I can see you're confused. Vegas doesn't make predictions and because they don't, they can never "right" or "wrong."
The line/pointspread initially set out by any sportsbook/bookmaker/casino is not and never was a prediction of the final score.
With a line of -3, "Vegas" was not predicting a Kansas City victory at all, let alone a victory by three points.
The pointspread is simply a number with the intention of generating equal action on both sides. (Yes folks, it really is.) After the line is initially set, it's the betting public who will then be responsible for the line. If too much action comes in on one side, the line will be adjusted to help sway action on the other side.
Even if "Vegas" had a crystal ball, and "knew" ahead of time the final score would be 21-13 KC, they would still have set the line at KC -3. They really do want equal action on both sides. They really don't care which team wins and which team loses.
Sure, at times they will have slightly more action from the betting public on one side and will take a bath. And just as often they will have slightly more action on the other side and will clean up.
They survive by the juice they charge. They survive with a low variance... which they can get with equal action on both sides.
"Vegas" wasn't trying to fool you... but you did exactly what you should have. If you like the Raiders and the points, then you bet the Raiders and take the points. Lots of other people did too.
Don't look into it more than what it is.
(Oh, and there's no such thing as a "trap game" simply because no one is trying to "trap" you.)
0
I can see you're confused. Vegas doesn't make predictions and because they don't, they can never "right" or "wrong."
The line/pointspread initially set out by any sportsbook/bookmaker/casino is not and never was a prediction of the final score.
With a line of -3, "Vegas" was not predicting a Kansas City victory at all, let alone a victory by three points.
The pointspread is simply a number with the intention of generating equal action on both sides. (Yes folks, it really is.) After the line is initially set, it's the betting public who will then be responsible for the line. If too much action comes in on one side, the line will be adjusted to help sway action on the other side.
Even if "Vegas" had a crystal ball, and "knew" ahead of time the final score would be 21-13 KC, they would still have set the line at KC -3. They really do want equal action on both sides. They really don't care which team wins and which team loses.
Sure, at times they will have slightly more action from the betting public on one side and will take a bath. And just as often they will have slightly more action on the other side and will clean up.
They survive by the juice they charge. They survive with a low variance... which they can get with equal action on both sides.
"Vegas" wasn't trying to fool you... but you did exactly what you should have. If you like the Raiders and the points, then you bet the Raiders and take the points. Lots of other people did too.
Don't look into it more than what it is.
(Oh, and there's no such thing as a "trap game" simply because no one is trying to "trap" you.)
I can see you're confused. Vegas doesn't make predictions and because they don't, they can never "right" or "wrong."
The line/pointspread initially set out by any sportsbook/bookmaker/casino is not and never was a prediction of the final score.
With a line of -3, "Vegas" was not predicting a Kansas City victory at all, let alone a victory by three points.
The pointspread is simply a number with the intention of generating equal action on both sides. (Yes folks, it really is.) After the line is initially set, it's the betting public who will then be responsible for the line. If too much action comes in on one side, the line will be adjusted to help sway action on the other side.
Even if "Vegas" had a crystal ball, and "knew" ahead of time the final score would be 21-13 KC, they would still have set the line at KC -3. They really do want equal action on both sides. They really don't care which team wins and which team loses.
Sure, at times they will have slightly more action from the betting public on one side and will take a bath. And just as often they will have slightly more action on the other side and will clean up.
They survive by the juice they charge. They survive with a low variance... which they can get with equal action on both sides.
"Vegas" wasn't trying to fool you... but you did exactly what you should have. If you like the Raiders and the points, then you bet the Raiders and take the points. Lots of other people did too.
Don't look into it more than what it is.
(Oh, and there's no such thing as a "trap game" simply because no one is trying to "trap" you.)
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ed-Collins:
I can see you're confused. Vegas doesn't make predictions and because they don't, they can never "right" or "wrong."
The line/pointspread initially set out by any sportsbook/bookmaker/casino is not and never was a prediction of the final score.
With a line of -3, "Vegas" was not predicting a Kansas City victory at all, let alone a victory by three points.
The pointspread is simply a number with the intention of generating equal action on both sides. (Yes folks, it really is.) After the line is initially set, it's the betting public who will then be responsible for the line. If too much action comes in on one side, the line will be adjusted to help sway action on the other side.
Even if "Vegas" had a crystal ball, and "knew" ahead of time the final score would be 21-13 KC, they would still have set the line at KC -3. They really do want equal action on both sides. They really don't care which team wins and which team loses.
Sure, at times they will have slightly more action from the betting public on one side and will take a bath. And just as often they will have slightly more action on the other side and will clean up.
They survive by the juice they charge. They survive with a low variance... which they can get with equal action on both sides.
"Vegas" wasn't trying to fool you... but you did exactly what you should have. If you like the Raiders and the points, then you bet the Raiders and take the points. Lots of other people did too.
Don't look into it more than what it is.
(Oh, and there's no such thing as a "trap game" simply because no one is trying to "trap" you.)
I can see you're confused. Vegas doesn't make predictions and because they don't, they can never "right" or "wrong."The line/pointspread initially set out by any sportsbook/bookmaker/casino is not and never was a prediction of the final score. With a line of -3, "Vegas" was not predicting a Kansas City victory at all, let alone a victory by three points.The pointspread is simply a number with the intention of generating equal action on both sides. (Yes folks, it really is.) After the line is initially set, it's the betting public who will then be responsible for the line. If too much action comes in on one side, the line will be adjusted to help sway action on the other side.Even if "Vegas" had a crystal ball, and "knew" ahead of time the final score would be 21-13 KC, they would still have set the line at KC -3. They really do want equal action on both sides. They really don't care which team wins and which team loses. Sure, at times they will have slightly more action from the betting public on one side and will take a bath. And just as often they will have slightly more action on the other side and will clean up.They survive by the juice they charge. They survive with a low variance... which they can get with equal action on both sides."Vegas" wasn't trying to fool you... but you did exactly what you should have. If you like the Raiders and the points, then you bet the Raiders and take the points. Lots of other people did too.Don't look into it more than what it is. (Oh, and there's no such thing as a "trap game" simply because no one is trying to "trap" you.)
If Vegas had a crystal ball they would have set the line at +7.5 and cleaned house with 97% on the Raiders.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ed-Collins:
I can see you're confused. Vegas doesn't make predictions and because they don't, they can never "right" or "wrong."The line/pointspread initially set out by any sportsbook/bookmaker/casino is not and never was a prediction of the final score. With a line of -3, "Vegas" was not predicting a Kansas City victory at all, let alone a victory by three points.The pointspread is simply a number with the intention of generating equal action on both sides. (Yes folks, it really is.) After the line is initially set, it's the betting public who will then be responsible for the line. If too much action comes in on one side, the line will be adjusted to help sway action on the other side.Even if "Vegas" had a crystal ball, and "knew" ahead of time the final score would be 21-13 KC, they would still have set the line at KC -3. They really do want equal action on both sides. They really don't care which team wins and which team loses. Sure, at times they will have slightly more action from the betting public on one side and will take a bath. And just as often they will have slightly more action on the other side and will clean up.They survive by the juice they charge. They survive with a low variance... which they can get with equal action on both sides."Vegas" wasn't trying to fool you... but you did exactly what you should have. If you like the Raiders and the points, then you bet the Raiders and take the points. Lots of other people did too.Don't look into it more than what it is. (Oh, and there's no such thing as a "trap game" simply because no one is trying to "trap" you.)
If Vegas had a crystal ball they would have set the line at +7.5 and cleaned house with 97% on the Raiders.
TOO MUCH MONEY WAS ON RAIDERS LAST NIGHT....I HAVE WATCHED EVERY GAME....NEVER HAVE THEY GOTTEN SO MANY GIFTS AND NOT CAME AWAY WITH MORE THAN 3 POINTS. PENALTY ON PUNT COST 6 POINTS WITH PUNT TEAM GASSED. HALFTIME RAIDERS WON HOLDING KC TO 0 POINTS. YOU EITHER HAD OAKLAND AND OVER OR KC AND THE UNDER.....FUNNY THINGS HAPPEN ON NIGHT GAMES MEN...RAIDERS BENEFITTED AGAINST DENVER AND HOUSTON. RAIDERS COULD HAVE AND SHOULD HAVE WON. DESPITE CARR NOT BEING IN RIGHT ZIP CODE. OLINEMAN SCRATCHED AT LAST MINUTE AND 2 DL MISSING REMINDED ME OF SUPER BOWL AGAINST TAMPA BAY....
0
TOO MUCH MONEY WAS ON RAIDERS LAST NIGHT....I HAVE WATCHED EVERY GAME....NEVER HAVE THEY GOTTEN SO MANY GIFTS AND NOT CAME AWAY WITH MORE THAN 3 POINTS. PENALTY ON PUNT COST 6 POINTS WITH PUNT TEAM GASSED. HALFTIME RAIDERS WON HOLDING KC TO 0 POINTS. YOU EITHER HAD OAKLAND AND OVER OR KC AND THE UNDER.....FUNNY THINGS HAPPEN ON NIGHT GAMES MEN...RAIDERS BENEFITTED AGAINST DENVER AND HOUSTON. RAIDERS COULD HAVE AND SHOULD HAVE WON. DESPITE CARR NOT BEING IN RIGHT ZIP CODE. OLINEMAN SCRATCHED AT LAST MINUTE AND 2 DL MISSING REMINDED ME OF SUPER BOWL AGAINST TAMPA BAY....
I don't know why you're laughing. Aren't you the guy last year that said to bet on Team C in the afternoon against Team D, but only if Team A covers against Team B in the morning. And yet if Team B covers the spread against Team A in morning, THEN you bet on Team D in the afternoon, against Team C!
The games were not related in any way.
I said it before and I'll say it again. That is not how you handicap games.
Aren't you the guy that bet 54 units on a game a couple of weeks ago, attempting to cover your losses from the earlier games that same weekend? Do you have any concept of what a unit is?
Didn't that 54 unit game lose also?
My post above was accurate and if you don't think so, it is apparent you still know nothing about handicapping.
236
0
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:
I don't know why you're laughing. Aren't you the guy last year that said to bet on Team C in the afternoon against Team D, but only if Team A covers against Team B in the morning. And yet if Team B covers the spread against Team A in morning, THEN you bet on Team D in the afternoon, against Team C!
The games were not related in any way.
I said it before and I'll say it again. That is not how you handicap games.
Aren't you the guy that bet 54 units on a game a couple of weeks ago, attempting to cover your losses from the earlier games that same weekend? Do you have any concept of what a unit is?
Didn't that 54 unit game lose also?
My post above was accurate and if you don't think so, it is apparent you still know nothing about handicapping.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.