I got sucked into the Blues last week at +180 but as mentioned above they forgot to show up for that game. Nice revenge spot here and that Leafs D is definitely a scary one.
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
0
I got sucked into the Blues last week at +180 but as mentioned above they forgot to show up for that game. Nice revenge spot here and that Leafs D is definitely a scary one.
@thehuntman I don't care who the 3rd pairing is it can't be worse then when gio is on it. Tough game to call, the Leafs don't play many 1pm games.
Between the two you have a combined 3 games of experience? Personally I would rather have Gio in there. Rifai a free agent out of Harvard making his NHL debut.
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
0
Quote Originally Posted by leafs1789:
@thehuntman I don't care who the 3rd pairing is it can't be worse then when gio is on it. Tough game to call, the Leafs don't play many 1pm games.
Between the two you have a combined 3 games of experience? Personally I would rather have Gio in there. Rifai a free agent out of Harvard making his NHL debut.
I just found a Blues TT at 2.5 -135 had to jump on it. Also found a total of 5.5 over -150 so took that as well. I have 5 different books so obviously always looking for the best value out there.
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
0
I just found a Blues TT at 2.5 -135 had to jump on it. Also found a total of 5.5 over -150 so took that as well. I have 5 different books so obviously always looking for the best value out there.
@thehuntman Having both gio and brodie in the line up is like watching someone play ice hockey on Nintendo with the fat dudes, very slow.
I agree with you but having a D pair put together with 3 games of experience in the NHL and on the road can't be good either. None of the other 4 should be playing over 20 minutes a game neither but some will probably hit 25.
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
0
Quote Originally Posted by leafs1789:
@thehuntman Having both gio and brodie in the line up is like watching someone play ice hockey on Nintendo with the fat dudes, very slow.
I agree with you but having a D pair put together with 3 games of experience in the NHL and on the road can't be good either. None of the other 4 should be playing over 20 minutes a game neither but some will probably hit 25.
I just know with this bad d and last seasons bad d the leafs are something like 17-2-1 without Reilly, for some reason the whole team plays better team d when Reilly is out.
0
@thehuntman
I just know with this bad d and last seasons bad d the leafs are something like 17-2-1 without Reilly, for some reason the whole team plays better team d when Reilly is out.
@thehuntman I just know with this bad d and last seasons bad d the leafs are something like 17-2-1 without Reilly, for some reason the whole team plays better team d when Reilly is out.
What a crazy stat that is, it makes no sense but that's what you get with this team lol. I probably have this game capped completely wrong and Leafs will win 3-0 lol. I will be happy for that but it will hurt me account wise.
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
0
Quote Originally Posted by leafs1789:
@thehuntman I just know with this bad d and last seasons bad d the leafs are something like 17-2-1 without Reilly, for some reason the whole team plays better team d when Reilly is out.
What a crazy stat that is, it makes no sense but that's what you get with this team lol. I probably have this game capped completely wrong and Leafs will win 3-0 lol. I will be happy for that but it will hurt me account wise.
I just found a Blues TT at 2.5 -135 had to jump on it. Also found a total of 5.5 over -150 so took that as well. I have 5 different books so obviously always looking for the best value out there.
Blues TT over 2.5 up to as high as -180 now. A couple of my books were way behind on knowing the state of the D. It could still be a loser but I will take my chances.
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thehuntman:
I just found a Blues TT at 2.5 -135 had to jump on it. Also found a total of 5.5 over -150 so took that as well. I have 5 different books so obviously always looking for the best value out there.
Blues TT over 2.5 up to as high as -180 now. A couple of my books were way behind on knowing the state of the D. It could still be a loser but I will take my chances.
Being a die hard leafs fan, I can't bet for or against them, only time I will bet them is if they are down 2 after the first period. I'm the same way with the bills Jays and raptors. If I was betting this game I'd probably go with a regulation tie +335.
0
@thehuntman
Being a die hard leafs fan, I can't bet for or against them, only time I will bet them is if they are down 2 after the first period. I'm the same way with the bills Jays and raptors. If I was betting this game I'd probably go with a regulation tie +335.
Quote Originally Posted by thehuntman: I just found a Blues TT at 2.5 -135 had to jump on it. Also found a total of 5.5 over -150 so took that as well. I have 5 different books so obviously always looking for the best value out there. Blues TT over 2.5 up to as high as -180 now. A couple of my books were way behind on knowing the state of the D. It could still be a loser but I will take my chances.
I got that at considerably lower number I’m sure.m earlier.
blues horny today?
0
Quote Originally Posted by thehuntman:
Quote Originally Posted by thehuntman: I just found a Blues TT at 2.5 -135 had to jump on it. Also found a total of 5.5 over -150 so took that as well. I have 5 different books so obviously always looking for the best value out there. Blues TT over 2.5 up to as high as -180 now. A couple of my books were way behind on knowing the state of the D. It could still be a loser but I will take my chances.
I got that at considerably lower number I’m sure.m earlier.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.