All Forums | NFL Betting

### Trust Issues ###

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 8428
Posts: 36
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #1
Preseason season 5-2
Regular Season 16-10





### Big Wussie Play ###




Washington +4.5(-110)




Do or die time here. Cousins has averaged over 300+ yards thus far in his two losses while Eli has been in the +200 range with all his weapons. Washington is 0-2 while my Gmen are 2-0 so if Washington wants to stay in the division race its now or never. Washington averages 23 points per game while the Gmen average 18. Washington lost to dallas, Gmen beat dallas so the law of our division say Washington beats Gmen. Back later with more...

As always...
(corn)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 5320
Posted: #2
i diget wusse
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 3171
Posted: #3
not a savior
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 1004
Posted: #4
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 5252
Posted: #5
Same side. GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 2892
Posted: #6
Thanks buddy always tail your big wussie plays.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #7
Taking a long look at buffalo or Philly as possible plays. One will fit my home dog getting the most points rule which is 2-0 this far this season..
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 618
Posted: #8
That is the worst reasoning I've ever heard, the law of our division? Giants D looks great and they are at home against a team that is bashing their own QB publicly in week 3 of the season. GL but have to back the Giants in this spot at home.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 45951
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:

Taking a long look at buffalo or Philly as possible plays. One will fit my home dog getting the most points rule which is 2-0 this far this season..
Are you basing this number on the opening or closing number? Last weekend the Rams were the biggest home dog on Sunday and I noticed you were on the Browns. I see you're waiting on these lines so i'll assume you are using the closing lines?? Which made the Rams the team under that theory last weekend. Just curious and looking for clarification on your thought process here, thanks. Either way the appoach is 2-0, I myself was on the Rams as my biggest play of the season last weekend and myself also enjoy taking the largest home dog as long as they fit a couple other criteria
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #10
Polar Bear,

I usually go off the opening number and am only waiting this week because Philly and buffalo opened at +6. Those numbers are long gone but I'm thinking the play is buffalo after all the general public money comes in on Arizona later in the week. I like buffalo for other reasons too like Arizona having to fly west to east for an early start and the fact they just came off a blowout win to name a few. Will dig deeper as the week progresses. Good luck on whomever you choose
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #11
Jacksonville +100


The jags are a far better team then what their pitiful 0-2 record reflects. They're also at home and if you can remember back to week one you've seen them play GB to a One possession game. Baltimore is not a three and zero team, period. Jags win this one at home in the heat..
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 13606
Posted: #12
BOL WUSSIE 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 9679
Posted: #13
GL this week wussie.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 47692
Posted: #14
GL Wus
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by dogeatdog:

IMO Bortles is a choke. He can't handle good defenses. I like the under because both teams are offensively challenged.


Since when has Baltimore become a good defense? Must have missed that memo...
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 45951
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:

Polar Bear,I usually go off the opening number and am only waiting this week because Philly and buffalo opened at +6. Those numbers are long gone but I'm thinking the play is buffalo after all the general public money comes in on Arizona later in the week. I like buffalo for other reasons too like Arizona having to fly west to east for an early start and the fact they just came off a blowout win to name a few. Will dig deeper as the week progresses. Good luck on whomever you choose

OK....Thanks for responding.
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 29027
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:

Jacksonville +100


The jags are a far better team then what their pitiful 0-2 record reflects. They're also at home and if you can remember back to week one you've seen them play GB to a One possession game. Baltimore is not a three and zero team, period. Jags win this one at home in the heat..

Are the Jags act better than their record?  Lose at home to an overrated Packers team, then was trailing 35-0 in San Diego.  Bortles was a train wreck for majority of the game.  I just trust the Ravens more in a potentially close game to pull it out.  Not sure if I'm betting the Ravens yet, but def not on the Jags.  Good luck, regardless.  
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 755
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Ant914:

That is the worst reasoning I've ever heard, the law of our division? Giants D looks great and they are at home against a team that is bashing their own QB publicly in week 3 of the season. GL but have to back the Giants in this spot at home.

You obviously don't follow the NFC East.  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #19
Papa, back Baltimore and you'll be sorry. They have to lose a game This year, preseason included. They're due. Plus the jags beat them last year, and this team is vastly improved over that one.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #20
Cincinnati -3(-110)

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #21
Wanted to back buffalo, still may but the value is fine at 3.5
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #22
Dogeatdog, them bullshiit stat dont mean nothing. They're vs the bills and browns!! Jacksonville will score, i promise you that as a fact. Good luck backing them on the road in this florida heat...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 1004
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by dogeatdog:

BAL defense rankings
PTS
13.5 
(3rd)
YDS
273.5 
(2nd)
PASS YDS
168.5 
(2nd)
RUSH YDS
105.0 
(15th)





please tell me your trolling.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 21568
Posted: #24
gl wuss...like the jags and cincy too   
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by tito40:

gl wuss...like the jags and cincy too


Those are winners... Looking for a parlay now
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.