They're the defending champs, albeit not having a great season, playing a back-up QB, banged up line, ect. Public perception is the biggest factor in setting lines. Right now, the public's perception of Philly isn't great so if the line is that high it's probably accurate.
They're the defending champs, albeit not having a great season, playing a back-up QB, banged up line, ect. Public perception is the biggest factor in setting lines. Right now, the public's perception of Philly isn't great so if the line is that high it's probably accurate.
I think you're forgetting Carson Wentz and Napoleon Dynamite, I mean Nick Foles
I think you're forgetting Carson Wentz and Napoleon Dynamite, I mean Nick Foles
They're the defending champs, albeit not having a great season, playing a back-up QB, banged up line, ect. Public perception is the biggest factor in setting lines. Right now, the public's perception of Philly isn't great so if the line is that high it's probably accurate.
They're the defending champs, albeit not having a great season, playing a back-up QB, banged up line, ect. Public perception is the biggest factor in setting lines. Right now, the public's perception of Philly isn't great so if the line is that high it's probably accurate.
As per our 43rd President of the United States, George W. Bush said:
"There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. A fooled man can't get fooled again."
Eagles didn't cover last time? The Eagles will cover this time. Get'em while they're cheap at -6.
As per our 43rd President of the United States, George W. Bush said:
"There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. A fooled man can't get fooled again."
Eagles didn't cover last time? The Eagles will cover this time. Get'em while they're cheap at -6.
The line opened at -6.5 and has been 6 for the past week, so I have no idea on where you got 8 from.
The line opened at -6.5 and has been 6 for the past week, so I have no idea on where you got 8 from.
lol buying pts. square 101. colt should be playing junior college ball
lol buying pts. square 101. colt should be playing junior college ball
Bigjc. I would like to interject some rational thought on buying points as it puts the gambler at a horrible disadvantage when doing so. As it is typical that purchasing a half point will cost you an additional 10% of your wager (double that to an additional 20% for a total of 30% juice on or off the 3 or the 7), it puts the gambler in the situation where he will need to land on his "payout" or "push" numbers a highly unrealistic percentage of the time when compared to the true odds of the event.
Regardless of the vig boost, the expected value of your bet drops dramatically and is at the worst when buying on/off the 3 or 7. In the case of the 3 or 7, your "payout or push" number must land an absurd 30% or more on the number to show a profit. Most seasoned gamblers understand the implications of the math involved here but your statements above to EuroPro makes me think otherwise. The key word in your sentence ("seems"), makes me think you are not keeping track of how much money buying points has cost you in your lifetime (it's a lot).
If you want to maximize profits, find a book that will allow you to sell points back (5dimes). This lesson is now over. Good luck if you continue down your unprofitable path.
Bigjc. I would like to interject some rational thought on buying points as it puts the gambler at a horrible disadvantage when doing so. As it is typical that purchasing a half point will cost you an additional 10% of your wager (double that to an additional 20% for a total of 30% juice on or off the 3 or the 7), it puts the gambler in the situation where he will need to land on his "payout" or "push" numbers a highly unrealistic percentage of the time when compared to the true odds of the event.
Regardless of the vig boost, the expected value of your bet drops dramatically and is at the worst when buying on/off the 3 or 7. In the case of the 3 or 7, your "payout or push" number must land an absurd 30% or more on the number to show a profit. Most seasoned gamblers understand the implications of the math involved here but your statements above to EuroPro makes me think otherwise. The key word in your sentence ("seems"), makes me think you are not keeping track of how much money buying points has cost you in your lifetime (it's a lot).
If you want to maximize profits, find a book that will allow you to sell points back (5dimes). This lesson is now over. Good luck if you continue down your unprofitable path.
Bigjc. I would like to interject some rational thought on buying points as it puts the gambler at a horrible disadvantage when doing so. As it is typical that purchasing a half point will cost you an additional 10% of your wager (double that to an additional 20% for a total of 30% juice on or off the 3 or the 7), it puts the gambler in the situation where he will need to land on his "payout" or "push" numbers a highly unrealistic percentage of the time when compared to the true odds of the event.
Regardless of the vig boost, the expected value of your bet drops dramatically and is at the worst when buying on/off the 3 or 7. In the case of the 3 or 7, your "payout or push" number must land an absurd 30% or more on the number to show a profit. Most seasoned gamblers understand the implications of the math involved here but your statements above to EuroPro makes me think otherwise. The key word in your sentence ("seems"), makes me think you are not keeping track of how much money buying points has cost you in your lifetime (it's a lot).
If you want to maximize profits, find a book that will allow you to sell points back (5dimes). This lesson is now over. Good luck if you continue down your unprofitable path.
Bigjc. I would like to interject some rational thought on buying points as it puts the gambler at a horrible disadvantage when doing so. As it is typical that purchasing a half point will cost you an additional 10% of your wager (double that to an additional 20% for a total of 30% juice on or off the 3 or the 7), it puts the gambler in the situation where he will need to land on his "payout" or "push" numbers a highly unrealistic percentage of the time when compared to the true odds of the event.
Regardless of the vig boost, the expected value of your bet drops dramatically and is at the worst when buying on/off the 3 or 7. In the case of the 3 or 7, your "payout or push" number must land an absurd 30% or more on the number to show a profit. Most seasoned gamblers understand the implications of the math involved here but your statements above to EuroPro makes me think otherwise. The key word in your sentence ("seems"), makes me think you are not keeping track of how much money buying points has cost you in your lifetime (it's a lot).
If you want to maximize profits, find a book that will allow you to sell points back (5dimes). This lesson is now over. Good luck if you continue down your unprofitable path.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.