All Forums | NFL Betting

WHY THE FUCK DID THEY PICK THAT FLAG UP?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2174
Posts: 49
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 253
Posted: #1
That is PI. NO QUESTION.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 1252
Posted: #2
pats getting fcked by nfl..
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 5290
Posted: #3
No, it wasn't PI.  Gronk had no play on the ball at all.  It was the right call.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 6667
Posted: #4
Both teams are AWARDED WITH FLAGS... ITS ENOUGH TO GET YOUR ATTENTION TO STAY SEATED FOR THE COMMERCIALS.. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 20966
Posted: #5
I was on Carolina....but i totally agree with you...UNbelievable!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 1351
Posted: #6
Spy gate
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 155365
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by dimndimn:

No, it wasn't PI.  Gronk had no play on the ball at all.  It was the right call.




What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion with a beeper!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 621
Posted: #8
Otherwise why throw it ref. doesn't make sense. Just stupid
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 60
Posted: #9
Intercepted underneath him. No chance at getting to the ball. The right call
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #10
supposedly "uncatchable" but how can he catch it if he's being interfered with
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 253
Posted: #11
Dimndimm you fucking moron. The whole RSON crew just said that is PI. It is facegaurding. It was a flag that THEY THREW and they picked it up. Pats just got absolutely fucking robbed.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 3992
Posted: #12
He had no play on the ball it was under thrown we are not in foxboro pats always get the calls in foxboro they don't get this one and they cry 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 241
Posted: #13

Gronk got mugged.  Bad call and I didn't have  a dime on it

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #14
ne got screwed.....


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 3185
Posted: #15
Vegas order
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 900
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:

supposedly "uncatchable" but how can he catch it if he's being interfered with


If the defender wasn't draped all over him, he could have made a play on the ball.  
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 10705
Posted: #17
IF not catchable ball then why not call a holding penalty? There was contact made 5 yards beyond the line of scrimmage. Defensive holding would have been the right call there
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #18

 

I hate NE and Brady, and had the 2nd half over....but how is that not a flag??? 20yds down the field and you bear hug a guy in the endzone.....thats legal???

People keep saying he had no play on it....thats because he was being held by a 265lbs linebacker

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 578
Posted: #19
spygate tuckrule a monday night game in middle of november. 2 for 3 is not bad.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by jmello1:



If the defender wasn't draped all over him, he could have made a play on the ball.  


yeah saw the replay New England got ROBBED Gronk would have had that ball if the defender wasn't draped all over him

so be it, happens, glad I just had NE 2nd h but feel bad for NE backers they had the right side +3
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by billyweather:

IF not catchable ball then why not call a holding penalty? There was contact made 5 yards beyond the line of scrimmage. Defensive holding would have been the right call there

not when the ball is in the air going to the receiver
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 9634
Posted: #22
The shady NFL... strikes again.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 19113
Posted: #23

To much money on New England.....BS...Dam ref's ...

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 10066
Posted: #24

Quote Originally Posted by dimndimn:

No, it wasn't PI.  Gronk had no play on the ball at all.  It was the right call.

Are you joking...You obviously as the Refs do not know the rules..

 1. Ball was in field of play 2. Gronk was primary receiver...

 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 15413
Posted: #25
he could have easily came back for that ball
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.