Nothing too crazy here. Just throwing one unit imo in case the Niners put up 38+... But the more I think about I think the more I like the under here. Both teams are gonna run the ball and consume a lot of clock. Niners D is not the Dallas D and they are gonna do a much better job of containing Aaron Jones and the Packers offense. I expect them to hold em to a minimal number of points while eating significant clock and keeping them out of the end zone on drives. My gut tells me this could be a 31-13 or 34-13 kind of game.,, I can see the Niners putting up 30+ but I don't see Green Bay scoring a ton of points in this one. There was also an initial drop in the total despite the fact that the majority of cash was on the over, indicating there may have possibly been sharp money thrown on the over. In any case, I like this one to stay under the total. I may go with Niners -10 later in the week as well, but this is all I have taken as of now.
Nothing too crazy here. Just throwing one unit imo in case the Niners put up 38+... But the more I think about I think the more I like the under here. Both teams are gonna run the ball and consume a lot of clock. Niners D is not the Dallas D and they are gonna do a much better job of containing Aaron Jones and the Packers offense. I expect them to hold em to a minimal number of points while eating significant clock and keeping them out of the end zone on drives. My gut tells me this could be a 31-13 or 34-13 kind of game.,, I can see the Niners putting up 30+ but I don't see Green Bay scoring a ton of points in this one. There was also an initial drop in the total despite the fact that the majority of cash was on the over, indicating there may have possibly been sharp money thrown on the over. In any case, I like this one to stay under the total. I may go with Niners -10 later in the week as well, but this is all I have taken as of now.
100%... Its the classic inflated total due to the prior game... another episode of recency bias... They set it higher knowing many of the public would hop on over after what happened with gb/det. To me, both the total, and the opening line of houston +10 are both inlfated intentional, "traps" set by the books..
By no means does this mean we are both walking away with winning tickets this weekend but I am loving both 49ers and the under
100%... Its the classic inflated total due to the prior game... another episode of recency bias... They set it higher knowing many of the public would hop on over after what happened with gb/det. To me, both the total, and the opening line of houston +10 are both inlfated intentional, "traps" set by the books..
By no means does this mean we are both walking away with winning tickets this weekend but I am loving both 49ers and the under
@JimmyGape 100%... Its the classic inflated total due to the prior game... another episode of recency bias... They set it higher knowing many of the public would hop on over after what happened with gb/det. To me, both the total, and the opening line of houston +10 are both inlfated intentional, "traps" set by the books.. By no means does this mean we are both walking away with winning tickets this weekend but I am loving both 49ers and the under GL JG!
Agreed. This game should be much more controlled and defense oriented. And Love is not the same QB outdoors as he is inside a dome.
@JimmyGape 100%... Its the classic inflated total due to the prior game... another episode of recency bias... They set it higher knowing many of the public would hop on over after what happened with gb/det. To me, both the total, and the opening line of houston +10 are both inlfated intentional, "traps" set by the books.. By no means does this mean we are both walking away with winning tickets this weekend but I am loving both 49ers and the under GL JG!
Agreed. This game should be much more controlled and defense oriented. And Love is not the same QB outdoors as he is inside a dome.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.