Great series thus far and hats off to Ottawa for pushing this to a Game 7. They have outplayed the # 1 seed to this point. That being said, Lundqvist (and the Rangers) is off back to back home losses, so situationally I expect a stone wall in net for the home team. This season at home, following a home loss, Lunqvist is 9-2 in regulation yielding on average 1.45 goals per game and holding a 0.941 save percentage. Ludqvist at home following two home losses is 3-0 with a 1.33 goals against average and holding a 0.950 save percentage. Pretty sick numbers for the Rangers goalie. On the other side, things situationally don't look as good for Craig Anderson. He comes in off a shutout in his last road appearance. Since 2008, on the road, following a road shutout, Anderson is 4-4 yielding a 3.12 goals against average and holding a 0.908 save percentage. This is a best of 1, so history is tough to rely upon, but there is a huge discrepancy in goalie performance from both an actual and situational perspective, and I think that will be evident tonight.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Playoffs : 3-1-2 +12.13 units
New York Rangers -147 (15 units to win 10.20)
New York Rangers PL +190 (5 units to win 9.50)
Great series thus far and hats off to Ottawa for pushing this to a Game 7. They have outplayed the # 1 seed to this point. That being said, Lundqvist (and the Rangers) is off back to back home losses, so situationally I expect a stone wall in net for the home team. This season at home, following a home loss, Lunqvist is 9-2 in regulation yielding on average 1.45 goals per game and holding a 0.941 save percentage. Ludqvist at home following two home losses is 3-0 with a 1.33 goals against average and holding a 0.950 save percentage. Pretty sick numbers for the Rangers goalie. On the other side, things situationally don't look as good for Craig Anderson. He comes in off a shutout in his last road appearance. Since 2008, on the road, following a road shutout, Anderson is 4-4 yielding a 3.12 goals against average and holding a 0.908 save percentage. This is a best of 1, so history is tough to rely upon, but there is a huge discrepancy in goalie performance from both an actual and situational perspective, and I think that will be evident tonight.
i see they finally suckered you into laying juice on a completely even game.
Actually with his two wagers combined he is essentially only risking the same as his reward. Twenty units for twenty units. A variance of a -1 puckline play.
Obviously the man does not see it as a completely even game. We all have our own view of things. Your statement is just your opinion.
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Malamadre:
i see they finally suckered you into laying juice on a completely even game.
Actually with his two wagers combined he is essentially only risking the same as his reward. Twenty units for twenty units. A variance of a -1 puckline play.
Obviously the man does not see it as a completely even game. We all have our own view of things. Your statement is just your opinion.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.