All Forums | Penalty Box

game of the week

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7833
Posts: 72
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 1324
Posted: #51

   I had Research last week as 2-3..

 Won Colordo-SMU

 Lost- Tulane-MTSU-Vandy

 Thats fine with me but I didnt have 2-1... Ive heard hes been solid all yr... Usually like your picks Research

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #52

So far I have:

 

Kansas +7.5 (POW)

Michigan +4.5

Michigan State pk

Oregon State +21

Baylor +10

Illinois +10

Bowling Green +8

Virginia +6

Washington +10

Boston College +8.5

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 6009
Posted: #53
Washington
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1345
Posted: #54
I have to be honest, this late in the year, its nice to see someone backing a lot of dogs.   I really think it's only a matter of time before the pups hit at a 70+% clip one week......

GL. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 6800
Posted: #55
I like it, the jayhawks are a solid home dog
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4016
Posted: #56
Sorry if I came off as a dick, research. It wasn't toward you, but rather the people that can't figure out people's records properly. That being said, I like a lot of your plays! Like stated above, I think the dogs are where the plays are at this time of year. Teams are starting to draw more and more even. I can't believe USC is -21 over Oregon St.






 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 142
Posted: #57

Quote Originally Posted by Ball_Picker:

I hate to bash, but where are you guys getting your info from? research was 2-3 last week in CFB and I do believe his 'big' play was a losing play.


 

you are an idiot.  what are you lookin at.  I bet his 3 big plays on saturday and went 2-1.  Sunday his big play was 1-0. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4016
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by lucky leo:

 

you are an idiot.  what are you lookin at.  I bet his 3 big plays on saturday and went 2-1.  Sunday his big play was 1-0. 



Idiot, huh? HE WENT 2-3!

Why are some of you people so damn stupid? This ring a bell, genius?

Posted: research
got the late confirmation on two more plays...one was expected the other one was not. anyways, as i already said, fade follow or ignore. no writeups. no explanations. i know that 99% of you will hate these plays and disagree strongly with me. but that's ok. i wish you luck anyways. all 5 plays are almost as big as arkansas last week and bigger than uab vs smiss a few weeks ago. haven't lost a big play yet and i will take a 3-2 day tomorrow. everything better than that would be great. once again, stay positive, good luck and good winnings. talk to you sunday in the nfl forum.
 
HUGE PLAYS (FINAL CARD)
 
Middle Tennessee State +4.5
SMU +8
Colorado +10
Tulane +17.5
Vanderbilt +7.5

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 4453
Posted: #59
imwith ya on oregon state large
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4016
Posted: #60
Hmmmm.....my math shows that there are FIVE games there.  Now if he went 2-1 then that would only add up to 3 games, right? So that means there must have been two more games. Oh. There they are!! And it was MTS, Tulane and Vanderbilt that all didn't cover, making them 0-3.....but then we have to add 2 more games to get the total sum of 5. Oh. There they are!! They were winners. So we get 2 winners and 3 losers for last week.

Any questions?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 3006
Posted: #61
why are u such a moron?

he obviously said he bet research's three big plays and went 2-1

did he say he bet all five games? no

got damn


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 3006
Posted: #62
on another note...

gluck research, like msu, mich, wash, ore st, and virgina


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 53
Posted: #63

Take his picks or don't take them. You are going to gamble regardless. He is more than credible and is reputable. Argue all you want or don't follow his site. I use his info when and how I choose.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 120
Posted: #64
Good luck with your picks man!

I haven't looked into the Saturday games, but the one that I disagree with is Illinois.  It's tough thinking that they will finally win ATS after losing their last 9.  But good luck on all the games!


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1345
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by DynastyOne:

why are u such a moron?

he obviously said he bet research's three big plays and went 2-1

did he say he bet all five games? no

got damn




Another covers.com forum heart warming moment.  Thanks for backing research up.  I'm sure he's grateful. 

Regardless, his "record" was 2-3 last week, as shown above.  Just because this lamb decided to only play the big ones, doesnt affect the overall record which was the point of the post. 

out of curiosity, why "moron?" Does it hurt your feelings that much when the record is corrected? Baaaaaaa sheep. Baaaaa. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 3006
Posted: #66
Lol pull ur panties up kiddo

does it make ur box wet that I put your boss in place when he was wrong? thanks for backing ball up. hypocrite.

yes, his record was 2-3. however, that "lamb" clearly said he took researchs big plays and went 2-1. am i arguing that researchs pick isnt 2-3? NO. read the fucking post u idiot


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 559
Posted: #67
Research was 2-3 last week
Research was 2-11 the previous week
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 24
Posted: #68
Great work Research.  The good one always bring out the most haters.  Keep it up!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1345
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by DynastyOne:

Lol pull ur panties up kiddo

does it make ur box wet that I put your boss in place when he was wrong? thanks for backing ball up. hypocrite.

yes, his record was 2-3. however, that "lamb" clearly said he took researchs big plays and went 2-1. am i arguing that researchs pick isnt 2-3? NO. read the fucking post u idiot



Who the fuck is my boss? And I wasn't backing up anyone? I was simply pointing out that you are in someone else's thread defending his honor, and arguing the wrong thing.  Just because one nobody happened to pull the two straws that were winners, doesnt change the fact that the blow-hard you are touting was 2-3 last week. 

 First off, this thread is full of 1-20 post sheep blindly tailing. 
Second, why do you feel the need to be so tough in your posts? Yea, I'm a fucking idiot.  I guess it doesn't matter that I went to the University of Illinois on a 4 year scholarship? Of course not, because I'm sure you'll fire back with you don't believe it.  Fuck gambling on sports - how about we take an IQ test and put 100K on it big shot?  The world is filled with forum and internet tough asses.  Youre the same kid that got his ass whooped all through high school - and most likely still a virgin.  Keep tailing beat-off.  I'm sure you're worth a  fortune.  


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1345
Posted: #70
Im sorry if I am responsible for getting this thread moved.  I will no longer post in your thread's research.  Your band of sheep irritate the hell out of me.  I am sorry, and I will leave you to your picks form here out. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 407
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by Ball_Picker:

Sorry if I came off as a dick, research. It wasn't toward you, but rather the people that can't figure out people's records properly. That being said, I like a lot of your plays! Like stated above, I think the dogs are where the plays are at this time of year. Teams are starting to draw more and more even. I can't believe USC is -21 over Oregon St.








I was just going off the three plays he posted last week as his big three college plays. SMU, COL, MTST. 2-1.
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 27762
Posted: #72
and we're in the p box
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.