bud, You have some funny posts...but seriously...are you abot this continue smacking of the leafs? good ur makinmg dough but..
comon
bud, You have some funny posts...but seriously...are you abot this continue smacking of the leafs? good ur makinmg dough but..
comon
Nope..I'm riding the Leafs to Win and the Leafs on the PL..
Leafs may Stink but the Canes Suck bad .,.Ward was there only hope, with him out they are bad..
BOL.
Maybe Fax is working for the Books..
Nope..I'm riding the Leafs to Win and the Leafs on the PL..
Leafs may Stink but the Canes Suck bad .,.Ward was there only hope, with him out they are bad..
BOL.
Maybe Fax is working for the Books..
now that was funny....................dont be surprised if the leafs dip into your BR fax
now that was funny....................dont be surprised if the leafs dip into your BR fax
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
I'm sorry brothers....but that was funny and has more truth than most realize.
Kaberle 5 on 5 has like 60 points in last 320 games or so...not physical, doesn't block shots, isn't a leader, etc.
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
I'm sorry brothers....but that was funny and has more truth than most realize.
Kaberle 5 on 5 has like 60 points in last 320 games or so...not physical, doesn't block shots, isn't a leader, etc.
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
I'm sorry brothers....but that was funny and has more truth than most realize.
Kaberle 5 on 5 has like 60 points in last 320 games or so...not physical, doesn't block shots, isn't a leader, etc.
and hes done all that without any support + he missed 25+ games
last year
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
I'm sorry brothers....but that was funny and has more truth than most realize.
Kaberle 5 on 5 has like 60 points in last 320 games or so...not physical, doesn't block shots, isn't a leader, etc.
and hes done all that without any support + he missed 25+ games
last year
Dont get me Wrong the Leafs have some Bad Stats. But they are not hinder with the injury bug right now. The Leafs Road PP Is over 28 Pecent (2nd in NHL) and the PK at home for the Canes is 79 Percent (20th in NHl) |
Leafs on the road are getting about 32 shots per game (3rd in the NHL) the Canes are giving up about 28 per game at home (13 highest)
The Leafs PK is Bad Real Bad...But there PP makes up for it on the Road. Plus the PP of the canes is bad almost 14 percent.
Enough with STats.. Just ride the Better team . Road Favs are bad but in this case Way to easy.
BOL Fax. You have been killing it with the "fade the Leafs Things.
Dont get me Wrong the Leafs have some Bad Stats. But they are not hinder with the injury bug right now. The Leafs Road PP Is over 28 Pecent (2nd in NHL) and the PK at home for the Canes is 79 Percent (20th in NHl) |
Leafs on the road are getting about 32 shots per game (3rd in the NHL) the Canes are giving up about 28 per game at home (13 highest)
The Leafs PK is Bad Real Bad...But there PP makes up for it on the Road. Plus the PP of the canes is bad almost 14 percent.
Enough with STats.. Just ride the Better team . Road Favs are bad but in this case Way to easy.
BOL Fax. You have been killing it with the "fade the Leafs Things.
In general Johnny, he has never been an even strength elite level player...I'd say below average even.
He serves a purpose now because the NHL is a PP haven.
He's had a few injuries, but so have most players his age.
In general Johnny, he has never been an even strength elite level player...I'd say below average even.
He serves a purpose now because the NHL is a PP haven.
He's had a few injuries, but so have most players his age.
sry, but canes suck real bad..no stall or ward, if relyin on brindamore tonight...umm yea that speaks for it self :P
I took the leafs tonight, like i mentioned monster is in net and kessell has 4 goals in last 4 games?
sry, but canes suck real bad..no stall or ward, if relyin on brindamore tonight...umm yea that speaks for it self :P
I took the leafs tonight, like i mentioned monster is in net and kessell has 4 goals in last 4 games?
In general Johnny, he has never been an even strength elite level player...I'd say below average even.
He serves a purpose now because the NHL is a PP haven.
He's had a few injuries, but so have most players his age.
although I agree with you points..playing for an underachiving team
GP G A PTS
2002-03 | TORO | 82 | 11 | 36 | 47 | 30 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 119 | .092 |
2003-04 | TORO | 71 | 3 | 28 | 31 | 18 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 88 | .034 |
2005-06 | TORO | 82 | 9 | 58 | 67 | 46 | -1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 163 | .055 |
2006-07 | TORO | 74 | 11 | 47 | 58 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 128 | .086 |
2007-08 | TORO | 82 | 8 | 45 | 53 | 22 | -8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 155 | .052 |
2008-09 | TORO | 57 | 4 | 27 | 31 | 8 | -8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 93 | .043 |
2009-10 | TORO | 19 | 2 | 19 | 21 | 6 | -5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 34 | .059 |
In general Johnny, he has never been an even strength elite level player...I'd say below average even.
He serves a purpose now because the NHL is a PP haven.
He's had a few injuries, but so have most players his age.
although I agree with you points..playing for an underachiving team
GP G A PTS
2002-03 | TORO | 82 | 11 | 36 | 47 | 30 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 119 | .092 |
2003-04 | TORO | 71 | 3 | 28 | 31 | 18 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 88 | .034 |
2005-06 | TORO | 82 | 9 | 58 | 67 | 46 | -1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 163 | .055 |
2006-07 | TORO | 74 | 11 | 47 | 58 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 128 | .086 |
2007-08 | TORO | 82 | 8 | 45 | 53 | 22 | -8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 155 | .052 |
2008-09 | TORO | 57 | 4 | 27 | 31 | 8 | -8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 93 | .043 |
2009-10 | TORO | 19 | 2 | 19 | 21 | 6 | -5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 34 | .059 |
The Monster is an unproven rookie goaltender from the Swedish Elite League with a GAA above 3.0.
Yes, Kaberle's +/- suffers somewhat from playing for the Leafs. But Ian White managed to have a plus rating so it's not out of the question haha.
Honestly, if Kaberle was physical and had the intangibles i would agree he is a top tier D-man. But he doesn't do those things and he's aging quickly (31 now i think)
The Monster is an unproven rookie goaltender from the Swedish Elite League with a GAA above 3.0.
Yes, Kaberle's +/- suffers somewhat from playing for the Leafs. But Ian White managed to have a plus rating so it's not out of the question haha.
Honestly, if Kaberle was physical and had the intangibles i would agree he is a top tier D-man. But he doesn't do those things and he's aging quickly (31 now i think)
I totally agree...he is weak on the puck and doesnt play physical
Although if he were to be on a team like SJ/Philly/Det...those numbers would be through the roof..65+pts
also he wouldnt be leaned on heavily to carry that team and the talk of him beinmg soft would be a non issue
I totally agree...he is weak on the puck and doesnt play physical
Although if he were to be on a team like SJ/Philly/Det...those numbers would be through the roof..65+pts
also he wouldnt be leaned on heavily to carry that team and the talk of him beinmg soft would be a non issue
So taking a team thats lost 14 in a row is a good play. I should parlay this with the Lions and the Browns.
Riding the canes streak now that would have been profitable.
So taking a team thats lost 14 in a row is a good play. I should parlay this with the Lions and the Browns.
Riding the canes streak now that would have been profitable.
I bet the Canes ML, and whatever bet somebody makes on this game, don't sit back and watch the game, it'l be terribly lame and slow.....
Anyhow, if you do watch it, then this one on me!
GL!
I bet the Canes ML, and whatever bet somebody makes on this game, don't sit back and watch the game, it'l be terribly lame and slow.....
Anyhow, if you do watch it, then this one on me!
GL!
now that was funny....................dont be surprised if the leafs dip into your BR fax
3-0 buds period 1.....
now that was funny....................dont be surprised if the leafs dip into your BR fax
3-0 buds period 1.....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.