WTF Harbaugh????
i was hoping that he would make the FG, so we can go OT.
So did everyone else who had NE -7. I hate it when winners don't cover. Thanks NE
i was hoping that he would make the FG, so we can go OT.
So did everyone else who had NE -7. I hate it when winners don't cover. Thanks NE
Belicheck was smart enough not to call a timeout.
How as a coach can you be unaware that your kicker is not ready and that you should call a timeout. Was he trying to save it for otot? it?
Belicheck was smart enough not to call a timeout.
How as a coach can you be unaware that your kicker is not ready and that you should call a timeout. Was he trying to save it for otot? it?
New england backers were dead no matter what. If it went to ot they don't kick the extra point.
Not quite. In OT if the Pats had the ball first and kicked a field goal, then returned an interception for a TD on the ensuing Ravens drive then NE -7 would have covered. Incredibly unlikely, but still possible.
New england backers were dead no matter what. If it went to ot they don't kick the extra point.
Not quite. In OT if the Pats had the ball first and kicked a field goal, then returned an interception for a TD on the ensuing Ravens drive then NE -7 would have covered. Incredibly unlikely, but still possible.
So did everyone else who had NE -7. I hate it when winners don't cover. Thanks NE
So did everyone else who had NE -7. I hate it when winners don't cover. Thanks NE
DA BOYS, You're a dumbass! Please go read the NFL playoff overtime rules before ever posting again.
You may want to read them.
There is no way they could have won by 7.
![]()
DA BOYS, You're a dumbass! Please go read the NFL playoff overtime rules before ever posting again.
You may want to read them.
There is no way they could have won by 7.
![]()
You may want to read them.
There is no way they could have won by 7.
![]()
The Patriots could only have won by 3, 6 or 9 in OT. But they COULD have won by 9 in OT.
You may want to read them.
There is no way they could have won by 7.
![]()
The Patriots could only have won by 3, 6 or 9 in OT. But they COULD have won by 9 in OT.
Better yet, why didnt he try and run Rice up the middle on 3rd and one. Either get the 1st down with 15 seconds left for a couple plays in to the end zone, or at least center the ball ball for the fg try.....
was thinking this, too... he had a timeout... could have spiked it with time to run a play or 2 with his TO in hand, or call the timeout immediately and you would still have time to line up and spike the ball if you get sacked or tackled in bounds... getting the 1st down should have been a priority... never leave it in the hands of your kicker...
Better yet, why didnt he try and run Rice up the middle on 3rd and one. Either get the 1st down with 15 seconds left for a couple plays in to the end zone, or at least center the ball ball for the fg try.....
was thinking this, too... he had a timeout... could have spiked it with time to run a play or 2 with his TO in hand, or call the timeout immediately and you would still have time to line up and spike the ball if you get sacked or tackled in bounds... getting the 1st down should have been a priority... never leave it in the hands of your kicker...
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
