YTD: 15-3 +14.8u
NZ v Townsville over 200.5 1u
I am thinking one player, Homicide Williams can make a fair bit of difference for Townsville and they will score some more points. Back in round 1 with R Ellis they beat West Sydney 116-114 with Pepper having 22, Rillie 20, Robertson 18 and Young 13. Supposedely he plays an uptempo style which suggests to me that the crocs will return to their approach of jack it up quick and play token defence.
Breakers gave been playing ok but shooting the ball poorly. Game 1: 2pt%=53% and 3pt% =25% and game 2: 2pt%=43% and 3pt% =34%. They have decent shooters in Penny, Jones, Foreman and Turner plus Rickert and Ronaldson can be effecient inside. Against the Townsville token D I like their chances of putting up a score.
YTD: 15-3 +14.8u
NZ v Townsville over 200.5 1u
I am thinking one player, Homicide Williams can make a fair bit of difference for Townsville and they will score some more points. Back in round 1 with R Ellis they beat West Sydney 116-114 with Pepper having 22, Rillie 20, Robertson 18 and Young 13. Supposedely he plays an uptempo style which suggests to me that the crocs will return to their approach of jack it up quick and play token defence.
Breakers gave been playing ok but shooting the ball poorly. Game 1: 2pt%=53% and 3pt% =25% and game 2: 2pt%=43% and 3pt% =34%. They have decent shooters in Penny, Jones, Foreman and Turner plus Rickert and Ronaldson can be effecient inside. Against the Townsville token D I like their chances of putting up a score.
YTD: 15-4 +13.8u
Wollongong +3 1u
Initial thought was West Sydney but I have come around to the Hawks. Wollongong have played with spirit getting back door covers against Adelaide and Melbourne without looking like winning and could have beat Cairns last wound with a bit of luck missing one of their imports James Peters.
In my opinion they have a squad that is likely to continue to play hard all season even if they only win a handful of games. This is partly due to it being unlikely that there will be modelling contacts waiting for them when they stop playing semi professional basketball https://www.hawks.com.au/default.aspx?s=players. More so it is because they appreciate their opportunity and play hard and would not still be in the league if they didn't. Tragardh who i never thought much of has shown that he has a fair bit to offer. Something i was interested to find was he "led the ABA nationally in scoring in 2002 with 34 points per game" according to the Hawks website. I think Dragons would be starting to question why the traded Kavossy Franklin for Cortez Groves, Cortez may have the edge in athleticism and skills but Kavossy has him in spirit and toughness for mine, which you can't get enough of.
Think Hawks will give it everything and have a good chance to get their first win, with West Sydney missing a couple of players Knight and Petrie.
Wollongong v West Sydney under 203.5 1u
By my calculations the average score in the regular season last year was 205. So far this season I have it at 193. I don't have any numbers on hand, but from memory 193 is not far off the NBA average and still higher than in most Euro leagues.
Some of the possible reasons I can think of for the drop are better defence, worse offence, slower tempo, less defensive fouls and/or more offensive fouls.
Difficult to measure the first two, however given I would rate Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Cairns and Perth as the best defensive teams last year, given these teams filled the top positions maybe some of the other teams have come to the strange belief that you need to play defence to be successful.
So far there does seem to be a slowing in the tempo. This my be because several teams have realised that running around jacking up shots as soon as possible while entertaining, may not be that successful. Another reason may be more big imports leading to a slower pace. Adelaide lose Farley get Chappell, Melbourne lose Tucker get Mursepp, NZ lose Powell get Rickert.
West Sydney have said that they plan to push the tempo at every opportunity. Wollongong have said one of their goals is to keep sides to less than 20 points per quarter. The first goal is easier to achieve than the second, however until some more points get scored I too will be leaning towards the under.
YTD: 15-4 +13.8u
Wollongong +3 1u
Initial thought was West Sydney but I have come around to the Hawks. Wollongong have played with spirit getting back door covers against Adelaide and Melbourne without looking like winning and could have beat Cairns last wound with a bit of luck missing one of their imports James Peters.
In my opinion they have a squad that is likely to continue to play hard all season even if they only win a handful of games. This is partly due to it being unlikely that there will be modelling contacts waiting for them when they stop playing semi professional basketball https://www.hawks.com.au/default.aspx?s=players. More so it is because they appreciate their opportunity and play hard and would not still be in the league if they didn't. Tragardh who i never thought much of has shown that he has a fair bit to offer. Something i was interested to find was he "led the ABA nationally in scoring in 2002 with 34 points per game" according to the Hawks website. I think Dragons would be starting to question why the traded Kavossy Franklin for Cortez Groves, Cortez may have the edge in athleticism and skills but Kavossy has him in spirit and toughness for mine, which you can't get enough of.
Think Hawks will give it everything and have a good chance to get their first win, with West Sydney missing a couple of players Knight and Petrie.
Wollongong v West Sydney under 203.5 1u
By my calculations the average score in the regular season last year was 205. So far this season I have it at 193. I don't have any numbers on hand, but from memory 193 is not far off the NBA average and still higher than in most Euro leagues.
Some of the possible reasons I can think of for the drop are better defence, worse offence, slower tempo, less defensive fouls and/or more offensive fouls.
Difficult to measure the first two, however given I would rate Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Cairns and Perth as the best defensive teams last year, given these teams filled the top positions maybe some of the other teams have come to the strange belief that you need to play defence to be successful.
So far there does seem to be a slowing in the tempo. This my be because several teams have realised that running around jacking up shots as soon as possible while entertaining, may not be that successful. Another reason may be more big imports leading to a slower pace. Adelaide lose Farley get Chappell, Melbourne lose Tucker get Mursepp, NZ lose Powell get Rickert.
West Sydney have said that they plan to push the tempo at every opportunity. Wollongong have said one of their goals is to keep sides to less than 20 points per quarter. The first goal is easier to achieve than the second, however until some more points get scored I too will be leaning towards the under.
South Dragons owner Mark Cowan has backed player-coach Shane Heal despite the NBL club facing a winless start to the season, something that cost previous coach Mark Price his job last season.
The Dragons are 0-3 and could be 0-5 by Sunday night with weekend matches against the unbeaten Melbourne Tigers and Sydney Kings.
The Dragons were 0-5 last year when Cowan fired former NBA legend Price and appointed Heal.
But there is unlikely to be any blood-letting should a similar scenario arise this season, with Cowan saying he believed in what Heal was trying to achieve.
"I've got faith in the process that Shane has got the club going through and it's not how you start, it's how you finish," Cowan said. https://www.theage.com.au/news/Sport/South-Dragons-boss-says-Heal-is-safe/2007/10/12/1191696163443.html
Maybe they will rally similar to Wollongong, but it sounds to me that they are already resigned to being 0-6, with Sydney and Brisbane up after Melbourne:
'Dragons co-captain Jacob Holmes said the players were keen to step up against the Tigers in the Melbourne derby at the State Netball Centre on Saturday night to kick-start their season.
"We're not 0-6 yet and we don't want to get to that stage again," Holmes said.
"If we can get a win, it eases the pressure on everyone, including the coach." '(same article)
Sounds more like resignation than detemination to me.
Even if they do fire up i think the will be outclassed.
With Burston playing like a mong, Horvath has to start at centre and in my opinion he is no where near up to it. As I recall when he was in a force in the league was when he had Simon Dwight arguably the best shot blocker in league history playing centre and he was playing forward. In the tv game v perth he was wetting himself when they gave Rogers the ball in the post and several times gave up panic fouls. If Perth had given Rogers more low post touches he would have fouled out before half time. My feeling is Anstey and/or Mursepp will embarass him again.
With Groves out and Mr Jingles having an ordinairy start to the season, they don't have the quality to match it with Melbourne in the other positions.
The main risk is that Melbourne take the game easy and Souths cover without looking like winning. This is a possibility but I am hoping the cross town rivalry sees Melbourne keep the foot down and given their should be a packed house of Melbourne fans I cant see them taking it easy. I think its quite likely Souths will be throwing up prayer 3s like they did against Perth for most of the game and they wont even get close in the second half unless they hit alot of them.
South Dragons owner Mark Cowan has backed player-coach Shane Heal despite the NBL club facing a winless start to the season, something that cost previous coach Mark Price his job last season.
The Dragons are 0-3 and could be 0-5 by Sunday night with weekend matches against the unbeaten Melbourne Tigers and Sydney Kings.
The Dragons were 0-5 last year when Cowan fired former NBA legend Price and appointed Heal.
But there is unlikely to be any blood-letting should a similar scenario arise this season, with Cowan saying he believed in what Heal was trying to achieve.
"I've got faith in the process that Shane has got the club going through and it's not how you start, it's how you finish," Cowan said. https://www.theage.com.au/news/Sport/South-Dragons-boss-says-Heal-is-safe/2007/10/12/1191696163443.html
Maybe they will rally similar to Wollongong, but it sounds to me that they are already resigned to being 0-6, with Sydney and Brisbane up after Melbourne:
'Dragons co-captain Jacob Holmes said the players were keen to step up against the Tigers in the Melbourne derby at the State Netball Centre on Saturday night to kick-start their season.
"We're not 0-6 yet and we don't want to get to that stage again," Holmes said.
"If we can get a win, it eases the pressure on everyone, including the coach." '(same article)
Sounds more like resignation than detemination to me.
Even if they do fire up i think the will be outclassed.
With Burston playing like a mong, Horvath has to start at centre and in my opinion he is no where near up to it. As I recall when he was in a force in the league was when he had Simon Dwight arguably the best shot blocker in league history playing centre and he was playing forward. In the tv game v perth he was wetting himself when they gave Rogers the ball in the post and several times gave up panic fouls. If Perth had given Rogers more low post touches he would have fouled out before half time. My feeling is Anstey and/or Mursepp will embarass him again.
With Groves out and Mr Jingles having an ordinairy start to the season, they don't have the quality to match it with Melbourne in the other positions.
The main risk is that Melbourne take the game easy and Souths cover without looking like winning. This is a possibility but I am hoping the cross town rivalry sees Melbourne keep the foot down and given their should be a packed house of Melbourne fans I cant see them taking it easy. I think its quite likely Souths will be throwing up prayer 3s like they did against Perth for most of the game and they wont even get close in the second half unless they hit alot of them.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.