anchors:
LV under 52
ATL over 39.5
CLE +13
satellites
1. CAR un 52
2. TENN +3
3. NYG +11.5
4. DALL +11.5
5. SF +3
6. NYJ +13
7. CINC un 56
8. CHI ov 36
9. NYG ov 33.5
10. LAC ov 36
11. LAR +11
12. LAC +10
anchors:
LV under 52
ATL over 39.5
CLE +13
satellites
1. CAR un 52
2. TENN +3
3. NYG +11.5
4. DALL +11.5
5. SF +3
6. NYJ +13
7. CINC un 56
8. CHI ov 36
9. NYG ov 33.5
10. LAC ov 36
11. LAR +11
12. LAC +10
anchors:
LV under 52
ATL over 39.5
CLE +13
satellites
1. CAR un 52
2. TENN +3
3. NYG +11.5
4. DALL +11.5
5. SF +3
6. NYJ +13
7. CINC un 56
8. CHI ov 36
9. NYG ov 33.5
10. LAC ov 36
11. LAR +11
12. LAC +10
EACH anchor is tied to EACH satellite in a 2 team teaser....many many plays,as you can tell by my YTD record.
This is NOT for the football cappers bit rather the number guys. My data suggested that 58% was doable for 450+ plays.
Been over performing thusfar.
EACH anchor is tied to EACH satellite in a 2 team teaser....many many plays,as you can tell by my YTD record.
This is NOT for the football cappers bit rather the number guys. My data suggested that 58% was doable for 450+ plays.
Been over performing thusfar.
It’s a very simple concept. The anchor is tied to every satellite. Right now he has 19 satellites posted. Each individual anchor will be tied to all 19 satellites in 2 team teasers. 3 anchors x 19 satellites = 57 wagers.
p.s - The lines that he has posted for each game represent a 6 point move based on a two team teaser.
It’s a very simple concept. The anchor is tied to every satellite. Right now he has 19 satellites posted. Each individual anchor will be tied to all 19 satellites in 2 team teasers. 3 anchors x 19 satellites = 57 wagers.
p.s - The lines that he has posted for each game represent a 6 point move based on a two team teaser.
Correct, in some cases the teasers are 6.5 to capture the prime numbers, my juice is -115 to -123.
Correct, in some cases the teasers are 6.5 to capture the prime numbers, my juice is -115 to -123.
anchors:
LV under 52
ATL over 39.5
CLE +13
so if I'm understanding correctly if for some reason all 3 of these 'anchors' lost, then all of the combinations of 2 team teasers (57 bets) would also lose? There is a possibility that your bankroll could be severely devastated if that were to happen I'm assuming.
anchors:
LV under 52
ATL over 39.5
CLE +13
so if I'm understanding correctly if for some reason all 3 of these 'anchors' lost, then all of the combinations of 2 team teasers (57 bets) would also lose? There is a possibility that your bankroll could be severely devastated if that were to happen I'm assuming.
Yes, your math is correct, as I said earlier this system is problematic if you choose BAD ANCHORS.
Yes, your math is correct, as I said earlier this system is problematic if you choose BAD ANCHORS.
Good stuff - I tease a lot myself and have been doing well this year. Can play both ends of one game as I did w Denver/Browns last week. I like Chargers getting points , can play both ends of Raiders /Tampa on a 7 or 10 pointer . I have Miami at pick w a 6pt Denver (won) teaser. I like the Giants on a winning end of a 13 pt teaser. I do a lot of mixed sports ML parlays and teasers. Eagles coming off a big win last week so they might not be too excited about Carolina +13 so adding points to that seems reasonable. Lions will probably win tonight . Good luck pal
Good stuff - I tease a lot myself and have been doing well this year. Can play both ends of one game as I did w Denver/Browns last week. I like Chargers getting points , can play both ends of Raiders /Tampa on a 7 or 10 pointer . I have Miami at pick w a 6pt Denver (won) teaser. I like the Giants on a winning end of a 13 pt teaser. I do a lot of mixed sports ML parlays and teasers. Eagles coming off a big win last week so they might not be too excited about Carolina +13 so adding points to that seems reasonable. Lions will probably win tonight . Good luck pal
Thx you too. It has been nice for a long time for me. I did not post my regression model plays for fear that the books
would adjust the juice which is exactly what happened. I liked it when the perception was that 2 team teasers were a bad investment.
Wong knew otherwise and the golden egg just got a little more expensive.
Thx you too. It has been nice for a long time for me. I did not post my regression model plays for fear that the books
would adjust the juice which is exactly what happened. I liked it when the perception was that 2 team teasers were a bad investment.
Wong knew otherwise and the golden egg just got a little more expensive.
SWEET!!
Since I am running ahead of the projected outcome, I am after all a gambler, so press using house money
Good Luck
SWEET!!
Since I am running ahead of the projected outcome, I am after all a gambler, so press using house money
Good Luck
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.