1.8 units on the "over" ey ?
It is actually. I'm in the middle of a little system, bets are set % of a starting roll. So, it isn't a typo
1.8 units on the "over" ey ?
It is actually. I'm in the middle of a little system, bets are set % of a starting roll. So, it isn't a typo
Battler, I'd be more inclined to look at the 1st half over (92.5) than the whole thing.
If you look at Wildcats home games over the last couple of years, quite a number of them have had the scoring completely dry up down the stretch, particularly from the Wildcats themselves.
just my two-bob
Battler, I'd be more inclined to look at the 1st half over (92.5) than the whole thing.
If you look at Wildcats home games over the last couple of years, quite a number of them have had the scoring completely dry up down the stretch, particularly from the Wildcats themselves.
just my two-bob
Battler, I'd be more inclined to look at the 1st half over (92.5) than the whole thing.
If you look at Wildcats home games over the last couple of years, quite a number of them have had the scoring completely dry up down the stretch, particularly from the Wildcats themselves.
just my two-bob
Yeah, thought about this JT. It's not just the Cats who display this trend of second half droughts, it's the whole league. The over is semi based on my Hawks play. I think for the Hawks to cover, they'll have to keep scoring. Either way, too late now. I've got nearly 5 units tied up in this, so I'm not adding anymore
Battler, I'd be more inclined to look at the 1st half over (92.5) than the whole thing.
If you look at Wildcats home games over the last couple of years, quite a number of them have had the scoring completely dry up down the stretch, particularly from the Wildcats themselves.
just my two-bob
Yeah, thought about this JT. It's not just the Cats who display this trend of second half droughts, it's the whole league. The over is semi based on my Hawks play. I think for the Hawks to cover, they'll have to keep scoring. Either way, too late now. I've got nearly 5 units tied up in this, so I'm not adding anymore
Hey Tezza, can I call you Tezza?
Welcome to the forum mate. I might nominate you to the covers team for funkiest username of the month. If you are going to tear anyone's arse off, let's hope it is your bookie's. Unless of course your surname is Zarzzoff, in which case I apologise for mocking your name on an internet forum.
Either way, welcome aboard and look fwd to discussing sports with you. Best of luck on your NBL wagers this week
Hey Tezza, can I call you Tezza?
Welcome to the forum mate. I might nominate you to the covers team for funkiest username of the month. If you are going to tear anyone's arse off, let's hope it is your bookie's. Unless of course your surname is Zarzzoff, in which case I apologise for mocking your name on an internet forum.
Either way, welcome aboard and look fwd to discussing sports with you. Best of luck on your NBL wagers this week
Is THIS legit?
Couldn't be this far in could it?
lets hope so in a wider sense mate, I've been waiting for the day the NBL adopted the same live score setup as the WNBL
Definately, looks light years ahead of the other shit they trotted out for so long
lets hope so in a wider sense mate, I've been waiting for the day the NBL adopted the same live score setup as the WNBL
Definately, looks light years ahead of the other shit they trotted out for so long
hawks have been a tricky teams to deal with from a totals betting point of view ever since Brendan Joyce left
I tend to think of them as a bit of a "chameleon" team in that they seem to play to the pace of their opposition, but this is certainly interesting so far
hawks have been a tricky teams to deal with from a totals betting point of view ever since Brendan Joyce left
I tend to think of them as a bit of a "chameleon" team in that they seem to play to the pace of their opposition, but this is certainly interesting so far
Live score is brilliant when compared to what we had.
NBL
About fucking time
Live score is brilliant when compared to what we had.
NBL
About fucking time
hawks have been a tricky teams to deal with from a totals betting point of view ever since Brendan Joyce left
I tend to think of them as a bit of a "chameleon" team in that they seem to play to the pace of their opposition, but this is certainly interesting so far
I thought they have looked ok so far this year in terms of offense, and with Tragardh back I was confident they would score points. What I didn't envisage was the Cats shooting lights out. 110 in the first half bodes well for my over (and would have nailed the half over you suggested).
hawks have been a tricky teams to deal with from a totals betting point of view ever since Brendan Joyce left
I tend to think of them as a bit of a "chameleon" team in that they seem to play to the pace of their opposition, but this is certainly interesting so far
I thought they have looked ok so far this year in terms of offense, and with Tragardh back I was confident they would score points. What I didn't envisage was the Cats shooting lights out. 110 in the first half bodes well for my over (and would have nailed the half over you suggested).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.