Both teams first playoff appearance in like 7 years . Bengals dominated the first matchup . Books and public expect a shootout
Pats / Bills -4.5 OU 43.5
Split the season games . Two of the best defenses playing in a cold stadium . Have to check weather on this one . Should be a great game
Eagles / Bucs -9 OU 49
Best rushing team vs the best passing team . This will come down to how well Hurts handles the pressure
49ers / Cowboys -3 OU 49.5
Should be a great game . Shrimp is giving rum to Joboo as we speak . Think this total is high . Lean under
Steelers / Chiefs -13 OU 46.5
Hmmm. I just dont think the Steelers can keep up in this one . Ben just not mobile enough and wont have time to drop back.
Cards / Rams -4 OU 50.5
Man the Rams look horrific . Definitely not the team they were early on . As a Cards fan I was surprised to see the books put out a 4 . Cards or nothing
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Raiders / Bengals -6.5 OU 49
Both teams first playoff appearance in like 7 years . Bengals dominated the first matchup . Books and public expect a shootout
Pats / Bills -4.5 OU 43.5
Split the season games . Two of the best defenses playing in a cold stadium . Have to check weather on this one . Should be a great game
Eagles / Bucs -9 OU 49
Best rushing team vs the best passing team . This will come down to how well Hurts handles the pressure
49ers / Cowboys -3 OU 49.5
Should be a great game . Shrimp is giving rum to Joboo as we speak . Think this total is high . Lean under
Steelers / Chiefs -13 OU 46.5
Hmmm. I just dont think the Steelers can keep up in this one . Ben just not mobile enough and wont have time to drop back.
Cards / Rams -4 OU 50.5
Man the Rams look horrific . Definitely not the team they were early on . As a Cards fan I was surprised to see the books put out a 4 . Cards or nothing
Can't remember the year but Hugh ran his playoff football giveaway and I went close to 0-fer. I took all the dogs and the favs won at an unprecedented clip. Needless to say, I have no fucking clue who will cover or not cover.
0
Can't remember the year but Hugh ran his playoff football giveaway and I went close to 0-fer. I took all the dogs and the favs won at an unprecedented clip. Needless to say, I have no fucking clue who will cover or not cover.
Can't remember the year but Hugh ran his playoff football giveaway and I went close to 0-fer. I took all the dogs and the favs won at an unprecedented clip. Needless to say, I have no fucking clue who will cover or not cover.
I don't see any dog winning su. And that's just terrible.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lbcake:
Can't remember the year but Hugh ran his playoff football giveaway and I went close to 0-fer. I took all the dogs and the favs won at an unprecedented clip. Needless to say, I have no fucking clue who will cover or not cover.
I don't see any dog winning su. And that's just terrible.
Playoff teams by conference ranked by total DVOA (first number). Second number is weighted DVOA which rewards recent form, and the third number is point differential.
AFC
BUFF 3, 5, +194
NE 4, 1, +159
KC 6, 3, +116
CINCI 17, 14, +84
TENN 19, 15, +65
LVR 21, 20, (65)
PITT 23, 26, (55)
0
Playoff teams by conference ranked by total DVOA (first number). Second number is weighted DVOA which rewards recent form, and the third number is point differential.
@undermysac 49 ers gonna send Tigger back to the zoo where he belongs...
Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed.
Relax, it's only 8 months until the Shrimp play another game.
Just wear your Ray Lewis underoos while sitting in your purple painted living room and beating off to your Ray Rice Fathead. (couple of upstanding citizens named Ray right there ) That will make it go faster ... and don't forget to read the latest issue of "Why Punt Returners Suck At QB" magazine while wearing your Ngata jersey with the mustard stains on it
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84:
@undermysac 49 ers gonna send Tigger back to the zoo where he belongs...
Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed.
Relax, it's only 8 months until the Shrimp play another game.
Just wear your Ray Lewis underoos while sitting in your purple painted living room and beating off to your Ray Rice Fathead. (couple of upstanding citizens named Ray right there ) That will make it go faster ... and don't forget to read the latest issue of "Why Punt Returners Suck At QB" magazine while wearing your Ngata jersey with the mustard stains on it
Going by the match-ups, the NFL gave us 1 good game on each of the 3 days.
The regular season finished in epic form. As soon as BWS said something about the days games sucking, we got the SF-LAR game, and then the LAC-LV game. Couple of great matches back to back. Good finish to the regular season
bigreds daddy
0
@trainwreck66
Going by the match-ups, the NFL gave us 1 good game on each of the 3 days.
The regular season finished in epic form. As soon as BWS said something about the days games sucking, we got the SF-LAR game, and then the LAC-LV game. Couple of great matches back to back. Good finish to the regular season
No doubt.....my plays sucked yesterday but half unit bets with teasers and such as its usually a debacle . Watching the Indy postgame was good though . Can someone explain why bigred is so angry ? He did PM me and has a bucket of KFC ...rum and candles going under the Joboo statue . If the Cowboys lose to the 49ers we may have an unprecedented number of posts that may last well into the summer . You fellas need to play WKBL unders though if you can
0
@Hugh_Jorgan
No doubt.....my plays sucked yesterday but half unit bets with teasers and such as its usually a debacle . Watching the Indy postgame was good though . Can someone explain why bigred is so angry ? He did PM me and has a bucket of KFC ...rum and candles going under the Joboo statue . If the Cowboys lose to the 49ers we may have an unprecedented number of posts that may last well into the summer . You fellas need to play WKBL unders though if you can
Thanks for posting those #'s. I'm convinced that a team from the nfc wins the SB.
I talked about picking the nfc to win the SB a few weeks ago when I posted dvoa stuff. They early options were either afc or nfc -.5 for -110 each. Today at Betonline the nfc is -2.5 ats, and -140 ML.
0
@Getty3
Thanks for posting those #'s. I'm convinced that a team from the nfc wins the SB.
I talked about picking the nfc to win the SB a few weeks ago when I posted dvoa stuff. They early options were either afc or nfc -.5 for -110 each. Today at Betonline the nfc is -2.5 ats, and -140 ML.
@undermysac 49 ers gonna send Tigger back to the zoo where he belongs...
Dallas might be the best team in the playoffs by the #'s. They just need to button up and play clean. Too many penalties, but that's kind of a Mccarthy thing. The guy isn't a drill sergeant.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84:
@undermysac 49 ers gonna send Tigger back to the zoo where he belongs...
Dallas might be the best team in the playoffs by the #'s. They just need to button up and play clean. Too many penalties, but that's kind of a Mccarthy thing. The guy isn't a drill sergeant.
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84: @undermysac 49 ers gonna send Tigger back to the zoo where he belongs... Dallas might be the best team in the playoffs by the #'s. They just need to button up and play clean. Too many penalties, but that's kind of a Mccarthy thing. The guy isn't a drill sergeant.
Numbers are cute but when you look at a meh record against good teams (over .500) including wins against backup QB's (Hill, Cashew)... add in history of playoff chokes, nobody should be too high on them
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84: @undermysac 49 ers gonna send Tigger back to the zoo where he belongs... Dallas might be the best team in the playoffs by the #'s. They just need to button up and play clean. Too many penalties, but that's kind of a Mccarthy thing. The guy isn't a drill sergeant.
Numbers are cute but when you look at a meh record against good teams (over .500) including wins against backup QB's (Hill, Cashew)... add in history of playoff chokes, nobody should be too high on them
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.