I see the under has been smashed for this game......
Wollongong scored 83 points DESPITE shooting 40% (not very good), and 30% from 3 and only 61% from the stripe......
Crocs scored 79 playing a Taipans team that has been know ever since its inception to play low scoring scrappy defensive games....Crocs shot 45% (not bad), 33% from 3 point land.....
Wouldnt one expect Wollongong for starters to improve on those shooting percentages from there rusty 1 game?
The Hawks at home generally dont play scrappy grinding games like the Taipans do, so i would expect the Crocs to score more....
BUT, the under has been hit.........
And ACE - if u look at the back end of games last year, (the last 10 the Hawks played at home), they have been very high scoring even with there leading scorer and assist "getter" gone......
Give me the rational here......considering the PUBLIC were EXPECTING perth and the Breakers to improve on bad shooting, the public here are expecting bad shooting to go even worse?
Cmon, anyone give me a rational for this.....
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I see the under has been smashed for this game......
Wollongong scored 83 points DESPITE shooting 40% (not very good), and 30% from 3 and only 61% from the stripe......
Crocs scored 79 playing a Taipans team that has been know ever since its inception to play low scoring scrappy defensive games....Crocs shot 45% (not bad), 33% from 3 point land.....
Wouldnt one expect Wollongong for starters to improve on those shooting percentages from there rusty 1 game?
The Hawks at home generally dont play scrappy grinding games like the Taipans do, so i would expect the Crocs to score more....
BUT, the under has been hit.........
And ACE - if u look at the back end of games last year, (the last 10 the Hawks played at home), they have been very high scoring even with there leading scorer and assist "getter" gone......
Give me the rational here......considering the PUBLIC were EXPECTING perth and the Breakers to improve on bad shooting, the public here are expecting bad shooting to go even worse?
I see the under has been smashed for this game......
Wollongong scored 83 points DESPITE shooting 40% (not very good), and 30% from 3 and only 61% from the stripe......
Crocs scored 79 playing a Taipans team that has been know ever since its inception to play low scoring scrappy defensive games....Crocs shot 45% (not bad), 33% from 3 point land.....
Wouldnt one expect Wollongong for starters to improve on those shooting percentages from there rusty 1 game?
The Hawks at home generally dont play scrappy grinding games like the Taipans do, so i would expect the Crocs to score more....
BUT, the under has been hit.........
And ACE - if u look at the back end of games last year, (the last 10 the Hawks played at home), they have been very high scoring even with there leading scorer and assist "getter" gone......
Give me the rational here......considering the PUBLIC were EXPECTING perth and the Breakers to improve on bad shooting, the public here are expecting bad shooting to go even worse?
Cmon, anyone give me a rational for this.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
I see the under has been smashed for this game......
Wollongong scored 83 points DESPITE shooting 40% (not very good), and 30% from 3 and only 61% from the stripe......
Crocs scored 79 playing a Taipans team that has been know ever since its inception to play low scoring scrappy defensive games....Crocs shot 45% (not bad), 33% from 3 point land.....
Wouldnt one expect Wollongong for starters to improve on those shooting percentages from there rusty 1 game?
The Hawks at home generally dont play scrappy grinding games like the Taipans do, so i would expect the Crocs to score more....
BUT, the under has been hit.........
And ACE - if u look at the back end of games last year, (the last 10 the Hawks played at home), they have been very high scoring even with there leading scorer and assist "getter" gone......
Give me the rational here......considering the PUBLIC were EXPECTING perth and the Breakers to improve on bad shooting, the public here are expecting bad shooting to go even worse?
If this game goes over......I will shut up and never ever mention fix and NBL in the same sentence ever again........if it goes under, no one can say a word........
There is zero rational for this under......Both teams combined last week for 162 despite shooting pretty poorly.....The public expect the poor shooting to go even worse? But they expected the poor shooting of Perth and NZ to miracolously to jump?
No one give me the "look at what NZ scored last year".Well look at what Wollongong scored in the last 10 home games last year even without there leading scorer
0
If this game goes over......I will shut up and never ever mention fix and NBL in the same sentence ever again........if it goes under, no one can say a word........
There is zero rational for this under......Both teams combined last week for 162 despite shooting pretty poorly.....The public expect the poor shooting to go even worse? But they expected the poor shooting of Perth and NZ to miracolously to jump?
No one give me the "look at what NZ scored last year".Well look at what Wollongong scored in the last 10 home games last year even without there leading scorer
Backing overs in NBL you're doomed to failure. As has been the case in the last two years. Until there is drastic improvements consistently, I will never be touching an over.
0
Backing overs in NBL you're doomed to failure. As has been the case in the last two years. Until there is drastic improvements consistently, I will never be touching an over.
And I'll add, I'll prove that by the end of the season by being in a profit. Unless of course, a miracle happens and they start scoring high like they did in 06-07.
0
And I'll add, I'll prove that by the end of the season by being in a profit. Unless of course, a miracle happens and they start scoring high like they did in 06-07.
And I'll add, I'll prove that by the end of the season by being in a profit. Unless of course, a miracle happens and they start scoring high like they did in 06-07.
Bullets & Kings
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bolar:
And I'll add, I'll prove that by the end of the season by being in a profit. Unless of course, a miracle happens and they start scoring high like they did in 06-07.
Also, since when do punters bring up last years results? I thought u were better than that.....
Do that in the NRL and u wull be toast........
Newcastle were unbeatable at home last year.......What happened this year?
"And ACE - if u look at the back end of games last year, (the last 10 the
Hawks played at home), they have been very high scoring even with there
leading scorer and assist "getter" gone...."
Only Rostos can mentioned what happened last year?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
Also, since when do punters bring up last years results? I thought u were better than that.....
Do that in the NRL and u wull be toast........
Newcastle were unbeatable at home last year.......What happened this year?
"And ACE - if u look at the back end of games last year, (the last 10 the
Hawks played at home), they have been very high scoring even with there
leading scorer and assist "getter" gone...."
Only Rostos can mentioned what happened last year?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.