All Forums | NFL Betting

to all you JETS backers...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2384
Posts: 41
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 834
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by TicTac_Bucinski:

Jets will run the ball down the Colts freaking throat.  Jets are the shit running the ball and Colts have no run D.  Also Jets are kick ass on D, Colts are horrible at running the ball and the Jets have the 3rd best run D in the league.

Sorry but this is not 2009.  

right on my man .. perfectly said!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 96
Posted: #27

May be one of the least persuasive arguments on covers.com.

Half of your facts are dead wrong and you are an idiot.

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #28
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 75
Posted: #29
I dont understand why people keep saying the Jets will run the ball down the Colts throats, when the Colts run D gave up less than 50 yards to CJ and the raiders who are a top 3 team in rushing barely did shit on the ground.  The Colts weakness is their secondary with Hayden and Powers banged up.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 128
Posted: #30
I'll be watching this closely.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 152
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by ryanchwedchuk:

I dont understand why people keep saying the Jets will run the ball down the Colts throats, when the Colts run D gave up less than 50 yards to CJ and the raiders who are a top 3 team in rushing barely did shit on the ground.  The Colts weakness is their secondary with Hayden and Powers banged up.

I thought the official stat was 80 yds to the Raiders and not 50?  Either way it's impressive.  In addition they gave up less than 70 yds to Jags another top 3 team in rushing.  They also gave up close to 200 yds to Eagles a top 5 team in rushing.  These are all single games overall for the season they are ranked 25th in rush defense.  The Jets are ranked 4th in rush offense.  This does not match up well for the Colts.  

Anything is possible this weekend especially with Peyton but I think it's slightly more likely that the Colts don't cover this game.  I could easily be wrong.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 75
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by TicTac_Bucinski:


I thought the official stat was 80 yds to the Raiders and not 50?  Either way it's impressive.  In addition they gave up less than 70 yds to Jags another top 3 team in rushing.  They also gave up close to 200 yds to Eagles a top 5 team in rushing.  These are all single games overall for the season they are ranked 25th in rush defense.  The Jets are ranked 4th in rush offense.  This does not match up well for the Colts.  

Anything is possible this weekend especially with Peyton but I think it's slightly more likely that the Colts don't cover this game.  I could easily be wrong.  

Sorry I missed a comma there.  I meant to say the the raiders did not run the ball well against them.  I know the Titans, Raiders and Jags games are all single games, but those are 3 consecutive games heading into the playoffs, so it looks like the run D has finally been adressed.  I'm not sure of the stats, but didn't the Colts hold the Jets run game in check last year in the playoffs?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2300
Posted: #33

This a completely different team on both sides primarily Indy's side.  Indy whether anyone wants to believe it or not is missing a lot of key players but nobody wants to acknowledge this fact becasue we all focus on manning which is obvious yet not the clear way to look at this matchup.

Colts have been doing it w/ smoke and mirrors eeking out gutty wins last few weeks but really who have they beat?  Manning just does not have his weapons.  Wayne will be an afterthought in this game as will Garcon.  There hope is up the middle w/ Tamme and addai out of backfield and Jets know this.  Jets back to ground/pound and rolling pockets using Sanchez at his strongest on the move.  This aint the same Colts team as last year or earlier this year for that matter.  To underestimate the value of Collie and Clark who are Mannings security blankets is foolish 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 152
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by ryanchwedchuk:

I dont understand why people keep saying the Jets will run the ball down the Colts throats,

I keep saying this because hell it's just fun to type.  Whether it panes out that way, we'll see.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by luckbird:

Uh, they went up against them in the AFC title game, not the first round dipshit


And he leads off his argument with something that was made up.



The Jets were in one of the worst spots you can find a team in last year against the Colts. This year? Its completely different.

Its awful telling that you can get Peyton at home at less than a FG in the playoffs.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 35
Posted: #36
27-13 J-E-T-S JETSJETSJETS!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 35
Posted: #37
27-13 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS! IM NOT BIASED
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 6009
Posted: #38

Guys,

 

Just take the over. The Jets D is crap compared to last year and Manning will get the ball in the end zone as will the jets.

dont waste time picking a side.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 35
Posted: #39

maydaymalone i do agree with u on the over. I see a lot of big plays on fast track in dome.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5105
Posted: #40
colts are luckboxes due to the fact jacksonville imploded ,and have had superbowl loser hangover most of year w/injuries and manning throwing to other team a lot , there d line has stepped up, but jets are built to win on road and i dont see colts o and manning scaring that vaunted jets defense
rex takes boys up to indy and gets victory
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 22937
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by amadrx8:

May be one of the least persuasive arguments on covers.com.

Half of your facts are dead wrong and you are an idiot.

 

 

I can see by your posts that your main goal in life is to be an ass. At least you are consistant!

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.