Last spam of this thread but that Luck TD not being reviewed was extremely strange.
Now the Cecil Shorts clear reception being over turned. Not saying fix, but this is getting ridiculous.
Good call Known - good play.
They did review it. They watched it once and didn't feel like they needed to stop play. Shorts lost the ball as he went down. He must maintain possession.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rambler882:
Last spam of this thread but that Luck TD not being reviewed was extremely strange.
Now the Cecil Shorts clear reception being over turned. Not saying fix, but this is getting ridiculous.
Good call Known - good play.
They did review it. They watched it once and didn't feel like they needed to stop play. Shorts lost the ball as he went down. He must maintain possession.
They did review it. They watched it once and didn't feel like they needed to stop play. Shorts lost the ball as he went down. He must maintain possession.
The Luck TD, you could clearly see the ball was being juggled as it got knocked loose. Therefore, when it did cross the line he did not have complete control. My point was they should have taken a closer look on such a key play especially when you could clearly see the ball being knocked loose.
The Shorts play was a catch. He got two feet in, and the third step was out of bounds. At that point the ball came loose when he was falling down and eventually hit the ground.
Strange calls/plays, I don't really buy into "fixes" so I was not implying that. Just seemed that the Colts got the benefit of the doubt across the board.
I knew I was taking a big gamble on the Jags but sometimes you gotta pay to teach yourself a lesson! Thank goodness for in-game wagering.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lightsout2184:
They did review it. They watched it once and didn't feel like they needed to stop play. Shorts lost the ball as he went down. He must maintain possession.
The Luck TD, you could clearly see the ball was being juggled as it got knocked loose. Therefore, when it did cross the line he did not have complete control. My point was they should have taken a closer look on such a key play especially when you could clearly see the ball being knocked loose.
The Shorts play was a catch. He got two feet in, and the third step was out of bounds. At that point the ball came loose when he was falling down and eventually hit the ground.
Strange calls/plays, I don't really buy into "fixes" so I was not implying that. Just seemed that the Colts got the benefit of the doubt across the board.
I knew I was taking a big gamble on the Jags but sometimes you gotta pay to teach yourself a lesson! Thank goodness for in-game wagering.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.