• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    THROW YOUR WIFE, KIDS, HOUSE, TURTLES AND WHEELCHAIRS ON CHARGERS

    «First Previous 123
    HoldingXYZ
    Bodogjoe
    ghpdiego
    bk1374
    AfadeAday
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 5349
    Posts: 72
    «First Previous 123
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 30, 2013 - 7:21 PM ET #51

    Sharps wait for the first group of games to get eliminated before they can unlock the mystery to bet their hard earned money into the 4pmET games... Unless if you know exactly how it would play out... Teams most likely to make it being "MIAMI" and Baltmore being last years SB CHAMPS... BOTH didnt make it... Anytime you hear MUST WIN... STATISTICALLY IT MEANS WILL LOSE
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Sharps wait for the first group of games to get eliminated before they can unlock the mystery to bet their hard earned money into the 4pmET games... Unless if you know exactly how it would play out... Teams most likely to make it being "MIAMI" and Baltmore being last years SB CHAMPS... BOTH didnt make it... Anytime you hear MUST WIN... STATISTICALLY IT MEANS WILL LOSE
     
    Bodogjoe
    Bodogjoe
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 926
    Posted: Dec. 30, 2013 - 8:08 PM ET #52

    you fool

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    you fool

     
    ghpdiego
    ghpdiego
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2012
    Posts: 278
    Posted: Dec. 30, 2013 - 8:14 PM ET #53

    Quote Originally Posted by onfireagain:

    would anyone like to donate a wheelchair

    He'll yea....just got my new Jimmie Power chair for xmas..

    Go BOLTS
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by onfireagain:

    would anyone like to donate a wheelchair

    He'll yea....just got my new Jimmie Power chair for xmas..

    Go BOLTS
     
    bk1374
    bk1374
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2011
    Posts: 7891
    Posted: Dec. 30, 2013 - 8:32 PM ET #54

    Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:

    Sharps wait for the first group of games to get eliminated before they can unlock the mystery to bet their hard earned money into the 4pmET games... Unless if you know exactly how it would play out... Teams most likely to make it being "MIAMI" and Baltmore being last years SB CHAMPS... BOTH didnt make it... Anytime you hear MUST WIN... STATISTICALLY IT MEANS WILL LOSE

    There is truth to this, of course, but I think your angle on WHY it happens might be off base.

    Teams that "need" to win, have that NEED because they are generally not that great to begin, thus being on the outside looking in.  I mean, Miami, Baltimore and Pitt all finished at 8-8.  So they are average teams that win as much as they lose.   Only SD got their win when they needed it, and not by much.  However, it should be noted in that scenario, each played an opponent that was better or on par with them.  Jets finished ahead of Miami in the year end standings.  Ravens lost to a better Bengals teams and the Steelers actually NEEDED to win to have any chance, and they did!  The Chargers squeaked by a Chiefs team resting a lot of names, but KC was still a decent team with plenty of players giving a full effort.

    But Carolina, did win when they needed it.   Yes, they were already in the playoffs, but a win got them a bye and home field playoff game, very important.  

    New Orleans also NEEDED to win to guarantee themselves a spot, as they could not be assured the Cards would not win vs the Niners. And the Saints did win, in convincing fashion.  

    Now, both of those teams played against teams with a poorer overall record, and they won games they were "supposed" to win.

    So don't tell me that these teams that "need" to win don't win, because they do sometimes.  

    It's a difficult angle to cap games to, mostly because we have no real way to determine how each team, player, or coach is going to handle the pressure of a must win game.  It varies from human to human.  I do think you have to ask yourself why is this particular team in the position they are in to begin with, and how do they match up vs. their opponent.  

    So while I agree you with that sometimes teams with this "need" to win might be good fades, it's not something you can just arbitrarily run with all the time.

    However, saying these games played out this way because of some HUGE NFL fixing scandal to get certain teams in, and others out is beyond stupid.  You guys constantly over think things, over and over and over again.  Like a broken record.  If you stopped drinking the stupid Kool-Aid and opened your eyes, you might actually see you have some decent thoughts on what might occur.

    BOL 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:

    Sharps wait for the first group of games to get eliminated before they can unlock the mystery to bet their hard earned money into the 4pmET games... Unless if you know exactly how it would play out... Teams most likely to make it being "MIAMI" and Baltmore being last years SB CHAMPS... BOTH didnt make it... Anytime you hear MUST WIN... STATISTICALLY IT MEANS WILL LOSE

    There is truth to this, of course, but I think your angle on WHY it happens might be off base.

    Teams that "need" to win, have that NEED because they are generally not that great to begin, thus being on the outside looking in.  I mean, Miami, Baltimore and Pitt all finished at 8-8.  So they are average teams that win as much as they lose.   Only SD got their win when they needed it, and not by much.  However, it should be noted in that scenario, each played an opponent that was better or on par with them.  Jets finished ahead of Miami in the year end standings.  Ravens lost to a better Bengals teams and the Steelers actually NEEDED to win to have any chance, and they did!  The Chargers squeaked by a Chiefs team resting a lot of names, but KC was still a decent team with plenty of players giving a full effort.

    But Carolina, did win when they needed it.   Yes, they were already in the playoffs, but a win got them a bye and home field playoff game, very important.  

    New Orleans also NEEDED to win to guarantee themselves a spot, as they could not be assured the Cards would not win vs the Niners. And the Saints did win, in convincing fashion.  

    Now, both of those teams played against teams with a poorer overall record, and they won games they were "supposed" to win.

    So don't tell me that these teams that "need" to win don't win, because they do sometimes.  

    It's a difficult angle to cap games to, mostly because we have no real way to determine how each team, player, or coach is going to handle the pressure of a must win game.  It varies from human to human.  I do think you have to ask yourself why is this particular team in the position they are in to begin with, and how do they match up vs. their opponent.  

    So while I agree you with that sometimes teams with this "need" to win might be good fades, it's not something you can just arbitrarily run with all the time.

    However, saying these games played out this way because of some HUGE NFL fixing scandal to get certain teams in, and others out is beyond stupid.  You guys constantly over think things, over and over and over again.  Like a broken record.  If you stopped drinking the stupid Kool-Aid and opened your eyes, you might actually see you have some decent thoughts on what might occur.

    BOL 

     
    AfadeAday
    AfadeAday
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2012
    Posts: 354
    Posted: Dec. 30, 2013 - 8:35 PM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:

    Sharps wait for the first group of games to get eliminated before they can unlock the mystery to bet their hard earned money into the 4pmET games... Unless if you know exactly how it would play out... Teams most likely to make it being "MIAMI" and Baltmore being last years SB CHAMPS... BOTH didnt make it... Anytime you hear MUST WIN... STATISTICALLY IT MEANS WILL LOSE


    Philly must win and they won...
    Chargers must win and they won...
    Packers must win and they won...


    What statistics are you looking at?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:

    Sharps wait for the first group of games to get eliminated before they can unlock the mystery to bet their hard earned money into the 4pmET games... Unless if you know exactly how it would play out... Teams most likely to make it being "MIAMI" and Baltmore being last years SB CHAMPS... BOTH didnt make it... Anytime you hear MUST WIN... STATISTICALLY IT MEANS WILL LOSE


    Philly must win and they won...
    Chargers must win and they won...
    Packers must win and they won...


    What statistics are you looking at?

     
    tuck321
    tuck321
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2002
    Posts: 20165
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 1:47 AM ET #56

    The game was fixed for the Chiefs to win and it was really, really obvious.

    But fixes aren't absolute. The league had a strong preference for Pit and the books definitely didn't want to see the Chiefs cover any of the spreads. Why Pit?

    1. Cold weather team. They get better ratings.
    2. Small market team but with a strong regional and national following, like GB.
    3. Playoffs now overloaded with western teams relative to their ratings pull. Only SF and Den have pull.

    Speaking of GB and fixes. With 11 min left GB fails to go for 2 and the tie. Going for 2 pt conversion in the 4th qtr down by 2 is by far the most efficient time to do it. But wait, nothing happens until near the end and GB gets the ball all set for the last min drive to win the game with a field goal and win by 2 as a 2.5 to 3pt fav. But hey it was 4th down and what was the receiver going to do? A pratfall so they could kick a 10yd field goal.

    And yes the league prefers GB. Chi is big market team but the inner city counts for almost zip while GB regional and national following is middle class and up.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The game was fixed for the Chiefs to win and it was really, really obvious.

    But fixes aren't absolute. The league had a strong preference for Pit and the books definitely didn't want to see the Chiefs cover any of the spreads. Why Pit?

    1. Cold weather team. They get better ratings.
    2. Small market team but with a strong regional and national following, like GB.
    3. Playoffs now overloaded with western teams relative to their ratings pull. Only SF and Den have pull.

    Speaking of GB and fixes. With 11 min left GB fails to go for 2 and the tie. Going for 2 pt conversion in the 4th qtr down by 2 is by far the most efficient time to do it. But wait, nothing happens until near the end and GB gets the ball all set for the last min drive to win the game with a field goal and win by 2 as a 2.5 to 3pt fav. But hey it was 4th down and what was the receiver going to do? A pratfall so they could kick a 10yd field goal.

    And yes the league prefers GB. Chi is big market team but the inner city counts for almost zip while GB regional and national following is middle class and up.
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 1:59 AM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by AfadeAday:



    Philly must win and they won...
    Chargers must win and they won...
    Packers must win and they won...


    What statistics are you looking at?


    PHILLY SHOULD WIN,, BUT THEY DIDNT COVER
    CHARGERS SUCKS,, THEY GOT IN... ALSO DIDNT COVER
    PACKERS MUST WIN SO DID THE BEARS,, BIGGER CITY LOST... 

    MUST WIN TEAMS THAT WON,, DIDNT COVER... 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by AfadeAday:



    Philly must win and they won...
    Chargers must win and they won...
    Packers must win and they won...


    What statistics are you looking at?


    PHILLY SHOULD WIN,, BUT THEY DIDNT COVER
    CHARGERS SUCKS,, THEY GOT IN... ALSO DIDNT COVER
    PACKERS MUST WIN SO DID THE BEARS,, BIGGER CITY LOST... 

    MUST WIN TEAMS THAT WON,, DIDNT COVER... 
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:04 AM ET #58

    Quote Originally Posted by tuck321:

    The game was fixed for the Chiefs to win and it was really, really obvious.

    But fixes aren't absolute. The league had a strong preference for Pit and the books definitely didn't want to see the Chiefs cover any of the spreads. Why Pit?

    1. Cold weather team. They get better ratings.
    2. Small market team but with a strong regional and national following, like GB.
    3. Playoffs now overloaded with western teams relative to their ratings pull. Only SF and Den have pull.

    Speaking of GB and fixes. With 11 min left GB fails to go for 2 and the tie. Going for 2 pt conversion in the 4th qtr down by 2 is by far the most efficient time to do it. But wait, nothing happens until near the end and GB gets the ball all set for the last min drive to win the game with a field goal and win by 2 as a 2.5 to 3pt fav. But hey it was 4th down and what was the receiver going to do? A pratfall so they could kick a 10yd field goal.

    And yes the league prefers GB. Chi is big market team but the inner city counts for almost zip while GB regional and national following is middle class and up.

    Chicago gave away 14 points... If you watched the game you can figure out what im saying just like TUCK321
    Blown coverage,, no whistle no dispute,, = 14 points

    If the rogers injury was a real one,, the bears took it easy on rogers,,, I dont recall him even close to being sacked ,, not once... 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by tuck321:

    The game was fixed for the Chiefs to win and it was really, really obvious.

    But fixes aren't absolute. The league had a strong preference for Pit and the books definitely didn't want to see the Chiefs cover any of the spreads. Why Pit?

    1. Cold weather team. They get better ratings.
    2. Small market team but with a strong regional and national following, like GB.
    3. Playoffs now overloaded with western teams relative to their ratings pull. Only SF and Den have pull.

    Speaking of GB and fixes. With 11 min left GB fails to go for 2 and the tie. Going for 2 pt conversion in the 4th qtr down by 2 is by far the most efficient time to do it. But wait, nothing happens until near the end and GB gets the ball all set for the last min drive to win the game with a field goal and win by 2 as a 2.5 to 3pt fav. But hey it was 4th down and what was the receiver going to do? A pratfall so they could kick a 10yd field goal.

    And yes the league prefers GB. Chi is big market team but the inner city counts for almost zip while GB regional and national following is middle class and up.

    Chicago gave away 14 points... If you watched the game you can figure out what im saying just like TUCK321
    Blown coverage,, no whistle no dispute,, = 14 points

    If the rogers injury was a real one,, the bears took it easy on rogers,,, I dont recall him even close to being sacked ,, not once... 
     
    rangerz2478
    rangerz2478
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 17830
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:05 AM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by tuck321:

    The game was fixed for the Chiefs to win and it was really, really obvious.

    But fixes aren't absolute. The league had a strong preference for Pit and the books definitely didn't want to see the Chiefs cover any of the spreads. Why Pit?

    1. Cold weather team. They get better ratings.
    2. Small market team but with a strong regional and national following, like GB.
    3. Playoffs now overloaded with western teams relative to their ratings pull. Only SF and Den have pull.

    Speaking of GB and fixes. With 11 min left GB fails to go for 2 and the tie. Going for 2 pt conversion in the 4th qtr down by 2 is by far the most efficient time to do it. But wait, nothing happens until near the end and GB gets the ball all set for the last min drive to win the game with a field goal and win by 2 as a 2.5 to 3pt fav. But hey it was 4th down and what was the receiver going to do? A pratfall so they could kick a 10yd field goal.

    And yes the league prefers GB. Chi is big market team but the inner city counts for almost zip while GB regional and national following is middle class and up.

    One guy says it was fixed for the Chargers, and another guy responds to that same thread saying it was fixed for the Chiefs. 

    Only on covers. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by tuck321:

    The game was fixed for the Chiefs to win and it was really, really obvious.

    But fixes aren't absolute. The league had a strong preference for Pit and the books definitely didn't want to see the Chiefs cover any of the spreads. Why Pit?

    1. Cold weather team. They get better ratings.
    2. Small market team but with a strong regional and national following, like GB.
    3. Playoffs now overloaded with western teams relative to their ratings pull. Only SF and Den have pull.

    Speaking of GB and fixes. With 11 min left GB fails to go for 2 and the tie. Going for 2 pt conversion in the 4th qtr down by 2 is by far the most efficient time to do it. But wait, nothing happens until near the end and GB gets the ball all set for the last min drive to win the game with a field goal and win by 2 as a 2.5 to 3pt fav. But hey it was 4th down and what was the receiver going to do? A pratfall so they could kick a 10yd field goal.

    And yes the league prefers GB. Chi is big market team but the inner city counts for almost zip while GB regional and national following is middle class and up.

    One guy says it was fixed for the Chargers, and another guy responds to that same thread saying it was fixed for the Chiefs. 

    Only on covers. 
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:07 AM ET #60

    WEEK 16 when BRADY BLOWS THE SHIZZLES OUT OF BALTIMORE,,, IN BALTIMORE,,, SHARPS WAS ALL OVER IT... 
    THEY WAITED FOR MIAMI... 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    WEEK 16 when BRADY BLOWS THE SHIZZLES OUT OF BALTIMORE,,, IN BALTIMORE,,, SHARPS WAS ALL OVER IT... 
    THEY WAITED FOR MIAMI... 
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:14 AM ET #61

    If you notice BRADY BEATS MIA,, then week15 roles around they lose to mia,,, then week 16 roles around and they blow out the ravens at home,, Sharps waited for mia to lose first at 1pmET,, then SHARPS TOOK Brady and BRADY kicks the ravens in the face like bruce lee just entered the body... You notice how the schedules are set?




    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    If you notice BRADY BEATS MIA,, then week15 roles around they lose to mia,,, then week 16 roles around and they blow out the ravens at home,, Sharps waited for mia to lose first at 1pmET,, then SHARPS TOOK Brady and BRADY kicks the ravens in the face like bruce lee just entered the body... You notice how the schedules are set?




     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:17 AM ET #62

    If you notice,, the bills kicked bradys face in buffalo earlier,, week17 roles around and the favor is returned,, public took the points at +7.5 knowing brady isnt that trust worthy against divisional opponents... And what happends? Brady kicks the shizzle out of the bills... 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    If you notice,, the bills kicked bradys face in buffalo earlier,, week17 roles around and the favor is returned,, public took the points at +7.5 knowing brady isnt that trust worthy against divisional opponents... And what happends? Brady kicks the shizzle out of the bills... 
     
    DMCTwoThree
    DMCTwoThree
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2013
    Posts: 49
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:28 AM ET #63

    HELL YES THEY FIXED THE darn OUT THE CHIEFS BOLTS GAME. TAKE THE 40-1 ODDS ON CHARGERS TO WIN IT ALL.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    HELL YES THEY FIXED THE darn OUT THE CHIEFS BOLTS GAME. TAKE THE 40-1 ODDS ON CHARGERS TO WIN IT ALL.
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:47 AM ET #64

    Sharps wait for the first group of games to get eliminated before they can unlock the mystery to bet their hard earned money into the 4pmET games... Unless if you know exactly how it would play out... Teams most likely to make it being "MIAMI" and Baltmore being last years SB CHAMPS... BOTH didnt make it... Anytime you hear MUST WIN... STATISTICALLY IT MEANS WILL LOSE

    AND ANYTIME YOU HEAR MUST WIN AND THE FAVORITE DOES WIN,, THEY DO NOT COVER... WAY MORE OFTEN THAN NOT,, BUT ITS ALL OF THOSE CHAIN OF REACTIONS THAT BITE JOE-PUB IN THE ARSE THAT MAKES THIS THE MOST INTERESTING...  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Sharps wait for the first group of games to get eliminated before they can unlock the mystery to bet their hard earned money into the 4pmET games... Unless if you know exactly how it would play out... Teams most likely to make it being "MIAMI" and Baltmore being last years SB CHAMPS... BOTH didnt make it... Anytime you hear MUST WIN... STATISTICALLY IT MEANS WILL LOSE

    AND ANYTIME YOU HEAR MUST WIN AND THE FAVORITE DOES WIN,, THEY DO NOT COVER... WAY MORE OFTEN THAN NOT,, BUT ITS ALL OF THOSE CHAIN OF REACTIONS THAT BITE JOE-PUB IN THE ARSE THAT MAKES THIS THE MOST INTERESTING...  
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:48 AM ET #65

    DONT KNOW ABOUT YOU GUYS,, BUT I DONT LIKE GETTING BITTEN IN THE ARSE.. LOL FADE THE NEWS BOYS
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    DONT KNOW ABOUT YOU GUYS,, BUT I DONT LIKE GETTING BITTEN IN THE ARSE.. LOL FADE THE NEWS BOYS
     
    rangerz2478
    rangerz2478
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 17830
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:55 AM ET #66

    Quote Originally Posted by DMCTwoThree:

    HELL YES THEY FIXED THE darn OUT THE CHIEFS BOLTS GAME. TAKE THE 40-1 ODDS ON CHARGERS TO WIN IT ALL.

    Yea go take 40-1 when they're worth probably double that. You're a bookies dream. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by DMCTwoThree:

    HELL YES THEY FIXED THE darn OUT THE CHIEFS BOLTS GAME. TAKE THE 40-1 ODDS ON CHARGERS TO WIN IT ALL.

    Yea go take 40-1 when they're worth probably double that. You're a bookies dream. 
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 2:58 AM ET #67

    Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:


    Yea go take 40-1 when they're worth probably double that. You're a bookies dream. 

    lol
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:


    Yea go take 40-1 when they're worth probably double that. You're a bookies dream. 

    lol
     
    HookEmHorns22
    HookEmHorns22
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2011
    Posts: 22266
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 3:08 AM ET #68

    Quote Originally Posted by tuck321:

    The game was fixed for the Chiefs to win and it was really, really obvious.

    But fixes aren't absolute. The league had a strong preference for Pit and the books definitely didn't want to see the Chiefs cover any of the spreads. Why Pit?

    1. Cold weather team. They get better ratings.
    2. Small market team but with a strong regional and national following, like GB.
    3. Playoffs now overloaded with western teams relative to their ratings pull. Only SF and Den have pull.

    Speaking of GB and fixes. With 11 min left GB fails to go for 2 and the tie. Going for 2 pt conversion in the 4th qtr down by 2 is by far the most efficient time to do it. But wait, nothing happens until near the end and GB gets the ball all set for the last min drive to win the game with a field goal and win by 2 as a 2.5 to 3pt fav. But hey it was 4th down and what was the receiver going to do? A pratfall so they could kick a 10yd field goal.

    And yes the league prefers GB. Chi is big market team but the inner city counts for almost zip while GB regional and national following is middle class and up.

    For starters are you saying Bears fans are lower class?

    And second what does where the team is located have to do with anything. You've obviously never been to a Bears game before. It's all the rich people from the suburbs. Just because they play in Chicago it has NOTHING to do with anything

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by tuck321:

    The game was fixed for the Chiefs to win and it was really, really obvious.

    But fixes aren't absolute. The league had a strong preference for Pit and the books definitely didn't want to see the Chiefs cover any of the spreads. Why Pit?

    1. Cold weather team. They get better ratings.
    2. Small market team but with a strong regional and national following, like GB.
    3. Playoffs now overloaded with western teams relative to their ratings pull. Only SF and Den have pull.

    Speaking of GB and fixes. With 11 min left GB fails to go for 2 and the tie. Going for 2 pt conversion in the 4th qtr down by 2 is by far the most efficient time to do it. But wait, nothing happens until near the end and GB gets the ball all set for the last min drive to win the game with a field goal and win by 2 as a 2.5 to 3pt fav. But hey it was 4th down and what was the receiver going to do? A pratfall so they could kick a 10yd field goal.

    And yes the league prefers GB. Chi is big market team but the inner city counts for almost zip while GB regional and national following is middle class and up.

    For starters are you saying Bears fans are lower class?

    And second what does where the team is located have to do with anything. You've obviously never been to a Bears game before. It's all the rich people from the suburbs. Just because they play in Chicago it has NOTHING to do with anything

     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 3:41 AM ET #69

    Bears fans are actually higher class in a sense that its a bigger city with more money,, more people ,, more jobs,, more action on the bears... Books love bears backers,,, Books hate Gb backers in most cases... 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Bears fans are actually higher class in a sense that its a bigger city with more money,, more people ,, more jobs,, more action on the bears... Books love bears backers,,, Books hate Gb backers in most cases... 
     
    tuck321
    tuck321
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2002
    Posts: 20165
    Posted: Dec. 31, 2013 - 12:54 PM ET #70

    Quote Originally Posted by HookEmHorns22:


    For starters are you saying Bears fans are lower class?

    And second what does where the team is located have to do with anything. You've obviously never been to a Bears game before. It's all the rich people from the suburbs. Just because they play in Chicago it has NOTHING to do with anything

    It's not about the game attendance. It's about ratings, sponsors, and how much advertising reaches people with disposable income. The GB "diaspora" reaches more disposable income than the Chi burbs.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HookEmHorns22:


    For starters are you saying Bears fans are lower class?

    And second what does where the team is located have to do with anything. You've obviously never been to a Bears game before. It's all the rich people from the suburbs. Just because they play in Chicago it has NOTHING to do with anything

    It's not about the game attendance. It's about ratings, sponsors, and how much advertising reaches people with disposable income. The GB "diaspora" reaches more disposable income than the Chi burbs.

     
    BostonCelticFTW
    BostonCelticFTW
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2012
    Posts: 1142
    Posted: Jan. 2, 2014 - 12:37 PM ET #71

    Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:


    What are you talking about?

    If this game was fixed for SD to win, NO WAY it goes to OT, and NO WAY KC is lined up to kick a make-able FG at the end of the game.  NO WAY!

    Do you even listen to yourself think??

    Again, YOU KNEW the Chargers would get in, and YOU ONLY SAID SO AFTER THE DOLPHINS AND RAVENS LOST SUNDAY!  You dip$hit.  Where is your Jets ML + Bengals ML + Chargers ML parlay ticket? 

    At the time you made your ridiculous declaration the Chargers were 15.5 faves against back ups, and STILL ALMOST LOST.  But yes, you were right that the Chargers won.  And based on your bold statements, you are lying to yourself if you thought it would go down that way.

    You're delusional as they come.  And really just flat out stupid from every angle.

    Keep over-thinking things you moron.



    I didnt know 100% sure that Chargers would get into the playoffs. Thats why i didnt make that prediction. What i did know tho, was the fact that Chargers who

    Who the darn cares if a team gets ahead with 20 points, 30 points or 40 points? You think that matters a brick shiat in the NFL? It doesnt, if NFL wants you to win, you can be sure as hell that you will win too. Watch a game like Pats - Broncos, Broncos ahead LARGE, and how many can legitimately get back against the Broncos when they have a QB that can score on every single drive? Not many i can tell you. But still happpened coz NFL wanted it to happen. So thats what happened here, doesnt matter that KC showed up to play, when NFL wants SD to win, they will win. So idc whats happening in the game. You see my comments when they were down? I was careless and i can only laugh at every single comment ticking in while KC were ahead, all these sheep thinking KC would actually pull it off. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:


    What are you talking about?

    If this game was fixed for SD to win, NO WAY it goes to OT, and NO WAY KC is lined up to kick a make-able FG at the end of the game.  NO WAY!

    Do you even listen to yourself think??

    Again, YOU KNEW the Chargers would get in, and YOU ONLY SAID SO AFTER THE DOLPHINS AND RAVENS LOST SUNDAY!  You dip$hit.  Where is your Jets ML + Bengals ML + Chargers ML parlay ticket? 

    At the time you made your ridiculous declaration the Chargers were 15.5 faves against back ups, and STILL ALMOST LOST.  But yes, you were right that the Chargers won.  And based on your bold statements, you are lying to yourself if you thought it would go down that way.

    You're delusional as they come.  And really just flat out stupid from every angle.

    Keep over-thinking things you moron.



    I didnt know 100% sure that Chargers would get into the playoffs. Thats why i didnt make that prediction. What i did know tho, was the fact that Chargers who

    Who the darn cares if a team gets ahead with 20 points, 30 points or 40 points? You think that matters a brick shiat in the NFL? It doesnt, if NFL wants you to win, you can be sure as hell that you will win too. Watch a game like Pats - Broncos, Broncos ahead LARGE, and how many can legitimately get back against the Broncos when they have a QB that can score on every single drive? Not many i can tell you. But still happpened coz NFL wanted it to happen. So thats what happened here, doesnt matter that KC showed up to play, when NFL wants SD to win, they will win. So idc whats happening in the game. You see my comments when they were down? I was careless and i can only laugh at every single comment ticking in while KC were ahead, all these sheep thinking KC would actually pull it off. 
     
     
    HoldingXYZ
    HoldingXYZ
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 6667
    Posted: Jan. 2, 2014 - 2:27 PM ET #72

    Agreed. 

    But most importantly. Bang the books. They are so afraid of readers here. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Agreed. 

    But most importantly. Bang the books. They are so afraid of readers here. 
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,393 Covers arrow
    • Sunday 09/20/2026 574 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 259,618 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 174 Covers arrow
    • Colts vs chiefs in-game live 1,706 Covers arrow
    • Flawed Logic: and Bad Decisions: NFL Edition 4,225 Covers arrow
    • Dogs biting today? 3,949 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 99,244 Covers arrow
    • _📌 😎 Fubah's bets for NFL 2026: Week 02 🚩🚩 10,551 Covers arrow
    • Philadelphia Eagles @ Tennessee Titans 5,439 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.