With regards to the Jets...
I totally agree with you man........Funny line. The Chargers will put up some points and force the Jets to score quick.........Might have to cancel my Jets wager before gametime.......Rivers looks unstoppable right now and has alot of weapons...........He loves throwing it down the field......I really hate him, crazy respect for him
I totally agree with you man........Funny line. The Chargers will put up some points and force the Jets to score quick.........Might have to cancel my Jets wager before gametime.......Rivers looks unstoppable right now and has alot of weapons...........He loves throwing it down the field......I really hate him, crazy respect for him
Everyone in the world including Vegas, smart betters, dumb betters, casual fans, etc... ALL know the the Jets have a great run game, a top defense and a "lockdown" corner in Revis. Despite all these facts the oddsmakers put a line of 9 out.
Everyone in the world including Vegas, smart betters, dumb betters, casual fans, etc... ALL know the the Jets have a great run game, a top defense and a "lockdown" corner in Revis. Despite all these facts the oddsmakers put a line of 9 out.
Yeah, but they also know everyone knows that the Jets have the number 1 running game and the number 1 pass defense. That said, why would they set such a high opening line when those rankings a lone should entice people to back the Jets. They could have opened this line at 6.5/7 and gotten a lot of Jet money.
Yeah, but they also know everyone knows that the Jets have the number 1 running game and the number 1 pass defense. That said, why would they set such a high opening line when those rankings a lone should entice people to back the Jets. They could have opened this line at 6.5/7 and gotten a lot of Jet money.
Yeah, but they also know everyone knows that the Jets have the number 1 running game and the number 1 pass defense. That said, why would they set such a high opening line when those rankings a lone should entice people to back the Jets. They could have opened this line at 6.5/7 and gotten a lot of Jet money.
Yeah, but they also know everyone knows that the Jets have the number 1 running game and the number 1 pass defense. That said, why would they set such a high opening line when those rankings a lone should entice people to back the Jets. They could have opened this line at 6.5/7 and gotten a lot of Jet money.
Still seems too high considering the publicity the Jets D has been getting (and rightfully so)....that would lead me to believe the public would assume they will slow down the high flying Chargers. But your right, they did underestimate the love NYJ is getting because they are a public dog and that opening line dropped to 7.5.
Still seems too high considering the publicity the Jets D has been getting (and rightfully so)....that would lead me to believe the public would assume they will slow down the high flying Chargers. But your right, they did underestimate the love NYJ is getting because they are a public dog and that opening line dropped to 7.5.
Everyone in the world including Vegas, smart betters, dumb betters, casual fans, etc... ALL know the the Jets have a great run game, a top defense and a "lockdown" corner in Revis. Despite all these facts the oddsmakers put a line of 9 out.
The line is set correctly, you make valid points but I don't believe its a bargain... I believe its ALOT of value... Same thing as last year when Arizona was a 10 or 11 point dog to Carolina... Jets are very dangerous. If they contain LT and Sproles, which they probably will, the Chargers become predictable and play into the Jets strength... Every body in the world knows the Jets are going to run run run, yet they still do it week in and week out b/c they also have the best OL in the NFL. The scary part is that Sanchez has been converting on the play action as well... This will be no cake walk for SD, I believe they play from behind the whole game, and I also believe they don't score more than 17 points. BOL, just my opinion
Everyone in the world including Vegas, smart betters, dumb betters, casual fans, etc... ALL know the the Jets have a great run game, a top defense and a "lockdown" corner in Revis. Despite all these facts the oddsmakers put a line of 9 out.
The line is set correctly, you make valid points but I don't believe its a bargain... I believe its ALOT of value... Same thing as last year when Arizona was a 10 or 11 point dog to Carolina... Jets are very dangerous. If they contain LT and Sproles, which they probably will, the Chargers become predictable and play into the Jets strength... Every body in the world knows the Jets are going to run run run, yet they still do it week in and week out b/c they also have the best OL in the NFL. The scary part is that Sanchez has been converting on the play action as well... This will be no cake walk for SD, I believe they play from behind the whole game, and I also believe they don't score more than 17 points. BOL, just my opinion
Yeah, but they also know everyone knows that the Jets have the number 1 running game and the number 1 pass defense. That said, why would they set such a high opening line when those rankings a lone should entice people to back the Jets. They could have opened this line at 6.5/7 and gotten a lot of Jet money.
because they feel that it will get half the money on jets and half on sd. do you not understand why they set lines
Yeah, but they also know everyone knows that the Jets have the number 1 running game and the number 1 pass defense. That said, why would they set such a high opening line when those rankings a lone should entice people to back the Jets. They could have opened this line at 6.5/7 and gotten a lot of Jet money.
because they feel that it will get half the money on jets and half on sd. do you not understand why they set lines
\
because they feel that it will get half the money on jets and half on sd. do you not understand why they set lines
Are you serious? Tell me something I don't know. My point is that this line could have opened at 7 and attracted equal action. Yet, opening it up at a high number like 9 smells fishy to me.
\
because they feel that it will get half the money on jets and half on sd. do you not understand why they set lines
Are you serious? Tell me something I don't know. My point is that this line could have opened at 7 and attracted equal action. Yet, opening it up at a high number like 9 smells fishy to me.
Are you serious? Tell me something I don't know. My point is that this line could have opened at 7 and attracted equal action. Yet, opening it up at a high number like 9 smells fishy to me.
you guys aren't making much of an effort to put yourself in the bookmakers' shoes...
San Diego is THE TEAM that everyone (i mean fucking everyone, without one exception) has fallen in love with to run the table and win the Super Bowl... the books KNOW this... they know this very well...
they had no choice but to put up an inflated line on this game... because they know there was a much greater chance that their liability would be exposed by heavy betting on the Chargers than there was of being exposed by heavy betting on the Jets...
seriously... put some thought into it... this line was put where it is, NOT because the books think that is the accurate line... but because that is where they thought they would get even action...
but they didn't... and they have quickly dropped that line down from 9 or 9.5 to 7... and it will continue to drop until they start getting the action on San Diego that they want...
Are you serious? Tell me something I don't know. My point is that this line could have opened at 7 and attracted equal action. Yet, opening it up at a high number like 9 smells fishy to me.
you guys aren't making much of an effort to put yourself in the bookmakers' shoes...
San Diego is THE TEAM that everyone (i mean fucking everyone, without one exception) has fallen in love with to run the table and win the Super Bowl... the books KNOW this... they know this very well...
they had no choice but to put up an inflated line on this game... because they know there was a much greater chance that their liability would be exposed by heavy betting on the Chargers than there was of being exposed by heavy betting on the Jets...
seriously... put some thought into it... this line was put where it is, NOT because the books think that is the accurate line... but because that is where they thought they would get even action...
but they didn't... and they have quickly dropped that line down from 9 or 9.5 to 7... and it will continue to drop until they start getting the action on San Diego that they want...
The Bengals were an emotionally drained team. I wouldn't read too much into this line movement, other than to realize the public is jumping on the points of what they perceive as a live doggy. I'm not buying it, the Chargers are playing great football and the Jets will find out what it is like to play a tough team for the first time in nearly a month.
BOL
The Bengals were an emotionally drained team. I wouldn't read too much into this line movement, other than to realize the public is jumping on the points of what they perceive as a live doggy. I'm not buying it, the Chargers are playing great football and the Jets will find out what it is like to play a tough team for the first time in nearly a month.
BOL
Ok wiseguy if you think that the oddsmakers set a line of 9 because they think that the Chargers will blow out the Jets heres something to factor in, when the Pittsburgh Steelers were making a playoff run with Ben in his rookie year they were 3 Point Faves at Cincy, 10 Point Dogs against Indianapolis in the Divisional round like the Jets.....and if i am correct did the Steelers not win that Game Outright, what was that Steelers team based upon....a Run Game, a Defense and a Rookie QB who had to manage the Game....does that ring a bell?
Just for the sake of accuracy, that was not Ben's rookie year. HIs rookie year, the Steelers went 15-1, barely beat the Jets in an OT playoff game, and got smoked by the Pats in the AFC Championship. The season to which you are referring was his second season.
I think that too many people are making the mistake of putting too much weight on the Jets win against Cincy and overlooking the teams recent play as a whole. Perhaps the books are begging for Jets action at +9 so they can clean house when the Chargers smoke them. Or perhaps their line is just off? We'll only know for certain who's right on Sunday night about 7 or 8pm.
An a related note, what's the difference between a trap line and a line that is just off? Seems to me that they both have the same telltale signs.
Ok wiseguy if you think that the oddsmakers set a line of 9 because they think that the Chargers will blow out the Jets heres something to factor in, when the Pittsburgh Steelers were making a playoff run with Ben in his rookie year they were 3 Point Faves at Cincy, 10 Point Dogs against Indianapolis in the Divisional round like the Jets.....and if i am correct did the Steelers not win that Game Outright, what was that Steelers team based upon....a Run Game, a Defense and a Rookie QB who had to manage the Game....does that ring a bell?
Just for the sake of accuracy, that was not Ben's rookie year. HIs rookie year, the Steelers went 15-1, barely beat the Jets in an OT playoff game, and got smoked by the Pats in the AFC Championship. The season to which you are referring was his second season.
I think that too many people are making the mistake of putting too much weight on the Jets win against Cincy and overlooking the teams recent play as a whole. Perhaps the books are begging for Jets action at +9 so they can clean house when the Chargers smoke them. Or perhaps their line is just off? We'll only know for certain who's right on Sunday night about 7 or 8pm.
An a related note, what's the difference between a trap line and a line that is just off? Seems to me that they both have the same telltale signs.
Just for the sake of accuracy, that was not Ben's rookie year. HIs rookie year, the Steelers went 15-1, barely beat the Jets in an OT playoff game, and got smoked by the Pats in the AFC Championship. The season to which you are referring was his second season.
I think that too many people are making the mistake of putting too much weight on the Jets win against Cincy and overlooking the teams recent play as a whole. Perhaps the books are begging for Jets action at +9 so they can clean house when the Chargers smoke them. Or perhaps their line is just off? We'll only know for certain who's right on Sunday night about 7 or 8pm.
An a related note, what's the difference between a trap line and a line that is just off? Seems to me that they both have the same telltale signs.
Just for the sake of accuracy, that was not Ben's rookie year. HIs rookie year, the Steelers went 15-1, barely beat the Jets in an OT playoff game, and got smoked by the Pats in the AFC Championship. The season to which you are referring was his second season.
I think that too many people are making the mistake of putting too much weight on the Jets win against Cincy and overlooking the teams recent play as a whole. Perhaps the books are begging for Jets action at +9 so they can clean house when the Chargers smoke them. Or perhaps their line is just off? We'll only know for certain who's right on Sunday night about 7 or 8pm.
An a related note, what's the difference between a trap line and a line that is just off? Seems to me that they both have the same telltale signs.
Hot Forum Topics
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,785
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 301,579
- PART DEUX 136
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 63,611
- SKINS/GIANTS live in game comments welcome 612
- Dallas Mavericks +6 2,515
- Thursday 11/12/2026 569
- Friday 11/13/2026 348
- Florida Man Thursday 3,908
- *EdgeHunter TNF Commanders VS Giants!* 2,640
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
