you are a moron, I was a bookie and took VIG just like Vegas and guess what? I lost big time three years in a row, because I can't control who win or loses, but Vegas can. You dumb behind. If you loses all the time where are you going to collect the juice from. You have to have 50-50 action all the time. I think you should go back to Elementry school and study your math.
if u knew what u were talking about u still be a bookie dumb behind but look inside the book not jus not the cover page like every real bookie know every amateur betters do when they pick
0
Quote Originally Posted by casinoroyal:
you are a moron, I was a bookie and took VIG just like Vegas and guess what? I lost big time three years in a row, because I can't control who win or loses, but Vegas can. You dumb behind. If you loses all the time where are you going to collect the juice from. You have to have 50-50 action all the time. I think you should go back to Elementry school and study your math.
if u knew what u were talking about u still be a bookie dumb behind but look inside the book not jus not the cover page like every real bookie know every amateur betters do when they pick
Most players that loses money become dead beats who don't pay up. Those people that has good credit always wins, because they figure out the system. Only "vegas" has total control. They have the final numbers and can control the outcome. That why so many local goes bust.
0
Most players that loses money become dead beats who don't pay up. Those people that has good credit always wins, because they figure out the system. Only "vegas" has total control. They have the final numbers and can control the outcome. That why so many local goes bust.
So going for it on 4th down twice in a drive up 28 is considered good sportsmanship?
Wait so doesnt that prove that it is NOT fixed? That means they were trying to score which would have sent it over. I don't get what you are saying here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bill702:
So going for it on 4th down twice in a drive up 28 is considered good sportsmanship?
Wait so doesnt that prove that it is NOT fixed? That means they were trying to score which would have sent it over. I don't get what you are saying here.
Wait so doesnt that prove that it is NOT fixed? That means they were trying to score which would have sent it over. I don't get what you are saying here.
I didn't say whether I thought it was fixed or not, but when you're trying to say it was the right call because of x,y,or z there has to be some logic to it. I'm arguing the logic not the premise.
Ultimately, I don't think it was fixed, but to say it was the right call due to "sportsmanship" is insane to me. However, I could believe the opposite that they went for the TD since Bennett took a hit that was uncalled for in a situation like this.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EastOakland:
Wait so doesnt that prove that it is NOT fixed? That means they were trying to score which would have sent it over. I don't get what you are saying here.
I didn't say whether I thought it was fixed or not, but when you're trying to say it was the right call because of x,y,or z there has to be some logic to it. I'm arguing the logic not the premise.
Ultimately, I don't think it was fixed, but to say it was the right call due to "sportsmanship" is insane to me. However, I could believe the opposite that they went for the TD since Bennett took a hit that was uncalled for in a situation like this.
Rember brother and sister this sports (Entertainment ) when u think games aren't fix other fix game this year is chargers at tampa bay the spread was + 3 1/2 chargers chargers are covering all game then Phillip rivers throws the ball too only Tampa players and they take it all the way for the score and guess what. Chargers didn't cover and if u think am a Moran please go back and watch the game and then see who's the Moron
0
Rember brother and sister this sports (Entertainment ) when u think games aren't fix other fix game this year is chargers at tampa bay the spread was + 3 1/2 chargers chargers are covering all game then Phillip rivers throws the ball too only Tampa players and they take it all the way for the score and guess what. Chargers didn't cover and if u think am a Moran please go back and watch the game and then see who's the Moron
you are a moron, I was a bookie and took VIG just like Vegas and guess what? I lost big time three years in a row, because I can't control who win or loses, but Vegas can. You dumb behind. If you loses all the time where are you going to collect the juice from. You have to have 50-50 action all the time. I think you should go back to Elementry school and study your math.
Same here. Years ago I was a college bookie hoping to make some "easy money". And yes some degenerates would go on unbelievable losing streaks. But eventually they won. With parlays and shy. I have no control over the outcome and couldn't use the money because on any give weekend they could win it all back on an unlikely parlay.
Even now that I started booking for the past year, been getting killed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by casinoroyal:
you are a moron, I was a bookie and took VIG just like Vegas and guess what? I lost big time three years in a row, because I can't control who win or loses, but Vegas can. You dumb behind. If you loses all the time where are you going to collect the juice from. You have to have 50-50 action all the time. I think you should go back to Elementry school and study your math.
Same here. Years ago I was a college bookie hoping to make some "easy money". And yes some degenerates would go on unbelievable losing streaks. But eventually they won. With parlays and shy. I have no control over the outcome and couldn't use the money because on any give weekend they could win it all back on an unlikely parlay.
Even now that I started booking for the past year, been getting killed.
A) Don't let 41 points get scored in the first half
B) Don't let the Giants get anywhere near scoring position on the last drive.
Was Coughlin in on this under fix? Then why was he throwing the ball late into the 4th quarter? IF he wasn't, then how could the fixers be sure he wouldn't kick the FG?
0
If you are going to fix an under, you
A) Don't let 41 points get scored in the first half
B) Don't let the Giants get anywhere near scoring position on the last drive.
Was Coughlin in on this under fix? Then why was he throwing the ball late into the 4th quarter? IF he wasn't, then how could the fixers be sure he wouldn't kick the FG?
You of all people shouldn't ask this question. Have you ever watch a movie or read ascript? All movies and plays have drama of height and decline. If this game was blowout early and hits the over, how are they going to have people watching the rest of this game? People are still watch thinking their over is going to hit and also the first half was a shoot out maybe they can play the over in the second half as well. this is all very simple to figure out. A vetern like you should know all about this. If you didn't pay attention before, the next time you will know, because this type of scenerio repeat itself over and over again.
0
Thorpe
You of all people shouldn't ask this question. Have you ever watch a movie or read ascript? All movies and plays have drama of height and decline. If this game was blowout early and hits the over, how are they going to have people watching the rest of this game? People are still watch thinking their over is going to hit and also the first half was a shoot out maybe they can play the over in the second half as well. this is all very simple to figure out. A vetern like you should know all about this. If you didn't pay attention before, the next time you will know, because this type of scenerio repeat itself over and over again.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.