That's the exact same theory the books want you to believe...Arizona couldn't stop a 3rd string QB in Jones either...
Steelers defense isn't that good. Arizona walked up and down the field on them and then struggled in the red zone every single time. 469 yards of total offense against a "good" Steelers defense. Not buying it.
Both the Rams and Steelers losses were because Arizona beat themselves. Fumbling the opening kickoff and the Rams recovering at the 10 yard line and getting a TD off of that doesn't mean the team is bad. 24-22 is easily 22-17 and that wasn't even the only Cardinals turnover. 2 big plays by Landry Jones after Mike Vick basically lulled the Cardinals into sleep because he couldn't throw the ball to save his life and you get a Steelers win. Also, does anyone really believe that Mike Vick is better than Landry Jones? Sure he's listed as a "3rd string" QB but really Landry is the backup and Vick is the 3rd string.
If Carson Palmer doesn't give the game away, Cardinals win easy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:
That's the exact same theory the books want you to believe...Arizona couldn't stop a 3rd string QB in Jones either...
Steelers defense isn't that good. Arizona walked up and down the field on them and then struggled in the red zone every single time. 469 yards of total offense against a "good" Steelers defense. Not buying it.
Both the Rams and Steelers losses were because Arizona beat themselves. Fumbling the opening kickoff and the Rams recovering at the 10 yard line and getting a TD off of that doesn't mean the team is bad. 24-22 is easily 22-17 and that wasn't even the only Cardinals turnover. 2 big plays by Landry Jones after Mike Vick basically lulled the Cardinals into sleep because he couldn't throw the ball to save his life and you get a Steelers win. Also, does anyone really believe that Mike Vick is better than Landry Jones? Sure he's listed as a "3rd string" QB but really Landry is the backup and Vick is the 3rd string.
If Carson Palmer doesn't give the game away, Cardinals win easy.
Steelers defense isn't that good. Arizona walked up and down the field on them and then struggled in the red zone every single time. 469 yards of total offense against a "good" Steelers defense. Not buying it.
Both the Rams and Steelers losses were because Arizona beat themselves. Fumbling the opening kickoff and the Rams recovering at the 10 yard line and getting a TD off of that doesn't mean the team is bad. 24-22 is easily 22-17 and that wasn't even the only Cardinals turnover. 2 big plays by Landry Jones after Mike Vick basically lulled the Cardinals into sleep because he couldn't throw the ball to save his life and you get a Steelers win. Also, does anyone really believe that Mike Vick is better than Landry Jones? Sure he's listed as a "3rd string" QB but really Landry is the backup and Vick is the 3rd string.
If Carson Palmer doesn't give the game away, Cardinals win easy.
If you had to choose on this theory alone:
FLACCO vs PALMER
AND
HARBOUGH vs ARIANS
BALTY ALL DAY!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by UpperEchelon:
Steelers defense isn't that good. Arizona walked up and down the field on them and then struggled in the red zone every single time. 469 yards of total offense against a "good" Steelers defense. Not buying it.
Both the Rams and Steelers losses were because Arizona beat themselves. Fumbling the opening kickoff and the Rams recovering at the 10 yard line and getting a TD off of that doesn't mean the team is bad. 24-22 is easily 22-17 and that wasn't even the only Cardinals turnover. 2 big plays by Landry Jones after Mike Vick basically lulled the Cardinals into sleep because he couldn't throw the ball to save his life and you get a Steelers win. Also, does anyone really believe that Mike Vick is better than Landry Jones? Sure he's listed as a "3rd string" QB but really Landry is the backup and Vick is the 3rd string.
If Carson Palmer doesn't give the game away, Cardinals win easy.
I am pretty sure that Baltimore stayed out west after last weeks Niners game, therefore there was no back to back cross country travel. In fact, expect Baltimore to be better rested than you think....They had a week together as a team in the California sun, even battled a hurricane...
Wrong. They flew back home. They stayed out west earlier in the season and lost to Oakland I think, after that Harbaugh said they would fly home.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MacTaylor:
I am pretty sure that Baltimore stayed out west after last weeks Niners game, therefore there was no back to back cross country travel. In fact, expect Baltimore to be better rested than you think....They had a week together as a team in the California sun, even battled a hurricane...
Wrong. They flew back home. They stayed out west earlier in the season and lost to Oakland I think, after that Harbaugh said they would fly home.
Funny I recall reading a similar version of this post when you were pushing Georgia at home vs Bama. I think you bet Georgia at -2 LARGE, -1' LARGE, and Georgia even LARGE before the floor dropped out.
What you needed to bet was Georgia +28'
I appreciate your confident and enthusiastic nature but it seems like your insights are the typical coin flip
0
Funny I recall reading a similar version of this post when you were pushing Georgia at home vs Bama. I think you bet Georgia at -2 LARGE, -1' LARGE, and Georgia even LARGE before the floor dropped out.
What you needed to bet was Georgia +28'
I appreciate your confident and enthusiastic nature but it seems like your insights are the typical coin flip
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.