Going to wait until the goalies are confirmed but if Price is net this will be at least a 3 UNIT play for me. If you have watched the Ducks this season you will know that they have been awful defensivly. There are trade rumors all around the team and there is talk that the team has given up on Randy Carlyle as coach and he could be easily fired after this game. Markov is expected back and this team knows that the Ducks have packed it in.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
LEANS
HABS -110
Going to wait until the goalies are confirmed but if Price is net this will be at least a 3 UNIT play for me. If you have watched the Ducks this season you will know that they have been awful defensivly. There are trade rumors all around the team and there is talk that the team has given up on Randy Carlyle as coach and he could be easily fired after this game. Markov is expected back and this team knows that the Ducks have packed it in.
love it man. ill be on it with you big as well. good luck to us. at first glance for tomorrow i liked the over 5.5 at even money in boston and toronto. what do you think?
0
love it man. ill be on it with you big as well. good luck to us. at first glance for tomorrow i liked the over 5.5 at even money in boston and toronto. what do you think?
love it man. ill be on it with you big as well. good luck to us. at first glance for tomorrow i liked the over 5.5 at even money in boston and toronto. what do you think?
At first glance I like the OVER too, I'd wait on goalies before looking anything in.
0
Quote Originally Posted by triplee2385:
love it man. ill be on it with you big as well. good luck to us. at first glance for tomorrow i liked the over 5.5 at even money in boston and toronto. what do you think?
At first glance I like the OVER too, I'd wait on goalies before looking anything in.
Yeah, I'm hoping Price gets the start. Considering the Habs haven't played since Saturday, and the way that game ended against the Pens, I think Price will get the start, and he will be plenty pissed.
0
Yeah, I'm hoping Price gets the start. Considering the Habs haven't played since Saturday, and the way that game ended against the Pens, I think Price will get the start, and he will be plenty pissed.
I was looking at that play too but the Habs are only 4 wins better than Anahiem and the Ducks have been facing quality opponents the last 2 weeks and most of those games were close, they can beat the Habs.
0
I was looking at that play too but the Habs are only 4 wins better than Anahiem and the Ducks have been facing quality opponents the last 2 weeks and most of those games were close, they can beat the Habs.
Habs 4 wins better than the ducks? The ducks have only won 6 times in first 23 games and are 1-8-1 in last 10. Can't believe the odds makers on this one? Go Habs Go.
0
Habs 4 wins better than the ducks? The ducks have only won 6 times in first 23 games and are 1-8-1 in last 10. Can't believe the odds makers on this one? Go Habs Go.
tailed your 5 unit play last and you crushed it. Noticed however, you only list that you are up 3.64 units for 5 unit plays... when you place you wagers and it is minus money, for instance vancouver at -138, do you only wager 5 units flat or do you wager to win 5 units (6.9 units wagered in this scenario). i was under the impression that it was common practice when it is plus money that you wager 5 units and when it is minus money you wager to win 5 units.. thanks man and keep it up
0
xbaggy got a quick question for you....
tailed your 5 unit play last and you crushed it. Noticed however, you only list that you are up 3.64 units for 5 unit plays... when you place you wagers and it is minus money, for instance vancouver at -138, do you only wager 5 units flat or do you wager to win 5 units (6.9 units wagered in this scenario). i was under the impression that it was common practice when it is plus money that you wager 5 units and when it is minus money you wager to win 5 units.. thanks man and keep it up
tailed your 5 unit play last and you crushed it. Noticed however, you only list that you are up 3.64 units for 5 unit plays... when you place you wagers and it is minus money, for instance vancouver at -138, do you only wager 5 units flat or do you wager to win 5 units (6.9 units wagered in this scenario). i was under the impression that it was common practice when it is plus money that you wager 5 units and when it is minus money you wager to win 5 units.. thanks man and keep it up
Yes, I only wagered 5 UNITS flat. All of my bets are don in this manner. Glad you tailed along
0
Quote Originally Posted by dtracy219:
xbaggy got a quick question for you....
tailed your 5 unit play last and you crushed it. Noticed however, you only list that you are up 3.64 units for 5 unit plays... when you place you wagers and it is minus money, for instance vancouver at -138, do you only wager 5 units flat or do you wager to win 5 units (6.9 units wagered in this scenario). i was under the impression that it was common practice when it is plus money that you wager 5 units and when it is minus money you wager to win 5 units.. thanks man and keep it up
Yes, I only wagered 5 UNITS flat. All of my bets are don in this manner. Glad you tailed along
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.