On Friday, in sportsguru2013's thread titled "Friday Baseball Are You Freakin Serious?!!!", sportsguru2013 posted his picks. I quoted the following...
If you think Miami will go into St.Louis today and win, i want some of whatever it is that you are smoking..
....and I wrote this...
I'm on the Marlins +170.
The ninth post in the thread was submitted by Scorpio85, who wrote...
If I took the opposite on each one of those, I may win more outright than ur bets will...
Not being rude or anything, just pointing it out...the dogs have been helping lately.
I wrote the tenth post, which was...
I'm on the opposite of three and strongly considering the opposite of the other two. It's just the way it worked out.
On Saturday, sportsguru2013 started a thread titled "For Thoes That Said My Picks Were Crazy." His first post said this...
some said my picks were crazy and didnt have a chance to win. Some even
said they were going opposite of me. Needless to say most lost their
money before 6pm yesterday.. Yesterday I went 3-1 pirates rays jays reds
today i am not switching up. pirates jays rays
I submitted the thread's third post, in which I quoted the following...
some said my picks were crazy and didnt have a chance to win.
...and then wrote...
No one said those words. Quit being a baby. Act like you've had a
winning day before. Congratulations on almost all of the square
favorites winning yesterday.
Then I submitted the fourth post in which I quoted the following...
Some even said they were going opposite of me. Needless to say most lost their money before 6pm yesterday..
...and then wrote...
That won't happen often.
Then I submitted the fifth post, in which I quoted sportsguru2013 one last time, highlighting and enlarging the words "today I am not switching up"...
Yesterday I went 3-1 pirates rays jays reds
today i am not switching up. pirates jays rays
...and then I wrote...
No shi.t. Chalk players never do.
This was the only thread I posted in on Saturday morning. Within a few minutes of my last post, I was boxed. Can the moderator who made this decision please explain this?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
On Friday, in sportsguru2013's thread titled "Friday Baseball Are You Freakin Serious?!!!", sportsguru2013 posted his picks. I quoted the following...
If you think Miami will go into St.Louis today and win, i want some of whatever it is that you are smoking..
....and I wrote this...
I'm on the Marlins +170.
The ninth post in the thread was submitted by Scorpio85, who wrote...
If I took the opposite on each one of those, I may win more outright than ur bets will...
Not being rude or anything, just pointing it out...the dogs have been helping lately.
I wrote the tenth post, which was...
I'm on the opposite of three and strongly considering the opposite of the other two. It's just the way it worked out.
On Saturday, sportsguru2013 started a thread titled "For Thoes That Said My Picks Were Crazy." His first post said this...
some said my picks were crazy and didnt have a chance to win. Some even
said they were going opposite of me. Needless to say most lost their
money before 6pm yesterday.. Yesterday I went 3-1 pirates rays jays reds
today i am not switching up. pirates jays rays
I submitted the thread's third post, in which I quoted the following...
some said my picks were crazy and didnt have a chance to win.
...and then wrote...
No one said those words. Quit being a baby. Act like you've had a
winning day before. Congratulations on almost all of the square
favorites winning yesterday.
Then I submitted the fourth post in which I quoted the following...
Some even said they were going opposite of me. Needless to say most lost their money before 6pm yesterday..
...and then wrote...
That won't happen often.
Then I submitted the fifth post, in which I quoted sportsguru2013 one last time, highlighting and enlarging the words "today I am not switching up"...
Yesterday I went 3-1 pirates rays jays reds
today i am not switching up. pirates jays rays
...and then I wrote...
No shi.t. Chalk players never do.
This was the only thread I posted in on Saturday morning. Within a few minutes of my last post, I was boxed. Can the moderator who made this decision please explain this?
Quit crying like a baby and take the sentence like a man . He told you to quit being combative, so do it!. I will review your file, and you should be out in 2-3 months........ if you behave
0
Quit crying like a baby and take the sentence like a man . He told you to quit being combative, so do it!. I will review your file, and you should be out in 2-3 months........ if you behave
Quit crying like a baby and take the sentence like a man . He told you to quit being combative, so do it!. I will review your file, and you should be out in 2-3 months........ if you behave
Be careful. The words "quit crying like a baby" are evidently grounds for being boxed! Try not to use such combative language. In fact, the next time you are going to be combative, try not to be combative.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
Quit crying like a baby and take the sentence like a man . He told you to quit being combative, so do it!. I will review your file, and you should be out in 2-3 months........ if you behave
Be careful. The words "quit crying like a baby" are evidently grounds for being boxed! Try not to use such combative language. In fact, the next time you are going to be combative, try not to be combative.
Mr B you didnt know this site is G rated these days? The level of entertainment on this site has gone from an 8 to a 2. I pop in for a few minutes each day to check a few posters who's opinions I respect but other than that this place sucks.
0
Mr B you didnt know this site is G rated these days? The level of entertainment on this site has gone from an 8 to a 2. I pop in for a few minutes each day to check a few posters who's opinions I respect but other than that this place sucks.
Next time if you are going to be combative, try avoiding making the comment.
I wish someone pointed out to me my squareness when I laying -250 or greater on Roger Clemens 25 years ago. It might have stung initially but in time I would've grown to appreciate the wake-up slap in the face.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
You didnt need to go after the poster like that.
Next time if you are going to be combative, try avoiding making the comment.
I wish someone pointed out to me my squareness when I laying -250 or greater on Roger Clemens 25 years ago. It might have stung initially but in time I would've grown to appreciate the wake-up slap in the face.
I wish someone pointed out to me my squareness when I laying -250 or greater on Oil Can Boyd 25 years ago. It might have stung initially but in time I would've grown to appreciate the wake-up slap in the face.
Fixed that for ya :)
Yea free bator. His post was nuthin but a constructive criticism. He meant no ill will and did not use offensive language.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Luvv-to-gamble:
I wish someone pointed out to me my squareness when I laying -250 or greater on Oil Can Boyd 25 years ago. It might have stung initially but in time I would've grown to appreciate the wake-up slap in the face.
Fixed that for ya :)
Yea free bator. His post was nuthin but a constructive criticism. He meant no ill will and did not use offensive language.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.