I've been using last 10 games team statistics and individual goalie statistics to project game by game so far this season. Betting mostly on Underdogs, Short Favorites and Unders, I've compiled a 46-34 (57.5%) record, for a profit of 12.83 units, flat-betting one unit per play. I'm going to start posting my individual game projections here and see how they continue to do. I have a Google sheet as well documenting my picks. I realize that the small sample means little to nothing, and I'm not touting this as a foolproof thing, just going to track the picks here.
Tampa Bay Lightning @ Philadelphia Flyers
Vasilevskiy vs Mason: TB 2.95 PHI 1.88
Since I won't have the whole slate finished before this game starts, I'll post it first. Home ice is accounted for in the projection. Tampa Bay +109 @ Philadelphia is definitely a play for me today. Will post the rest of the slate when I have it done. Good Luck.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I've been using last 10 games team statistics and individual goalie statistics to project game by game so far this season. Betting mostly on Underdogs, Short Favorites and Unders, I've compiled a 46-34 (57.5%) record, for a profit of 12.83 units, flat-betting one unit per play. I'm going to start posting my individual game projections here and see how they continue to do. I have a Google sheet as well documenting my picks. I realize that the small sample means little to nothing, and I'm not touting this as a foolproof thing, just going to track the picks here.
Tampa Bay Lightning @ Philadelphia Flyers
Vasilevskiy vs Mason: TB 2.95 PHI 1.88
Since I won't have the whole slate finished before this game starts, I'll post it first. Home ice is accounted for in the projection. Tampa Bay +109 @ Philadelphia is definitely a play for me today. Will post the rest of the slate when I have it done. Good Luck.
Pittsburgh Penguins -166 @ Buffalo Sabres +150 (5, Ov -131 / Un +119)
Fleury vs Nilsson: PIT 1.89 BUF 1.77
No play for me. There may be some line value on Buffalo, but I only back teams that I project to actually win the game. Too many goals for an Under 5 play as well. Pass.
0
Pittsburgh Penguins -166 @ Buffalo Sabres +150 (5, Ov -131 / Un +119)
Fleury vs Nilsson: PIT 1.89 BUF 1.77
No play for me. There may be some line value on Buffalo, but I only back teams that I project to actually win the game. Too many goals for an Under 5 play as well. Pass.
Columbus Blue Jackets +172 @ Washington Capitals -191 (5, Ov -128 / Un +116)
Bobrovsky vs Holtby: CBJ 2.15 WSH 2.15
McElhinney vs Holtby: OFF
McElhinney vs Grubauer: OFF
Bobrovsky vs Grubauer: CBJ 2.55 WSH 2.15
I like the Blue Jackets as long as the line stays up above +160 or so once the goalies are confirmed, and as long as Bobrovsky is in net. I don’t have a projection for McElhinney because I only use stats for goalies with at least 100 minutes.
0
11/20
Columbus Blue Jackets +172 @ Washington Capitals -191 (5, Ov -128 / Un +116)
Bobrovsky vs Holtby: CBJ 2.15 WSH 2.15
McElhinney vs Holtby: OFF
McElhinney vs Grubauer: OFF
Bobrovsky vs Grubauer: CBJ 2.55 WSH 2.15
I like the Blue Jackets as long as the line stays up above +160 or so once the goalies are confirmed, and as long as Bobrovsky is in net. I don’t have a projection for McElhinney because I only use stats for goalies with at least 100 minutes.
Calgary Flames +129 @ Detroit Red Wings -143 (5, Ov -129 / Un +117)
Johnson vs Mrazek: CAL 1.23 DET 1.21
Elliott vs Mrazek: CAL 1.23 DET 2.01
Elliott vs Howard: CAL 0.04 DET 2.01
Johnson vs Howard: CAL 0.04 DET 1.21
If Howard is in net I like the Under 5 +117. And although I project a Flames victory in a Johnson vs Mrazek matchup, there’s not enough of an edge to justify playing only +129. If that line were to go up then I could get behind that play.
0
Calgary Flames +129 @ Detroit Red Wings -143 (5, Ov -129 / Un +117)
Johnson vs Mrazek: CAL 1.23 DET 1.21
Elliott vs Mrazek: CAL 1.23 DET 2.01
Elliott vs Howard: CAL 0.04 DET 2.01
Johnson vs Howard: CAL 0.04 DET 1.21
If Howard is in net I like the Under 5 +117. And although I project a Flames victory in a Johnson vs Mrazek matchup, there’s not enough of an edge to justify playing only +129. If that line were to go up then I could get behind that play.
Los Angeles Kings +133 @ Anaheim Ducks -147 (5, Ov -110 / Un +100)
Budaj vs Gibson: LOS 2.54 ANA 1.56
Zatkoff vs Gibson: LOS 2.54 ANA 3.56
Zatkoff vs Bernier: LOS 2.06 ANA 3.56
Budaj vs Bernier: LOS 2.06 ANA 1.56
If Budaj is in net I like the Kings +133. If it happens to be Zatkoff vs Gibson then I’d be on the Over 5 -110, as long as it stays at 5 with small juice.
0
Los Angeles Kings +133 @ Anaheim Ducks -147 (5, Ov -110 / Un +100)
Budaj vs Gibson: LOS 2.54 ANA 1.56
Zatkoff vs Gibson: LOS 2.54 ANA 3.56
Zatkoff vs Bernier: LOS 2.06 ANA 3.56
Budaj vs Bernier: LOS 2.06 ANA 1.56
If Budaj is in net I like the Kings +133. If it happens to be Zatkoff vs Gibson then I’d be on the Over 5 -110, as long as it stays at 5 with small juice.
Yesterday was 2-1-2 for a profit of 1.60 Units. These projections have been at their best this year when backing Underdogs of +115 or greater. In 19 games they are 14-5 for a profit of 13.57 Units. They are also 15-7-2 when playing Under the total for 6.77 Units. Hopefully we can cash some more tickets today. GL
0
Yesterday was 2-1-2 for a profit of 1.60 Units. These projections have been at their best this year when backing Underdogs of +115 or greater. In 19 games they are 14-5 for a profit of 13.57 Units. They are also 15-7-2 when playing Under the total for 6.77 Units. Hopefully we can cash some more tickets today. GL
Chicago Blackhawks +107 @ Edmonton Oilers -118 (5.5, Ov +125 / Un -138)
Crawford vs Talbot: CHI 1.84 EDM 1.38
I’ll play the Blackhawks +107 as road dogs. Not a fan of the combination of the juice on the Under 5.5 with the number of goals projected, so I’ll pass on the total.
0
Chicago Blackhawks +107 @ Edmonton Oilers -118 (5.5, Ov +125 / Un -138)
Crawford vs Talbot: CHI 1.84 EDM 1.38
I’ll play the Blackhawks +107 as road dogs. Not a fan of the combination of the juice on the Under 5.5 with the number of goals projected, so I’ll pass on the total.
New Jersey Devils +208 @ San Jose Sharks -233 (5, Ov +110 / Un -121)
Kinkaid vs Jones: NJ 2.00 SJ -0.02
My numbers point to Kinkaid and the big underdog Devils shutting down the Sharks. I’ll test those numbers and make New Jersey +208 the third play of the night.
0
New Jersey Devils +208 @ San Jose Sharks -233 (5, Ov +110 / Un -121)
Kinkaid vs Jones: NJ 2.00 SJ -0.02
My numbers point to Kinkaid and the big underdog Devils shutting down the Sharks. I’ll test those numbers and make New Jersey +208 the third play of the night.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.