All Forums | Penalty Box

FADE SCAL

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5750
Posts: 73
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 10153
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by njsupreme1:

Cmon Mods....Where are you???  Something is really wrong when the 11 year olds start to run the site. Do your jobs!

This moron is contributing nothing to Covers. She is obviously angry because she has internal issues.

Fine work NJS.....................................

INDEED......just like some neurotic chick that just got dumped.......

I say pity this man (she-male)....... Covers !
   * show some compassion boys wtf..... 

Little Rickey is essentially......a dude that has PERIODS....
   * imagine the horror if you will.....
.
Serious hormonal disturbances.....have led no down this precarious road.....of dark alleys....rest stop toilets.........etc.....

CORRECTING other DUDES.... (online).... as his primary focus?....really not that big of a deal right? ......I mean.....whaddya expect?

 * hell.....most of us are used to this type of NAGGING / BITCHING anyway....counting beers.....not stacking the dishwasher right.....watching a little TOO much CFB ?...... 

Support the poor basterd Covers.....help him win some cash......get that T- therapy he so desperately needs.....OR the surgeries to  make him / it............complete.................  


 
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 2754
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by Rickey:


how am I the bad guy here?  SCAL has a less than .500 record, and is giving advice out to people who are putting real money on his plays, which are not hitting most of the time. I call him out for his lack of accuracy and I'm being amateur, disrespectful, and in accurate in my picks?  Ok, I guess I'll just take a back seat if Covers and SCAL are in collusion together.  



How can you be this stupid??? Do you really think you are providing a service here??  You do understand this is a FREE site which means all picks, opinions, even your BS, everything is FREE which means it really isn't necessary to call anyone out for a losing pick.  What do you think you are trying to save us from?? What is your axe to grind with Scal anyway?? Did he steal your milk money from you in Jr High?? Did he bang your wife?? GIVE US A GOOD REASON....CAN YOU??  If you can't give us a reason, please stop cluttering up the site with your ramblings.  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20838
Posted: #28
I'm gonna just pile on...You're a hater. Scal and I have had well documented back and forths in the other forums but this is sports. More thsn that, this is football. To most of us it's our handicapping bread and butter. I'd never hate on the man, or any covers bros for that matter. We're all here to win. If you think you can cap then knuck if you buck. Personally I believe that if you can't make your own picks you shouldn't be betting. If you can't cap then tail...or fade. That's your prerogative but do it in private. Making threads like this just tells everyone you're a loser and a hater. Scal may lose some bets, nobody's perfect, but at least he gives you his analysis so you can decide whether you agree or disagree before you tail. Like I said, I never tail the man. I never tail anyone. And Scal and I have had some epic arguments but when it's all said and done i'm still wishing the brother well this season.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 499
Posted: #29
well I guess we now know who won the Covers A-hole award.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 222
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by Rickey:

BTW, I put money on Boise State based on SCAL's analysis last year, and lost.  

To say I'm a little bit chapped is an understatement..

hope the truth makes you feel better.

wow you quote one play...who gives a crap about your ONE play. SCAL loses like everyone and also wins like some. i can assure you SCAL or anybody else who is in this for the long run doesn't care about ONE play, let alone YOUR one play.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 222
Posted: #31
further, have you checked SCAL's record from last calendar year?...if not you should and see he was very profitable so why would you FADE him? i guess bc your like most who are not patient. this is a marathon and not for the weak. i'm sorry you couldnt get rich in a months time period. SCAL like all others are judged over the long run and not over a day, week or month(s).  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by Covers-Team:


Hello,

Although this may be true, it is amateur, distasteful, and honestly just shows how bad of a handicapper you must be.

Enjoy your time while it lasts here.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by Covers-Team:


Hello,

Although this may be true, it is amateur, distasteful, and honestly just shows how bad of a handicapper you must be.

Enjoy your time while it lasts here.


Ah, so THAT's why you bumped that thread. It lost. I try to win every game. If you fade me this year you will pay Dearly kid.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2734
Posted: #34
Rickey got checked real quick lol

Stay in your lane little boy.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by Rickey:

FADE SCAL's picks to win:
  • SCAL HAS Utah State +29 over Wisconsin (TAKE WISCONSIN -28.5 TO WIN)
  • SCAL HAS Rutgers +30.5 over Washington (TAKE WASHINGTON -27.5 TO WIN)
  • SCAL HAS MSU -17 over Bowling Green (TAKE MICHIGAN STATE -17 TO WIN)
ALL WINNERS BECAUSE I LIKE YOU!!!



So you're tailing his MSU play?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by njsupreme1:

Cmon Mods....Where are you???  Something is really wrong when the 11 year olds start to run the site. Do your jobs!

This moron is contributing nothing to Covers. She is obviously angry because she has internal issues.

You should see the baseball forum brotha. They are everywhere. 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 669
Posted: #37
Ricky, it does not matter what Scal post. You are responsible for your bets. If you win or lose it is on you and nobody else. Stop trying to blame your loses on someone else.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 548
Posted: #38
GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2017
Posts: 1400
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:



41% in 2006
37% in 2007
40% in 2008
32% in 2009
44% in 2010
41% in 2011
38% in 2012
35% in 2013
37% in 2014

All documented Scal plays on covers...use these historical numbers as you wish...fading is indeed an option...although 2015 and 2016 he did a little better.

Fade or follow, atleast know the facts 



And, What's your point ???? Aren't you 25% this year in tennis ? You are fade material too 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 3267
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:



41% in 2006
37% in 2007
40% in 2008
32% in 2009
44% in 2010
41% in 2011
38% in 2012
35% in 2013
37% in 2014

All documented Scal plays on covers...use these historical numbers as you wish...fading is indeed an option...although 2015 and 2016 he did a little better.

Fade or follow, atleast know the facts 


 If these numbers are accurate that is terrible. These numbers can't be true, i read that he is a 70% capper..

Oh I get it, you add the most recent years winning % with the previous year's and you get into the 70% range.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 24567
Posted: #41
This is a public forum there's 2 things the mods can do about Ricky posting about fading scal nothing and like it 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:



41% in 2006
37% in 2007
40% in 2008
32% in 2009
44% in 2010
41% in 2011
38% in 2012
35% in 2013
37% in 2014

All documented Scal plays on covers...use these historical numbers as you wish...fading is indeed an option...although 2015 and 2016 he did a little better.

Fade or follow, atleast know the facts 


Facts. What a fu**ing joke you are! 
Hugh Jorgan made these up and his lackeys now copy and past them in every thread I'm in.

I love how he EVERY year is SIGNIFICANTLY under 50%. All before the 70% year. How convenient!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by chaloots:


 If these numbers are accurate that is terrible. These numbers can't be true, i read that he is a 70% capper..

Oh I get it, you add the most recent years winning % with the previous year's and you get into the 70% range.

You have no self-respect or common sense.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2
Posted: #44
Not seeing much talk about Michigan- Florida. Anyone curious why the line hasn't made a significant change with all those Florida suspensions?
Pumped the season is here. Best of luck to everyone!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2017
Posts: 14
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by OKNIS:

Not seeing much talk about Michigan- Florida. Anyone curious why the line hasn't made a significant change with all those Florida suspensions?Pumped the season is here. Best of luck to everyone!

I think only 2 of the players that got suspended should make a difference.at least that's wats being reported.most folks still like gators. I think
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2016
Posts: 353
Posted: #46
i was only here last season but he did quite well if i remember correctly.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #47
Caveat Emptor

Buyer beware......................................

Scal uses a psychological angle. Another poster, Summa, uses stats, and nothing but the stats. He focuses on one's he thinks are important. Another guy, weathered, used.............you guessed it, the weather for his picks (mostly if it was going to rain like hell or was F'in cold)

The idea, is to have a take and not suck. Because he's using a psychological angle, Scal provides more than just one, because nobody in their right mind would bet on just "I think they feel this way because" and will give at least four or five reasons why he thinks this way.

It is up to the reader to decide if the weather, stats, etc., are worth betting on.

Myself, I have not a care in the World about hot dogs, WWE, or the New York Knicks, but, college football, now you have my attention.

If you don't like the news, go out and make some of your own
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 10153
Posted: #48
(SOME).....of you knuckleheads are confused as to how this INTERNET thing works..........and WHY it's pretty cool

Unlike REAL life....where you are FORCED to deal with ANNOYING people (family / work / wife ha).....here you don't HAVE to...>> or people that happen to annoy YOU better said

  * WHY then....SEEK OUT....opinions of those you don't agree with / get under your skin?.....IGNORE them you (idiot) wtf man.........


IF.....as a GENERIC White guy..... you don't believe that minorities...esp Black folks...deserve to be treated with (a little) respect.....don't throw that hillbilly crap (" I ain't never had no slaves man....so......") .....in his face


OR....if you IGNORE VALUE....in handicapping / investing........preferring (like most EVERYBODY) here......to see a card with only POPULAR names.....

like:    Apple....Microsoft.....Amazon....AT&T.....Exxon.....>>  then patting the guy on the back for his brilliance............ fine

BUT.....being a hardcore VALUE player.....who seeks UNDER / DE-Valued 'stocks' .....Scalabrine might give you a card like this :

Alibaba....Spok Holdings......Splunk......Regeneron......Aerotech

IF.....you don't (ignorant azz) agree............
   * with this type of investment strategy........why not stay outta his threads?.....hang out with the POPULAR squares / CHUMPS ....there are PLENTY of 'em ya' know.............
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #49
Thanks bookie.

Yes my card will be unconventional to say the least.

So much so, I was on the verge of posting Wagner vs. St. Anselm yesterday but passed.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 326
Posted: #50
Tibbs Jr 
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.