whatever you want to call yourself these days.
1
@HockeyNight11
do you live in Wi.. Do you trust the weather channel. it can change in a second in Wisconsin. Sat am they will be cleaning snow from the 2 nights prior. there is always a chance it can continue into the next night and Oh btw when it's warm is when the snow falls. Not when its freezing. weather will not be a factor here. The factor here is these Ram lovers thinking green bay will lay another Egg and lose to a Shity as team who beat Seattle who sucked all year too. A team who lost to the Jet's and could of won the Division if they didn't a team with only a few guys on Defense to talk about and they aren't 100 % healthy. God this will be more fun to comment sat night when the game it over. I hope all you ram lovers dont crawl under a rock and can't take defeat like a man or woman or whatever you want to call yourself these days.
@chic-cardinals this Dude must be banging one of the Ram's chearleaders. because he thinks the rams will win outright and the packers will struggle. he has no clue and for saying La fleur is 0-1 is a retarted call since he only went 26-6 in his first 2 years. best record to start ever for a coach his age. and the packers just having guys in green shirts .lol. only the best Qb in the NFl . best wide receiver, best kicker next , best Corner back in the League and i could go on. but its ok. keep thinking your bull shit rams with no Qb are coming into Green bay with 6000 fans and 20 degree weather where rodgers record is insane then you need to keep banging your cheerleader . its the only positive thing you'll enjoy..
I did say they had a best QB. I said that's ALL they have.
Coach- 0-1 in playoffs.playoffs.
26-6 irrelevant to Playoffs experience.
They do not have a best kicker or wide receiver. They have currently statistically good ones. Rams HAVE best defensive end. Best CB. Best defense.
Lol at thinking 6000 fans means squat. It won't affect any player regardless who wins.. The temperature is irrelevant to any GB advantage. That's just sports debate fodder. Many players on both sides played on pro and college teams in cold weather States At some point. They all have experience. They all hate it..
0
Quote Originally Posted by carguy342005:
@chic-cardinals this Dude must be banging one of the Ram's chearleaders. because he thinks the rams will win outright and the packers will struggle. he has no clue and for saying La fleur is 0-1 is a retarted call since he only went 26-6 in his first 2 years. best record to start ever for a coach his age. and the packers just having guys in green shirts .lol. only the best Qb in the NFl . best wide receiver, best kicker next , best Corner back in the League and i could go on. but its ok. keep thinking your bull shit rams with no Qb are coming into Green bay with 6000 fans and 20 degree weather where rodgers record is insane then you need to keep banging your cheerleader . its the only positive thing you'll enjoy..
I did say they had a best QB. I said that's ALL they have.
Coach- 0-1 in playoffs.playoffs.
26-6 irrelevant to Playoffs experience.
They do not have a best kicker or wide receiver. They have currently statistically good ones. Rams HAVE best defensive end. Best CB. Best defense.
Lol at thinking 6000 fans means squat. It won't affect any player regardless who wins.. The temperature is irrelevant to any GB advantage. That's just sports debate fodder. Many players on both sides played on pro and college teams in cold weather States At some point. They all have experience. They all hate it..
why are you guy's mentioning Seattle. why not talk about how they lost at home to the jet's in week 15 . they would of won the division and played at home. lol. seriously. and you think they will beat Green Bay in Green Bay. you guy's need to get out of your Basements and smell the fresh air..
That's why it's entertainment and not competition.
Of course they lost the game. It continued to make the following week more intriguing. Has nothing to do with now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by carguy342005:
why are you guy's mentioning Seattle. why not talk about how they lost at home to the jet's in week 15 . they would of won the division and played at home. lol. seriously. and you think they will beat Green Bay in Green Bay. you guy's need to get out of your Basements and smell the fresh air..
That's why it's entertainment and not competition.
Of course they lost the game. It continued to make the following week more intriguing. Has nothing to do with now.
who is the best Wide receiver in the NFl if its not adams this year. WHO? do you watch espn etc. they all say Adams is the best . forget that how can you say Crosby isn't one of the best other then tucker no one comes close. and clearly you never been to green bay because 6000 fans from wi will feel like 60,000. watch and see when the anouncers say how loud it is. lol. I hope u only bet a $100 on the rams.. don't hurt your pocket.
1
@chic-cardinals
who is the best Wide receiver in the NFl if its not adams this year. WHO? do you watch espn etc. they all say Adams is the best . forget that how can you say Crosby isn't one of the best other then tucker no one comes close. and clearly you never been to green bay because 6000 fans from wi will feel like 60,000. watch and see when the anouncers say how loud it is. lol. I hope u only bet a $100 on the rams.. don't hurt your pocket.
@chic-cardinals who is the best Wide receiver in the NFl if its not adams this year. WHO? do you watch espn etc. they all say Adams is the best . forget that how can you say Crosby isn't one of the best other then tucker no one comes close. and clearly you never been to green bay because 6000 fans from wi will feel like 60,000. watch and see when the anouncers say how loud it is. lol. I hope u only bet a $100 on the rams.. don't hurt your pocket.
Pay attention.. I said statistically best now. That does not mean best long term. He's this year's regular season darling. Doesn't mean success in playoffs...see 70s Rams and 80s Chargers, 80s Brown's etc..
Lol at saying ,do you watch tv? Yes, it's purpose is to influence you and make you think what they want you to. That's why idiots wear masks and people think captain State farm won't lose lol.
Major market, number one defenses go deep in playoffs. That's just how it is.
This is fun and it's only Wednesday!! Lol all in fun!
0
Quote Originally Posted by carguy342005:
@chic-cardinals who is the best Wide receiver in the NFl if its not adams this year. WHO? do you watch espn etc. they all say Adams is the best . forget that how can you say Crosby isn't one of the best other then tucker no one comes close. and clearly you never been to green bay because 6000 fans from wi will feel like 60,000. watch and see when the anouncers say how loud it is. lol. I hope u only bet a $100 on the rams.. don't hurt your pocket.
Pay attention.. I said statistically best now. That does not mean best long term. He's this year's regular season darling. Doesn't mean success in playoffs...see 70s Rams and 80s Chargers, 80s Brown's etc..
Lol at saying ,do you watch tv? Yes, it's purpose is to influence you and make you think what they want you to. That's why idiots wear masks and people think captain State farm won't lose lol.
Major market, number one defenses go deep in playoffs. That's just how it is.
This is fun and it's only Wednesday!! Lol all in fun!
I swear I feel like Nancy Pelosi is involved into this conversation. masks. why don't we just talk about her 100,000 dollar Fridge. I mean wow. nothing u said show's me why the rams are going to cover yet alone win. your talking 70,s 80s etc. who won the most NFL championships and Superbowls back then Green bay , pittsburgh where did the Ram's show up in the stat? And Mr rodgers and his neigborhood will walk into the Superbowl to play Mahomes and his new Hair cut commerical. it's Scripted and it will be the best Superbowl ever and most watched..
0
@chic-cardinals
I swear I feel like Nancy Pelosi is involved into this conversation. masks. why don't we just talk about her 100,000 dollar Fridge. I mean wow. nothing u said show's me why the rams are going to cover yet alone win. your talking 70,s 80s etc. who won the most NFL championships and Superbowls back then Green bay , pittsburgh where did the Ram's show up in the stat? And Mr rodgers and his neigborhood will walk into the Superbowl to play Mahomes and his new Hair cut commerical. it's Scripted and it will be the best Superbowl ever and most watched..
The 1st half should be key with GB off a bye. LAR have a proven track record of winning games where they hold the lead at the end of the first half. If for some reason GB stumbles in the 1st half then they may be in trouble. Like the 1st half bet though. GL
Relax. I'm unvaxxed!
1
@tootskie
The 1st half should be key with GB off a bye. LAR have a proven track record of winning games where they hold the lead at the end of the first half. If for some reason GB stumbles in the 1st half then they may be in trouble. Like the 1st half bet though. GL
@chic-cardinals I swear I feel like Nancy Pelosi is involved into this conversation. masks. why don't we just talk about her 100,000 dollar Fridge. I mean wow. nothing u said show's me why the rams are going to cover yet alone win. your talking 70,s 80s etc. who won the most NFL championships and Superbowls back then Green bay , pittsburgh where did the Ram's show up in the stat? And Mr rodgers and his neigborhood will walk into the Superbowl to play Mahomes and his new Hair cut commerical. it's Scripted and it will be the best Superbowl ever and most watched..
---------------------------
your talking 70,s 80s etc. who won the most NFL championships and Superbowls back then Green bay , pittsburgh
________________
Um....no, the Packers didn't. My point was ,teams that make playoffs every year but lose. The 2000s Packers with Rodgers are that team now..
Nothing I said proves Rams will win? Number one defense. Nunber 1 defense, number one defense.
Better post season coach, better post season coach.
Just having some fun ,dude
0
Quote Originally Posted by carguy342005:
@chic-cardinals I swear I feel like Nancy Pelosi is involved into this conversation. masks. why don't we just talk about her 100,000 dollar Fridge. I mean wow. nothing u said show's me why the rams are going to cover yet alone win. your talking 70,s 80s etc. who won the most NFL championships and Superbowls back then Green bay , pittsburgh where did the Ram's show up in the stat? And Mr rodgers and his neigborhood will walk into the Superbowl to play Mahomes and his new Hair cut commerical. it's Scripted and it will be the best Superbowl ever and most watched..
---------------------------
your talking 70,s 80s etc. who won the most NFL championships and Superbowls back then Green bay , pittsburgh
________________
Um....no, the Packers didn't. My point was ,teams that make playoffs every year but lose. The 2000s Packers with Rodgers are that team now..
Nothing I said proves Rams will win? Number one defense. Nunber 1 defense, number one defense.
Better post season coach, better post season coach.
its all good and fun until someone gets hurt and that will be the rams and their coach.. They have all this pressure to go into Green bay and display this awesome defense. when the packers D feels like chump change. watch the glory here. the announcers will talk about how the green bay defense stepped up in this game and how well the offense played as well. Because we know the rams offense has no chance to play in a shoot out with A rod.
1
@chic-cardinals
its all good and fun until someone gets hurt and that will be the rams and their coach.. They have all this pressure to go into Green bay and display this awesome defense. when the packers D feels like chump change. watch the glory here. the announcers will talk about how the green bay defense stepped up in this game and how well the offense played as well. Because we know the rams offense has no chance to play in a shoot out with A rod.
Because he likes the Rams. I’ve been lurking here for a while, I’m pretty sure I recall him saying he was a Rams fan or something and they were set up for the future around last NFC title game. Either way, he’s trying to convince himself that athletes have played in this weather so it’s not an advantage. It’s hilarious. I’ve seen so many actual players say it’s an advantage if you’re used to playing in it. I watched the Collinsworth podcast with Richard Sherman, and he was just saying how it takes some of these guys like a quarter to actually play football and trust their feet. Especially the corners, they can’t be as aggressive with their feet.
0
@carguy342005
Because he likes the Rams. I’ve been lurking here for a while, I’m pretty sure I recall him saying he was a Rams fan or something and they were set up for the future around last NFC title game. Either way, he’s trying to convince himself that athletes have played in this weather so it’s not an advantage. It’s hilarious. I’ve seen so many actual players say it’s an advantage if you’re used to playing in it. I watched the Collinsworth podcast with Richard Sherman, and he was just saying how it takes some of these guys like a quarter to actually play football and trust their feet. Especially the corners, they can’t be as aggressive with their feet.
@carguy342005 Because he likes the Rams. I’ve been lurking here for a while, I’m pretty sure I recall him saying he was a Rams fan or something and they were set up for the future around last NFC title game. Either way, he’s trying to convince himself that athletes have played in this weather so it’s not an advantage. It’s hilarious. I’ve seen so many actual players say it’s an advantage if you’re used to playing in it. I watched the Collinsworth podcast with Richard Sherman, and he was just saying how it takes some of these guys like a quarter to actually play football and trust their feet. Especially the corners, they can’t be as aggressive with their feet.
Trying to convince myself? Players on each team are from all over the country. They aren't some 10 year old that never traveled.
I'm Rams AND Packers fan actually.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RowdyNation18:
@carguy342005 Because he likes the Rams. I’ve been lurking here for a while, I’m pretty sure I recall him saying he was a Rams fan or something and they were set up for the future around last NFC title game. Either way, he’s trying to convince himself that athletes have played in this weather so it’s not an advantage. It’s hilarious. I’ve seen so many actual players say it’s an advantage if you’re used to playing in it. I watched the Collinsworth podcast with Richard Sherman, and he was just saying how it takes some of these guys like a quarter to actually play football and trust their feet. Especially the corners, they can’t be as aggressive with their feet.
Trying to convince myself? Players on each team are from all over the country. They aren't some 10 year old that never traveled.
were not talking about the weather. i am not saying this is a advantage . The topic the rams coming into Green bay with a so called amazing defense. one that lost to the Jet's which no one is still talking about.. lol
0
@RowdyNation18
were not talking about the weather. i am not saying this is a advantage . The topic the rams coming into Green bay with a so called amazing defense. one that lost to the Jet's which no one is still talking about.. lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.