Posted:
#51
I had Research last week as 2-3..
Won Colordo-SMU
Lost- Tulane-MTSU-Vandy
Thats fine with me but I didnt have 2-1... Ive heard hes been solid all yr... Usually like your picks Research
0
game of the week
Posted:
#56
Sorry if I came off as a dick, research. It wasn't toward you, but rather the people that can't figure out people's records properly. That being said, I like a lot of your plays! Like stated above, I think the dogs are where the plays are at this time of year. Teams are starting to draw more and more even. I can't believe USC is -21 over Oregon St.
0
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by Ball_Picker:
I hate to bash, but where are you guys getting your info from? research was 2-3 last week in CFB and I do believe his 'big' play was a losing play.
I hate to bash, but where are you guys getting your info from? research was 2-3 last week in CFB and I do believe his 'big' play was a losing play.
you are an idiot. what are you lookin at. I bet his 3 big plays on saturday and went 2-1. Sunday his big play was 1-0.
0
Posted:
#58
Quote Originally Posted by lucky leo:
you are an idiot. what are you lookin at. I bet his 3 big plays on saturday and went 2-1. Sunday his big play was 1-0.
Idiot, huh? HE WENT 2-3!
Why are some of you people so damn stupid? This ring a bell, genius?
Posted: research
got the late confirmation on two more plays...one was expected the
other one was not. anyways, as i already said, fade follow or ignore.
no writeups. no explanations. i know that 99% of you will hate these
plays and disagree strongly with me. but that's ok. i wish you luck
anyways. all 5 plays are almost as big as arkansas last week and bigger
than uab vs smiss a few weeks ago. haven't lost a big play yet and i
will take a 3-2 day tomorrow. everything better than that would be
great. once again, stay positive, good luck and good winnings. talk to
you sunday in the nfl forum.
HUGE PLAYS (FINAL CARD)
Middle Tennessee State +4.5
SMU +8
Colorado +10
Tulane +17.5
Vanderbilt +7.5
0
Posted:
#60
Hmmmm.....my math shows that there are FIVE games there. Now if he went 2-1 then that would only add up to 3 games, right? So that means there must have been two more games. Oh. There they are!! And it was MTS, Tulane and Vanderbilt that all didn't cover, making them 0-3.....but then we have to add 2 more games to get the total sum of 5. Oh. There they are!! They were winners. So we get 2 winners and 3 losers for last week.
Any questions?
Any questions?
0
Posted:
#65
Quote Originally Posted by DynastyOne:
why are u such a moron?
why are u such a moron?
he obviously said he bet research's three big plays and went 2-1
did he say he bet all five games? no
got damn
Another covers.com forum heart warming moment. Thanks for backing research up. I'm sure he's grateful.
Regardless, his "record" was 2-3 last week, as shown above. Just because this lamb decided to only play the big ones, doesnt affect the overall record which was the point of the post.
out of curiosity, why "moron?" Does it hurt your feelings that much when the record is corrected? Baaaaaaa sheep. Baaaaa.
0
Posted:
#66
Lol pull ur panties up kiddo
does it make ur box wet that I put your boss in place when he was wrong? thanks for backing ball up. hypocrite.
yes, his record was 2-3. however, that "lamb" clearly said he took researchs big plays and went 2-1. am i arguing that researchs pick isnt 2-3? NO. read the fucking post u idiot
0
Posted:
#69
Quote Originally Posted by DynastyOne:
Lol pull ur panties up kiddo
Lol pull ur panties up kiddo
does it make ur box wet that I put your boss in place when he was wrong? thanks for backing ball up. hypocrite.
yes, his record was 2-3. however, that "lamb" clearly said he took researchs big plays and went 2-1. am i arguing that researchs pick isnt 2-3? NO. read the fucking post u idiot
Who the fuck is my boss? And I wasn't backing up anyone? I was simply pointing out that you are in someone else's thread defending his honor, and arguing the wrong thing. Just because one nobody happened to pull the two straws that were winners, doesnt change the fact that the blow-hard you are touting was 2-3 last week.
First off, this thread is full of 1-20 post sheep blindly tailing.
Second, why do you feel the need to be so tough in your posts? Yea, I'm a fucking idiot. I guess it doesn't matter that I went to the University of Illinois on a 4 year scholarship? Of course not, because I'm sure you'll fire back with you don't believe it. Fuck gambling on sports - how about we take an IQ test and put 100K on it big shot? The world is filled with forum and internet tough asses. Youre the same kid that got his ass whooped all through high school - and most likely still a virgin. Keep tailing beat-off. I'm sure you're worth a fortune.
0
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by Ball_Picker:
Sorry if I came off as a dick, research. It wasn't toward you, but rather the people that can't figure out people's records properly. That being said, I like a lot of your plays! Like stated above, I think the dogs are where the plays are at this time of year. Teams are starting to draw more and more even. I can't believe USC is -21 over Oregon St.
Sorry if I came off as a dick, research. It wasn't toward you, but rather the people that can't figure out people's records properly. That being said, I like a lot of your plays! Like stated above, I think the dogs are where the plays are at this time of year. Teams are starting to draw more and more even. I can't believe USC is -21 over Oregon St.
I was just going off the three plays he posted last week as his big three college plays. SMU, COL, MTST. 2-1.
0
Hot Forum Topics
