2
1
8
0
2
1
3
0
6
2
1
3
5
4
1
7
0
0
5
6
5
2
Giants are literally averaging 2.91 runs per game this month. You better PRAY that Vogelsong doesn't have a bad outing, because if he does, you are gonna be up a creek.
It's all in his posts. He started off with a huge losing streak.
It's all in his posts. He started off with a huge losing streak.
I should be banned for winning......
In the long run u will lose like that......I guess nobody loses betting small lines?
Stop embarrassing yourselves !!!!
The joke is on most of you....with your constant constant losing.
This isn't the point num nuts. The point EVERYONE is trying to make to you is that you'll NEVER be profitable playing these types of lines long term. If you're playing small lines as you put it, you can be profitable with a 50%ish record or even a 45% record depending if you're playing small favs or dogs. Playing the kind of lines you do you'll have to hit 85% or better to be profitable. And long term that will NOT happen. Maybe a short term 10-2 run or 12-2 run but over a season you'll be writing on cardboard begging for food.
But I'm sure you'll have something to say about this too and it's wasting my time typing this, but at least now someone spelled it out for you in terms maybe you can understand.
I should be banned for winning......
In the long run u will lose like that......I guess nobody loses betting small lines?
Stop embarrassing yourselves !!!!
The joke is on most of you....with your constant constant losing.
This isn't the point num nuts. The point EVERYONE is trying to make to you is that you'll NEVER be profitable playing these types of lines long term. If you're playing small lines as you put it, you can be profitable with a 50%ish record or even a 45% record depending if you're playing small favs or dogs. Playing the kind of lines you do you'll have to hit 85% or better to be profitable. And long term that will NOT happen. Maybe a short term 10-2 run or 12-2 run but over a season you'll be writing on cardboard begging for food.
But I'm sure you'll have something to say about this too and it's wasting my time typing this, but at least now someone spelled it out for you in terms maybe you can understand.
you could take Houston -1.5, lay $57 (6% of your original wager) to win the same profit. Still somewhat ill-advised, but much MUCH more sane than your plan. probably healthier too.
you could take Houston -1.5, lay $57 (6% of your original wager) to win the same profit. Still somewhat ill-advised, but much MUCH more sane than your plan. probably healthier too.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.