My play has been on Denver since they beat Pittsburgh and I loved that Carolina thumped the cardinals cuz I couldn't wait to hit Denver. But the absolute only thing scaring me is every bs article from ESPN and everywhere else keeps making you feel like Denver is the "sharp" side. From saying all money is on Carolina to billy Walters likely on Denver. Everything they can do to make Denver feel like the "sharp" play. That my friends scares the shit out of me
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
My play has been on Denver since they beat Pittsburgh and I loved that Carolina thumped the cardinals cuz I couldn't wait to hit Denver. But the absolute only thing scaring me is every bs article from ESPN and everywhere else keeps making you feel like Denver is the "sharp" side. From saying all money is on Carolina to billy Walters likely on Denver. Everything they can do to make Denver feel like the "sharp" play. That my friends scares the shit out of me
I hear ya, that's the scariest part about this game. way too much denver love.
BUT if you look at past history, ESPN is right about 50%(just guessing) of the time on the teams that they hype up, even if it's underdog they do fairly well
0
I hear ya, that's the scariest part about this game. way too much denver love.
BUT if you look at past history, ESPN is right about 50%(just guessing) of the time on the teams that they hype up, even if it's underdog they do fairly well
My play has been on Denver since they beat Pittsburgh and I loved that Carolina thumped the cardinals cuz I couldn't wait to hit Denver. But the absolute only thing scaring me is every bs article from ESPN and everywhere else keeps making you feel like Denver is the "sharp" side. From saying all money is on Carolina to billy Walters likely on Denver. Everything they can do to make Denver feel like the "sharp" play. That my friends scares the garbage out of me
billy walters doesnt advertise what he is betting. if espn saying he is on denver, they likely lying. if billy walters telling everyone he is on denver on espn, likely its because he is on carolina.
that guy dumps money first to cause movement and then once it starts moving he goes on the opposite side.
but billy walters doesnt tell people which side he is on unless he wants them to go on the side he is betting against.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cdog112:
My play has been on Denver since they beat Pittsburgh and I loved that Carolina thumped the cardinals cuz I couldn't wait to hit Denver. But the absolute only thing scaring me is every bs article from ESPN and everywhere else keeps making you feel like Denver is the "sharp" side. From saying all money is on Carolina to billy Walters likely on Denver. Everything they can do to make Denver feel like the "sharp" play. That my friends scares the garbage out of me
billy walters doesnt advertise what he is betting. if espn saying he is on denver, they likely lying. if billy walters telling everyone he is on denver on espn, likely its because he is on carolina.
that guy dumps money first to cause movement and then once it starts moving he goes on the opposite side.
but billy walters doesnt tell people which side he is on unless he wants them to go on the side he is betting against.
Yes i felt the winner of the pitt/denver game was going to the superbowl and would have a good chance of winning it. But I also thought seattle would represent the nfc. I don't buy into the consensus sites because again those are more techniques used to make one feel that they are on the "sharp" side. I'm aware billy walters doesn't post his plays but when espn is trying to imply that to get one to lean more on denver that worries me. . Good luck to all though
0
Yes i felt the winner of the pitt/denver game was going to the superbowl and would have a good chance of winning it. But I also thought seattle would represent the nfc. I don't buy into the consensus sites because again those are more techniques used to make one feel that they are on the "sharp" side. I'm aware billy walters doesn't post his plays but when espn is trying to imply that to get one to lean more on denver that worries me. . Good luck to all though
My play has been on Denver since they beat Pittsburgh and I loved that Carolina thumped the cardinals cuz I couldn't wait to hit Denver. But the absolute only thing scaring me is every bs article from ESPN and everywhere else keeps making you feel like Denver is the "sharp" side. From saying all money is on Carolina to billy Walters likely on Denver. Everything they can do to make Denver feel like the "sharp" play. That my friends scares the garbage out of me
This is more than likely a repeat of the late 80's superbowl massacres. I'm sorry, I don't see how Denver can complete against at 15-1 team that has just steam rolled everyone, while Denver has limped in the superbowl coming from a clearly inferior AFC conference this year. I cant pass up free money on this. 55-10 wouldn't be surprising circa 1989. And that's when Denver had a QB that wasn't in a wheehchair.
BOL All. Just be ready for the same result from 2 years ago.
This is a just total mismatch on every level.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cdog112:
My play has been on Denver since they beat Pittsburgh and I loved that Carolina thumped the cardinals cuz I couldn't wait to hit Denver. But the absolute only thing scaring me is every bs article from ESPN and everywhere else keeps making you feel like Denver is the "sharp" side. From saying all money is on Carolina to billy Walters likely on Denver. Everything they can do to make Denver feel like the "sharp" play. That my friends scares the garbage out of me
This is more than likely a repeat of the late 80's superbowl massacres. I'm sorry, I don't see how Denver can complete against at 15-1 team that has just steam rolled everyone, while Denver has limped in the superbowl coming from a clearly inferior AFC conference this year. I cant pass up free money on this. 55-10 wouldn't be surprising circa 1989. And that's when Denver had a QB that wasn't in a wheehchair.
BOL All. Just be ready for the same result from 2 years ago.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
