Imagine thinking that electric heating and cooking is better It’s amazing how stupid Democrats are
I wouldn't say it's better. Not for my taste. And it's definite not as efficient. Yet if i'm building a 700 unit building in a densely populated area... This is San Francisco we're talking about. These aren't single family homes. And most new construction is build with electric heating and stove/ovens. You're just purposely being dense to find ridiculous arguments.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
1
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Imagine thinking that electric heating and cooking is better It’s amazing how stupid Democrats are
I wouldn't say it's better. Not for my taste. And it's definite not as efficient. Yet if i'm building a 700 unit building in a densely populated area... This is San Francisco we're talking about. These aren't single family homes. And most new construction is build with electric heating and stove/ovens. You're just purposely being dense to find ridiculous arguments.
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Imagine thinking that electric heating and cooking is better It’s amazing how stupid Democrats are I wouldn't say it's better. Not for my taste. And it's definite not as efficient. Yet if i'm building a 700 unit building in a densely populated area... This is San Francisco we're talking about. These aren't single family homes. And most new construction is build with electric heating and stove/ovens. You're just purposely being dense to find ridiculous arguments.
There's also the spectre of the San Bruno gas line fire that leveled a neighborhood in a San Francisco suburb. Granted, on average, electricity causes more fires than natural gas but you are more likely to see that fire turn into a "towering inferno" with the presence of natural gas lines. Frankly, you'd be hard pressed to find the presence of natural gas lines in new construction in just about any urban environment. Not just in California. Some developers run lines for gas fireplaces, burning logs being frowned upon as well, but still install electric heaters and ovens/stoves. Again, based on your numbers, most of these will be very small apartments and studios. And you're suggesting the best course of action would be to run gas lines do that these tightly packed 500 sq. ft. apartments all have gas appliances. And then you have the audacity to call someone else's intelligence into question. Hell, this was probably a pointless law to pass because no developer in their right mind would have ever done this anyway. Not to mention i'm sure there are loopholes for the rare instance when using gas is the best course of action. Look, I hate electric ovens/stove tops. And electricity is literally the least efficient way to heat a space but when you go posting these nonsense little factoids that i'm sure you're getting from some facebook group of some sort, atleast think about what you're writing.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
1
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Imagine thinking that electric heating and cooking is better It’s amazing how stupid Democrats are I wouldn't say it's better. Not for my taste. And it's definite not as efficient. Yet if i'm building a 700 unit building in a densely populated area... This is San Francisco we're talking about. These aren't single family homes. And most new construction is build with electric heating and stove/ovens. You're just purposely being dense to find ridiculous arguments.
There's also the spectre of the San Bruno gas line fire that leveled a neighborhood in a San Francisco suburb. Granted, on average, electricity causes more fires than natural gas but you are more likely to see that fire turn into a "towering inferno" with the presence of natural gas lines. Frankly, you'd be hard pressed to find the presence of natural gas lines in new construction in just about any urban environment. Not just in California. Some developers run lines for gas fireplaces, burning logs being frowned upon as well, but still install electric heaters and ovens/stoves. Again, based on your numbers, most of these will be very small apartments and studios. And you're suggesting the best course of action would be to run gas lines do that these tightly packed 500 sq. ft. apartments all have gas appliances. And then you have the audacity to call someone else's intelligence into question. Hell, this was probably a pointless law to pass because no developer in their right mind would have ever done this anyway. Not to mention i'm sure there are loopholes for the rare instance when using gas is the best course of action. Look, I hate electric ovens/stove tops. And electricity is literally the least efficient way to heat a space but when you go posting these nonsense little factoids that i'm sure you're getting from some facebook group of some sort, atleast think about what you're writing.
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: “The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Tuesday to ban natural gas in new construction, legislation that will apply to more than 54,000 homes and 32 million square feet in the city’s development pipeline.” How stupid are Democrats? I think the bigger issue is that based on your numbers those 54,000 new "homes" will have an average square footage of 592. And when you realize these "homes" will be probably be worth like a million dollars. As far as recognizing an antiquated energy source and taking steps to move on from it... yeah, those democrats are really stupid to not build brand new apartments equipped with furnaces like it's 1920.
That is not what the bigger issue is at all. It is estimated 54,000 new homes AND an additional 32 million square feet of new commercial space will not allow natural gas. Instead they will be forced to use electricity. Which is quite the opposite of using furnaces like it is 1920. Nothing at all like that, in fact, quite the opposite. Now they are not given the option of a cheaper and more efficient technology -- but are forced to use an older, more expensive, and more costly method.
The overall bigger issue is that somewhere around 40 cities in California have instituted this. They have done this purely to promote the liberal agenda of forcing folks to use something they deem less impactful on the climate. That is where the bigger issue is.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: “The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Tuesday to ban natural gas in new construction, legislation that will apply to more than 54,000 homes and 32 million square feet in the city’s development pipeline.” How stupid are Democrats? I think the bigger issue is that based on your numbers those 54,000 new "homes" will have an average square footage of 592. And when you realize these "homes" will be probably be worth like a million dollars. As far as recognizing an antiquated energy source and taking steps to move on from it... yeah, those democrats are really stupid to not build brand new apartments equipped with furnaces like it's 1920.
That is not what the bigger issue is at all. It is estimated 54,000 new homes AND an additional 32 million square feet of new commercial space will not allow natural gas. Instead they will be forced to use electricity. Which is quite the opposite of using furnaces like it is 1920. Nothing at all like that, in fact, quite the opposite. Now they are not given the option of a cheaper and more efficient technology -- but are forced to use an older, more expensive, and more costly method.
The overall bigger issue is that somewhere around 40 cities in California have instituted this. They have done this purely to promote the liberal agenda of forcing folks to use something they deem less impactful on the climate. That is where the bigger issue is.
Black Lives Matter leader Patrisse Cullors has demanded a meeting with Joe Biden, asserting that if Biden is elected president he must ‘prioritize’ the BLM agenda.
0
Black Lives Matter leader Patrisse Cullors has demanded a meeting with Joe Biden, asserting that if Biden is elected president he must ‘prioritize’ the BLM agenda.
Black Lives Matter leader Patrisse Cullors has demanded a meeting with Joe Biden, asserting that if Biden is elected president he must ‘prioritize’ the BLM agenda.
I'd tell Patrisse to eat a dick. No, wait... I'd humor her. I'd ask, "What exactly is the BLM agenda? Do they have one? Oversight? Reform? What is their/her plan exactly?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Black Lives Matter leader Patrisse Cullors has demanded a meeting with Joe Biden, asserting that if Biden is elected president he must ‘prioritize’ the BLM agenda.
I'd tell Patrisse to eat a dick. No, wait... I'd humor her. I'd ask, "What exactly is the BLM agenda? Do they have one? Oversight? Reform? What is their/her plan exactly?
“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.”
0
“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.”
“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.”
Where is that report coming from? Is is coming from Dominion or someone with actual knowledge of their software and the data? Or is it coming from an outside tech expert saying, "This is what we think happened."?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
1
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.”
Where is that report coming from? Is is coming from Dominion or someone with actual knowledge of their software and the data? Or is it coming from an outside tech expert saying, "This is what we think happened."?
The Report is coming from Breitbart and One America News Network. Hmmmmmm. I think anyone with half of a brain and common sense knows this is untrue. The mistakes made in PA by the system were caught and corrected within hours. This is how Fake News and conspiracy spreads.
Welcome to 2020.
1
From Twitter: "This claim has been disputed"
The Report is coming from Breitbart and One America News Network. Hmmmmmm. I think anyone with half of a brain and common sense knows this is untrue. The mistakes made in PA by the system were caught and corrected within hours. This is how Fake News and conspiracy spreads.
In a sworn affidavit, an election worker in Clark County, Nevada, claims mail-in ballots were improperly filled out in a Biden-Harris van outside a polling place.
0
In a sworn affidavit, an election worker in Clark County, Nevada, claims mail-in ballots were improperly filled out in a Biden-Harris van outside a polling place.
In a sworn affidavit, an election worker in Clark County, Nevada, claims mail-in ballots were improperly filled out in a Biden-Harris van outside a polling place.
The Iraqi info minister has spoken again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
In a sworn affidavit, an election worker in Clark County, Nevada, claims mail-in ballots were improperly filled out in a Biden-Harris van outside a polling place.
NEW: A Pennsylvania court ruled in favor of the Trump campaign, ordering that the commonwealth may not count ballots where the voters needed to provide proof of identification and failed to do so by Nov. 9.
0
NEW: A Pennsylvania court ruled in favor of the Trump campaign, ordering that the commonwealth may not count ballots where the voters needed to provide proof of identification and failed to do so by Nov. 9.
“Trump’s decapitation strike on the Pentagon this week is raising fears that the U.S. will accelerate the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, putting newly installed leaders on a collision course with top generals and others”
“Trump’s decapitation strike on the Pentagon this week is raising fears that the U.S. will accelerate the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, putting newly installed leaders on a collision course with top generals and others”
Evidence is mounting that election interference has occurred. The left here thinks Trump is spending his days alternating between twiddling his dilly and playing golf, but in reality he is building a very talented team that is working at uncovering election interference. Anyone with a brain now understands that the left attempted and failed to change the result in 2016, so why wouldn't they try again?
General Thomas McInerney has a team working on this and has expressed extreme confidence that the Supreme Court will not dismiss the evidence. Human testimony is not all that is going to be presented.
Meanwhile, betting shops all over the world are seeing Trump's odds at remaining President tick higher.
To the blind mice on the left....check out your gambling sites.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
@I_Need_A_Detox
Evidence is mounting that election interference has occurred. The left here thinks Trump is spending his days alternating between twiddling his dilly and playing golf, but in reality he is building a very talented team that is working at uncovering election interference. Anyone with a brain now understands that the left attempted and failed to change the result in 2016, so why wouldn't they try again?
General Thomas McInerney has a team working on this and has expressed extreme confidence that the Supreme Court will not dismiss the evidence. Human testimony is not all that is going to be presented.
Meanwhile, betting shops all over the world are seeing Trump's odds at remaining President tick higher.
To the blind mice on the left....check out your gambling sites.
Secondly global reputable sportsbooks are no longer taking 2020 Presidential election bets considering the election is over. Stop Rambling about nothing in your parallel universe.
4
Secondly global reputable sportsbooks are no longer taking 2020 Presidential election bets considering the election is over. Stop Rambling about nothing in your parallel universe.
@ Deezy. Are you so inept that you can't even find gambling odds? I guess the left really does need everything in life handed to them on a silver platter.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
@ Deezy. Are you so inept that you can't even find gambling odds? I guess the left really does need everything in life handed to them on a silver platter.
@ Deezy. Are you so inept that you can't even find gambling odds? I guess the left really does need everything in life handed to them on a silver platter.
I repeat. Zero credibility.
What books do you use Ramble? Let's see.
Send a link to one of your books and their current 2020 Presidential election odds.
I'll wait.
4
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
@ Deezy. Are you so inept that you can't even find gambling odds? I guess the left really does need everything in life handed to them on a silver platter.
I repeat. Zero credibility.
What books do you use Ramble? Let's see.
Send a link to one of your books and their current 2020 Presidential election odds.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
