Green Bay and Baltimore win blowouts. Lean to Houston to cover, Washington squeaks out win at home.
Sorry 65 Juice, but I take tremendous exception to the comment:
"Don't fool yourself, the Colts are a great team".
You must be referring to a version of a few years ago with a different QB at the helm. No way could you possibly be talking about the team in 2012 that finished:
*(-30) in PF/PA category ( TOTAL FRAUD)
* 25th in DVOA stats where the other 11 playoff bound teams are in the Top 15
*A QB who threw almost as many INT's as TD's
* they play in a cupcake division where you draw JAX/TEN 2X a year ea ( NOW LOOK AGAIN AT POINT # 1)
*WON 2 games alone on the merit of "CHUCKSTRONG" emotion
*had at least 4-5 4TH Q. comebacks because they coughed up those leads in the first place ( mostly against weak to middle of the pack teams)
No offence but I believe my points support that even to say they are a "GOOD" team would be a reach.
Sorry 65 Juice, but I take tremendous exception to the comment:
"Don't fool yourself, the Colts are a great team".
You must be referring to a version of a few years ago with a different QB at the helm. No way could you possibly be talking about the team in 2012 that finished:
*(-30) in PF/PA category ( TOTAL FRAUD)
* 25th in DVOA stats where the other 11 playoff bound teams are in the Top 15
*A QB who threw almost as many INT's as TD's
* they play in a cupcake division where you draw JAX/TEN 2X a year ea ( NOW LOOK AGAIN AT POINT # 1)
*WON 2 games alone on the merit of "CHUCKSTRONG" emotion
*had at least 4-5 4TH Q. comebacks because they coughed up those leads in the first place ( mostly against weak to middle of the pack teams)
No offence but I believe my points support that even to say they are a "GOOD" team would be a reach.
La Haterz,I totally disagree with you.
I have DEN going to the SB.
They played the toughest 1st H schedule in the league ( .783) and they were very competitive despite losses to ATL, NE and HOU. But you may recall they turned the ball over early in all of those games and fought back in every one. Againt NE a 3rd Q, fumble deep in NE's end was the turning point of that game.
This is Manning's 1st year with these receivers and if you have noticed they are much improved and much more on same page. Even though they had the softest 2nd H schedule (.342) they have ran the table and blew out most with 11 straight wins!
After the very 1st game of the season a (31-19 home win over PIT) I predicted they would be a Top 5 defense by end of season and they reached that in Week 13 and have held but very few talk about their "D". They are the only team in the league with a TOP 5 "O" and "D".
I feel that they would beat all 3 if they played right now and ATL in their own venue would be the toughest game for DEN. DEN has NE's # over the years and Manning knows what to expect. The beauty is he gets HFV this year if they survive though we know that could be wintry conditions-never his fave. But being on the Continental Divide the mildest of weather could also pervade on that date. He might get lucky.
I will run BAL's #'s and get back to you a bit later today.
Cheers...just my respectful .02
La Haterz,I totally disagree with you.
I have DEN going to the SB.
They played the toughest 1st H schedule in the league ( .783) and they were very competitive despite losses to ATL, NE and HOU. But you may recall they turned the ball over early in all of those games and fought back in every one. Againt NE a 3rd Q, fumble deep in NE's end was the turning point of that game.
This is Manning's 1st year with these receivers and if you have noticed they are much improved and much more on same page. Even though they had the softest 2nd H schedule (.342) they have ran the table and blew out most with 11 straight wins!
After the very 1st game of the season a (31-19 home win over PIT) I predicted they would be a Top 5 defense by end of season and they reached that in Week 13 and have held but very few talk about their "D". They are the only team in the league with a TOP 5 "O" and "D".
I feel that they would beat all 3 if they played right now and ATL in their own venue would be the toughest game for DEN. DEN has NE's # over the years and Manning knows what to expect. The beauty is he gets HFV this year if they survive though we know that could be wintry conditions-never his fave. But being on the Continental Divide the mildest of weather could also pervade on that date. He might get lucky.
I will run BAL's #'s and get back to you a bit later today.
Cheers...just my respectful .02
Sorry 65 Juice, but I take tremendous exception to the comment:
"Don't fool yourself, the Colts are a great team".
You must be referring to a version of a few years ago with a different QB at the helm. No way could you possibly be talking about the team in 2012 that finished:
*(-30) in PF/PA category ( TOTAL FRAUD)
* 25th in DVOA stats where the other 11 playoff bound teams are in the Top 15
*A QB who threw almost as many INT's as TD's
* they play in a cupcake division where you draw JAX/TEN 2X a year ea ( NOW LOOK AGAIN AT POINT # 1)
*WON 2 games alone on the merit of "CHUCKSTRONG" emotion
*had at least 4-5 4TH Q. comebacks because they coughed up those leads in the first place ( mostly against weak to middle of the pack teams)
No offence but I believe my points support that even to say they are a "GOOD" team would be a reach.
Sorry 65 Juice, but I take tremendous exception to the comment:
"Don't fool yourself, the Colts are a great team".
You must be referring to a version of a few years ago with a different QB at the helm. No way could you possibly be talking about the team in 2012 that finished:
*(-30) in PF/PA category ( TOTAL FRAUD)
* 25th in DVOA stats where the other 11 playoff bound teams are in the Top 15
*A QB who threw almost as many INT's as TD's
* they play in a cupcake division where you draw JAX/TEN 2X a year ea ( NOW LOOK AGAIN AT POINT # 1)
*WON 2 games alone on the merit of "CHUCKSTRONG" emotion
*had at least 4-5 4TH Q. comebacks because they coughed up those leads in the first place ( mostly against weak to middle of the pack teams)
No offence but I believe my points support that even to say they are a "GOOD" team would be a reach.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.