What's up guys? If you guys have been on covers long enough you know how the "reverse" threads work? If you haven't tried it, try it, because it 100% works. Thank you Panthers, I cashed in heavily last night on my series wager and game wager. Good luck guys
This weak man, even for you
1
Quote Originally Posted by TxRangers:
What's up guys? If you guys have been on covers long enough you know how the "reverse" threads work? If you haven't tried it, try it, because it 100% works. Thank you Panthers, I cashed in heavily last night on my series wager and game wager. Good luck guys
Ya'll guys must have not been on covers for very long. For those who have? Y'all know exactly what I'm talking about with the ole "reverse thread". It never fails! As soon as someone says they have a "100%" winner. You should 100% take the opposite. That's just how it works on covers! That's just how reverse threads works on covers. You guys know exactly what I'm talking about! You read them, you've seen them. For those who don't believe it, or me. Try for yourself. And you'll be happy that you did.
0
Ya'll guys must have not been on covers for very long. For those who have? Y'all know exactly what I'm talking about with the ole "reverse thread". It never fails! As soon as someone says they have a "100%" winner. You should 100% take the opposite. That's just how it works on covers! That's just how reverse threads works on covers. You guys know exactly what I'm talking about! You read them, you've seen them. For those who don't believe it, or me. Try for yourself. And you'll be happy that you did.
@rustie wait, was that a "reverse thread" post rustie...???
yes it was, because reverse threads work 100% of the time. If you don't believe me, try it yourself. They work. And if you have been on covers long enough, you would know exactly what I'm talking about. Why do you think I called it a 100% winner, because I needed to win my bet, AND I DID. C'mon guys, you've seen 100% winner threads. Take the opposite, always. You guys are a bunch of rookies.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dyamarik:
@rustie wait, was that a "reverse thread" post rustie...???
yes it was, because reverse threads work 100% of the time. If you don't believe me, try it yourself. They work. And if you have been on covers long enough, you would know exactly what I'm talking about. Why do you think I called it a 100% winner, because I needed to win my bet, AND I DID. C'mon guys, you've seen 100% winner threads. Take the opposite, always. You guys are a bunch of rookies.
The next time I have a large wager, which will be soon, I will make another 100% winner thread, and whichever team I say I have, take the opposite. It's that simple. You guys are a bunch of rookies. Do the research on covers 100% threads.
0
The next time I have a large wager, which will be soon, I will make another 100% winner thread, and whichever team I say I have, take the opposite. It's that simple. You guys are a bunch of rookies. Do the research on covers 100% threads.
But hey, at least Mike Trout didn't strike out during the game last night. But believe me, if he was playing last night, he would have struck out at least once, maybe twice. Lol. And Willie Mays and Frank Thomas are laughing their asses off at how many strikeouts Trout has. Frank Thomas is saying to himself. "Wait a minute, I'm a home run hitter, I have a career batting average of over 300, I have over 500 home runs, I played 22 years, and faced HOF pitchers on a weekly basis, and Trout has more strikeouts then I did right now in his career just in 13 years".
0
But hey, at least Mike Trout didn't strike out during the game last night. But believe me, if he was playing last night, he would have struck out at least once, maybe twice. Lol. And Willie Mays and Frank Thomas are laughing their asses off at how many strikeouts Trout has. Frank Thomas is saying to himself. "Wait a minute, I'm a home run hitter, I have a career batting average of over 300, I have over 500 home runs, I played 22 years, and faced HOF pitchers on a weekly basis, and Trout has more strikeouts then I did right now in his career just in 13 years".
And if Hank Aaron were alive, he died by taking the vaccine, but it is what it is, he would say the same thing as Frank Thomas did. Look at my stats, 3771 hits, 1367 k's 755 hr's against Tom seaver, Ryan and numerous HOF pitchers. But oh well. And yet the media and some people think Mike Trout is better than Hank Aaron. Despicable. Trout won't have any numbers close to hammering Hank. Trout will have 3K strikeouts and nowhere near 3K hits when his career ends. Anyways, good luck guys. And when you see a 100% thread winner, take the opposite. You guys are a bunch of rookies
0
And if Hank Aaron were alive, he died by taking the vaccine, but it is what it is, he would say the same thing as Frank Thomas did. Look at my stats, 3771 hits, 1367 k's 755 hr's against Tom seaver, Ryan and numerous HOF pitchers. But oh well. And yet the media and some people think Mike Trout is better than Hank Aaron. Despicable. Trout won't have any numbers close to hammering Hank. Trout will have 3K strikeouts and nowhere near 3K hits when his career ends. Anyways, good luck guys. And when you see a 100% thread winner, take the opposite. You guys are a bunch of rookies
Hank Aaron's death was from natural cause not a COVID -19 vaccine You really seem to have trouble telling the truth here You posted to "mark my words" the Panthers were not winning, they won Now this garbage about Hank Aaron The reverse babbling shit is just that shit You lost and lost big
0
Hank Aaron's death was from natural cause not a COVID -19 vaccine You really seem to have trouble telling the truth here You posted to "mark my words" the Panthers were not winning, they won Now this garbage about Hank Aaron The reverse babbling shit is just that shit You lost and lost big
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.