All Forums | NFL Betting

Wild Card weekend: All 4 DOGS!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3277
Posts: 37
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4542
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by tonyroman:

have simple system for all you doubters in this  years playoffs

Tebow w/ denv last year div round at Patriots as a 14 pt dog 

Texans yates relived injured starters last year div round away @ Ravens +7 1/2 points lost 20-13 

Big Ben of steelers never lost a game rookie year 2004 +3  vs Patriots lost 24-17 

Rook QB's 1st time in playoffs = 000000000000 and 14 s/u 2-12 ATS

pdub already made you look stupid on the Tebow winning vs the Steelers...

But allow me to make you out to be a moron... without looking into all your 'facts' ...here's 2 more that i know because i won on them

 - Big Ben won his 1st playoff game... Vs NE was the AFC     championship numbnuts

- you mentioned Daulton ...and Yates...said Yates lost and so did Daulton ...dude Texans WITH YATES beat Cinci

system?...what type of 'system' is bad facts?

time to go change your handle pal ... the one you have is just as stupid as you are... come back when you have something intelligent to say



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4542
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by tonyroman:



SAME FRIGGIN WILDCARD GAME--cinci vs tex

Daulton of Bengals last year made playoffs +4 @ texans got crushed 31-10  

Texans yates relived injured starters last year div round away @ Ravens +7 1/2 points lost 20-13 

Rook QB's 1st time in playoffs = 000000000000 and 14 s/u 2-12 ATS

bad facts (actually not facts) and bad #'s

please don't gamble son

 ..and please do not make very inaccurate posts because some people are as inept as you and just may believe you have over half a clue of what you are talking about...

i mean seriously?... uggg...what a terrible post 

man... i am never surprised by the new donkeys out of the woodwork on covers


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4542
Posted: #28
And I really wonder how your 'simple system' will play out in the SEA/WASH game...

riddle us that one...

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 606
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake:


That loss to the Bears was week 1. They had a 14-7 lead on the Pats with the ball until the wheels fell off. Pats had a punt return TD, and TWO pick 6's. Anytime that happens in a game you will win via blowout.

The question might be what have the Ravens proven to be a 6.5 fav over an 11-5 team. They have lost 4 of 5 and 2 of their last 3 home games. They also have 9-6 wins over KC, 13-10 vs pitt and 16-13 vs SD. (They also lost by 30 to the Texans in Houston, but conveniently you only point out the Colts losing by 12 in Houston)

Ravens getting Lewis back and semi healthy D is the only reason I'm not pounding the Colts, but Ravens aren't as good as last 2 years.

I didn't point out the Ravens losing by 30 in Houston because it wasn't relevant.  The Ravens aren't the road team here, the Colts are.  Further, the last game they lost, Taylor was the leading passer in that game, not Flacco.  I wonder why they lost?

The public seems to be pounding the Colts and likely get pounded.  I don't see how it makes sense to back the worst road team in the play-offs with a rookie QB and a below average defense.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 21
Posted: #30
Leaning on the dogs myself in a tease:

Cincy 10.5
Colts 12.5
Minn 15

1.65 to 1.       

     That Skins/Hawks game not sure, but I think I like the Hawks.  Texans D is beat up, Ravens and GB are laying too many points.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1032
Posted: #31
how can the colts be getting pounded? the line just move to +7
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 606
Posted: #32
LaHaterz,

Seems like the public is on indy.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1032
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by Numero_Uno:


What have you seen from Indy on the road to make you think they will cover?
You have a point, however, the colts are 7-2 to end the season, and the Ravens are 2-4 in the last 6, but if you think about it, San Diego game should have NOT happen, so in my eyes, the Ravens were 1-5. 
LOOK Lets face it, We Know Whats Hott and Whats NOT
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1032
Posted: #34
 Texans are allowing opposing quarterbacks a 96.7 passer rating over the past four games, including an awful 9:1 TD-to-INT ratio. Can Arrian Foster pick up the slack for Schaub? If you throw out last weeks game vs the Ravens, the Bengals defense hasn't given up 100 yards rushing on the ground since Week 11. The pass defense last allowed 300 yards passing in Week 2. The Houston offense has a tough task... BENGALS +4.5 ALL DAY
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 83
Posted: #35
Green Bay,Balti,   Houston been waiting on the playoffs all cover Sea Wash dead game somebody win or lose by 3 better taker th over  Whoop there it is
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1737
Posted: #36
Squares on dogs.

Always the same results.

Nice try Bungals.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 83
Posted: #37
Cinn lost Indi ,wash gets killed tommorrow
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.