Have some time this morning so why not contribute. Vancouver management is HORRIBLE. It was reported that individual players went into Bruce's office after the game last night saying their good bye's. Promise you one thing, it is not the coach that is the problem with that organization. Man, I feel sorry for Patch. Honestly, his career might be over. My guess is they will have to use a graft on his second surgery and that is never a good thing for someone his age and athlete.
Onto today. Pens have won the last 4 meetings at the Rock. Funny, the last 5 meetings between these 2 teams, the visiting team has won. Devils returning home from a long Western road trip. In the Devils last 10 games, the game total has been 6 or greater. The only comment on the Boston game is the Sharks are 2-6 in b2b games this year. What really stands out is 5 of those 6 losses in the backend game has been a PL loss. Lastly, those tt players, Sharks have allowed 4 or more goals in 7 of their last 10 games, but that is one costly bet.
Guess the Hawks don't like Bedard. Winners of 3 straight and 6 of their last 7. In their last 6 games, they have scored 3 or more in all 6 games. On the flip side, the Kings have lost 3 in a row. Opponents have scored 3 or more in 6 of the last 7. Before you go look at the Hawks tt, these two have already met twice this year and both games ended 2-1. The question is who will be in net for the Kings?
Jets and Flyers are both on b2b and both playing 3rd game in 4 days. Jets are 4-3 in b2b games this year while the Flyers are 2-5. Sandstrom more than likely for the Flyers and he is 1-6-1 vs more than likely Rittich, who is 4-2 his last 6 starts. Lastly on this game, the last 10 meetings (now this goes back to 2016 so take it for what it is worth), the home team has won every meeting.
Finally, VGK vs Yotes at the Mullet. Here are some numbers 5, 4, 6, 1, 7. The number of goals by the Knights the last 5 meetings vs Yotes. Yotes have not scored a goal in 6 periods (2 games for those that can't count). Both on b2b so I didn't look that number up.
Enough from me, now fill in the blanks. What do you want to talk about?
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Good Morning Gentlemen and Jules
Have some time this morning so why not contribute. Vancouver management is HORRIBLE. It was reported that individual players went into Bruce's office after the game last night saying their good bye's. Promise you one thing, it is not the coach that is the problem with that organization. Man, I feel sorry for Patch. Honestly, his career might be over. My guess is they will have to use a graft on his second surgery and that is never a good thing for someone his age and athlete.
Onto today. Pens have won the last 4 meetings at the Rock. Funny, the last 5 meetings between these 2 teams, the visiting team has won. Devils returning home from a long Western road trip. In the Devils last 10 games, the game total has been 6 or greater. The only comment on the Boston game is the Sharks are 2-6 in b2b games this year. What really stands out is 5 of those 6 losses in the backend game has been a PL loss. Lastly, those tt players, Sharks have allowed 4 or more goals in 7 of their last 10 games, but that is one costly bet.
Guess the Hawks don't like Bedard. Winners of 3 straight and 6 of their last 7. In their last 6 games, they have scored 3 or more in all 6 games. On the flip side, the Kings have lost 3 in a row. Opponents have scored 3 or more in 6 of the last 7. Before you go look at the Hawks tt, these two have already met twice this year and both games ended 2-1. The question is who will be in net for the Kings?
Jets and Flyers are both on b2b and both playing 3rd game in 4 days. Jets are 4-3 in b2b games this year while the Flyers are 2-5. Sandstrom more than likely for the Flyers and he is 1-6-1 vs more than likely Rittich, who is 4-2 his last 6 starts. Lastly on this game, the last 10 meetings (now this goes back to 2016 so take it for what it is worth), the home team has won every meeting.
Finally, VGK vs Yotes at the Mullet. Here are some numbers 5, 4, 6, 1, 7. The number of goals by the Knights the last 5 meetings vs Yotes. Yotes have not scored a goal in 6 periods (2 games for those that can't count). Both on b2b so I didn't look that number up.
Enough from me, now fill in the blanks. What do you want to talk about?
See nothing that just awes me, but since I am a degenerate like all of you.
The only way Boston doesn't score 4 goals is if they DON'T won't to and give a "it's the Sharks and we just show up and should win" attitude. B's with rest, Sharks on b2b. Sharks have lost 7 of their last 10 and in all 7 losses, their opponents scored 4. Thought about the PL, but the tt is close to the same price, so ...
B's tt over 3.5 -155
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
0
See nothing that just awes me, but since I am a degenerate like all of you.
The only way Boston doesn't score 4 goals is if they DON'T won't to and give a "it's the Sharks and we just show up and should win" attitude. B's with rest, Sharks on b2b. Sharks have lost 7 of their last 10 and in all 7 losses, their opponents scored 4. Thought about the PL, but the tt is close to the same price, so ...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.