A lot of it is luck.......
Better lucky than good 24x7.
A lot of it is luck.......
Better lucky than good 24x7.
You can’t cap a rookie QB in the playoffs who doesn’t have 8 starts under his belt that he would somehow come out and play otherworldly. Remember Eli Manning got smacked his first year in the playoffs.
You can’t cap a rookie QB in the playoffs who doesn’t have 8 starts under his belt that he would somehow come out and play otherworldly. Remember Eli Manning got smacked his first year in the playoffs.
well said MoPinkie
Course I have the Ravens
well said MoPinkie
Course I have the Ravens
12 fumbles in 7 games for Jackson. Seems pretty easy to cap that. You can expect minimum 2 from him and add in added pressure. That was easy to cap
12 fumbles in 7 games for Jackson. Seems pretty easy to cap that. You can expect minimum 2 from him and add in added pressure. That was easy to cap
The truth is that Jackson has fumbled 14 times in his last 7 games plus the first half of this game and Baltimore has recovered 10 of those. So your statement is misleading. I expect Jackson to fumble again.
The truth is that Jackson has fumbled 14 times in his last 7 games plus the first half of this game and Baltimore has recovered 10 of those. So your statement is misleading. I expect Jackson to fumble again.
I knew I saw/seen this somewhere. I'm pretty sure that I saw it on some youtube vid too..
https://books.google.com/books?id=YphDTgDsuI0C&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=oddsmakers+can%27t+account+for+turnovers&source=bl&ots=2NqPKmpGfy&sig=3zg4VL_o59vHNhxbljXzt_EtE78&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjX8sjA7tnfAhUtUt8KHeZkDXsQ6AEwAHoECAUQAQ#v=onepage&q=oddsmakers%20can't%20account%20for%20turnovers&f=false
I knew I saw/seen this somewhere. I'm pretty sure that I saw it on some youtube vid too..
https://books.google.com/books?id=YphDTgDsuI0C&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=oddsmakers+can%27t+account+for+turnovers&source=bl&ots=2NqPKmpGfy&sig=3zg4VL_o59vHNhxbljXzt_EtE78&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjX8sjA7tnfAhUtUt8KHeZkDXsQ6AEwAHoECAUQAQ#v=onepage&q=oddsmakers%20can't%20account%20for%20turnovers&f=false
well I'm on LAC Large and kicking FG's is not the recipe for a W. Baltimore is one big play from being back in this.....they just blocked a LAC FG so is this the turning point?
Again, I'm on LAC and they were the right side regardless of outcome.
well I'm on LAC Large and kicking FG's is not the recipe for a W. Baltimore is one big play from being back in this.....they just blocked a LAC FG so is this the turning point?
Again, I'm on LAC and they were the right side regardless of outcome.
Nice 4th quarter by Jackson!
But the fumble.....yeah.....I think I predicted that!
Nice 4th quarter by Jackson!
But the fumble.....yeah.....I think I predicted that!
There are teams that definitely turn the ball over more than others. A professional handicapper takes this into account (not considering myself one). They also keep track of the types of turnovers a team has had. Were poor decisions or forced? Or just random luck? The random ones should even out in the long run.
There are teams that definitely turn the ball over more than others. A professional handicapper takes this into account (not considering myself one). They also keep track of the types of turnovers a team has had. Were poor decisions or forced? Or just random luck? The random ones should even out in the long run.
A rookie qb that cant make the most basic routine throws vs Rivers a season wiley cagey vet with threats everywhere he looks at key offensive position...this really doesnt take a phd to cap
A rookie qb that cant make the most basic routine throws vs Rivers a season wiley cagey vet with threats everywhere he looks at key offensive position...this really doesnt take a phd to cap
simple average turnovers per game are part of the algorithm as is all team turnover and forced TO data......pick 6's and fumble returns for TD's cant be factored in. Kudos to those who think otherwise
simple average turnovers per game are part of the algorithm as is all team turnover and forced TO data......pick 6's and fumble returns for TD's cant be factored in. Kudos to those who think otherwise
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.