Well, as usual I am back. KInda wondering, how is it that a personal can be placed back in the penalty box for making innocent statements such as "I have a winning system and if it goes 13-0 I may market the system.
Accusation was made by the costopol that I wass selling my system, and we al know that is against Covers Policy, especially when I believe Covers is now owned by Bet Jamica, maybe they were scared. Don't know, But the end results is I am here again.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Well, as usual I am back. KInda wondering, how is it that a personal can be placed back in the penalty box for making innocent statements such as "I have a winning system and if it goes 13-0 I may market the system.
Accusation was made by the costopol that I wass selling my system, and we al know that is against Covers Policy, especially when I believe Covers is now owned by Bet Jamica, maybe they were scared. Don't know, But the end results is I am here again.
Well, as usual I am back. KInda wondering, how is it that a personal can be placed back in the penalty box for making innocent statements such as "I have a winning system and if it goes 13-0 I may market the system.
Accusation was made by the costopol that I wass selling my system, and we al know that is against Covers Policy, especially when I believe Covers is now owned by Bet Jamica, maybe they were scared. Don't know, But the end results is I am here again.
Bet Jamica does it again
0
Quote Originally Posted by DWest35:
Well, as usual I am back. KInda wondering, how is it that a personal can be placed back in the penalty box for making innocent statements such as "I have a winning system and if it goes 13-0 I may market the system.
Accusation was made by the costopol that I wass selling my system, and we al know that is against Covers Policy, especially when I believe Covers is now owned by Bet Jamica, maybe they were scared. Don't know, But the end results is I am here again.
I did and when I hit like 13 in a row correct using my system, I made the fatal mistake of stating that if this system hit 15 in a row that maybe I should market the system. I never indicated t no one that I wuld sell it to them, Just a statement, and Weeble saw it fit that I violated the frum rules
0
Quote Originally Posted by 5_for_Fighting:
so why not just post the play?
I did and when I hit like 13 in a row correct using my system, I made the fatal mistake of stating that if this system hit 15 in a row that maybe I should market the system. I never indicated t no one that I wuld sell it to them, Just a statement, and Weeble saw it fit that I violated the frum rules
This is very true, that is why when they have an individual who is successful in there lays, that it always seems that they end up in the Penalty Box or even banned frm the site.
Think about this...lets say ou have a cappers who truly is good, and he continues to post his plays in the forum, and ALOT of members follow those plays and wager On them....How much money would you think that the Bookie would loose as a result of this? ALOT alot ALOT. So if Betjamica owns Covers now, What does it add up to you?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dude_Abides:
Bet Jamica does it again
This is very true, that is why when they have an individual who is successful in there lays, that it always seems that they end up in the Penalty Box or even banned frm the site.
Think about this...lets say ou have a cappers who truly is good, and he continues to post his plays in the forum, and ALOT of members follow those plays and wager On them....How much money would you think that the Bookie would loose as a result of this? ALOT alot ALOT. So if Betjamica owns Covers now, What does it add up to you?
This is very true, that is why when they have an individual who is successful in there lays, that it always seems that they end up in the Penalty Box or even banned frm the site.
Think about this...lets say ou have a cappers who truly is good, and he continues to post his plays in the forum, and ALOT of members follow those plays and wager On them....How much money would you think that the Bookie would loose as a result of this? ALOT alot ALOT. So if Betjamica owns Covers now, What does it add up to you?
"I'd like to buy a vowel, Pat. I would like to buy an 'A'."
0
Quote Originally Posted by DWest35:
This is very true, that is why when they have an individual who is successful in there lays, that it always seems that they end up in the Penalty Box or even banned frm the site.
Think about this...lets say ou have a cappers who truly is good, and he continues to post his plays in the forum, and ALOT of members follow those plays and wager On them....How much money would you think that the Bookie would loose as a result of this? ALOT alot ALOT. So if Betjamica owns Covers now, What does it add up to you?
"I'd like to buy a vowel, Pat. I would like to buy an 'A'."
Yes....NOTHING....I am curious of one thing, and that is "Does the Covers Lineman....Get a Discount from there Employers? (BetJamica????????), and if so, maybe instead of us posting our plays, we can join Covers as employeess, and make some money from them?
0
Quote Originally Posted by starwink:
The German costopol has nothing on these guys.
Yes....NOTHING....I am curious of one thing, and that is "Does the Covers Lineman....Get a Discount from there Employers? (BetJamica????????), and if so, maybe instead of us posting our plays, we can join Covers as employeess, and make some money from them?
Well, as usual I am back. KInda wondering, how is it that a personal can be placed back in the penalty box for making innocent statements such as "I have a winning system and if it goes 13-0 I may market the system.
Accusation was made by the costopol that I wass selling my system, and we al know that is against Covers Policy, especially when I believe Covers is now owned by Bet Jamica, maybe they were scared. Don't know, But the end results is I am here again.
You made your intentions clear. Our site is not a place to do personal business. Please hone up on the manifesto.
Incidentally, your BetJam conspiracy theory is a new one to me. Nice work.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DWest35:
Well, as usual I am back. KInda wondering, how is it that a personal can be placed back in the penalty box for making innocent statements such as "I have a winning system and if it goes 13-0 I may market the system.
Accusation was made by the costopol that I wass selling my system, and we al know that is against Covers Policy, especially when I believe Covers is now owned by Bet Jamica, maybe they were scared. Don't know, But the end results is I am here again.
You made your intentions clear. Our site is not a place to do personal business. Please hone up on the manifesto.
Incidentally, your BetJam conspiracy theory is a new one to me. Nice work.
You made your intentions clear. Our site is not a place to do personal business. Please hone up on the manifesto.
Incidentally, your BetJam conspiracy theory is a new one to me. Nice work.
I find this rather hard to believe Weebs, that you are not aware of the Bet Jam agenda. You always appear to be one of the more in the know Costopols here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
You made your intentions clear. Our site is not a place to do personal business. Please hone up on the manifesto.
Incidentally, your BetJam conspiracy theory is a new one to me. Nice work.
I find this rather hard to believe Weebs, that you are not aware of the Bet Jam agenda. You always appear to be one of the more in the know Costopols here.
You made your intentions clear. Our site is not a place to do personal business. Please hone up on the manifesto.
Incidentally, your BetJam conspiracy theory is a new one to me. Nice work.
Weeble you know as well as I do that in my thread...no where in it did I offer to sell the product to anyone. I merely made a statement, and you put me here. Is that fair? If I am in the wrong for that then I apologize
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
You made your intentions clear. Our site is not a place to do personal business. Please hone up on the manifesto.
Incidentally, your BetJam conspiracy theory is a new one to me. Nice work.
Weeble you know as well as I do that in my thread...no where in it did I offer to sell the product to anyone. I merely made a statement, and you put me here. Is that fair? If I am in the wrong for that then I apologize
A market system is any systematic process enabling many market players to bid and ask: helping bidders and sellers interact and make deals. It is not just the price mechanism but the entire system of regulation, qualification, credentials, reputations and clearing that surrounds that mechanism and makes it operate in a social context.[1]
Because a market system relies on the assumption that players are constantly involved and unequally enabled, a market system is distinguished specifically from a voting system where candidates seek the support of voters on a less regular basis. However, the interactions between market and voting systems are an important aspect of political economy, and some argue they are hard to differentiate, e.g. systems like cumulative voting and runoff voting involve a degree of market-like bargaining and tradeoff, rather than simple statements of choice.
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
What the fuck does marketing your system imply then....it is obvious without stating the obvious isn't it....
A market system is any systematic process enabling many market players to bid and ask: helping bidders and sellers interact and make deals. It is not just the price mechanism but the entire system of regulation, qualification, credentials, reputations and clearing that surrounds that mechanism and makes it operate in a social context.[1]
Because a market system relies on the assumption that players are constantly involved and unequally enabled, a market system is distinguished specifically from a voting system where candidates seek the support of voters on a less regular basis. However, the interactions between market and voting systems are an important aspect of political economy, and some argue they are hard to differentiate, e.g. systems like cumulative voting and runoff voting involve a degree of market-like bargaining and tradeoff, rather than simple statements of choice.
Hey DouchebagWest, I viewed one of your more recent threads, and you are obviously misleading when it comes to keeping your record. You post plays which lost and dont count them, then you start over with a "new system" and forget all about your losing record. New system starts at 3-0, and you have the balls to say that you are then 18-5.
Hey DouchebagWest, I viewed one of your more recent threads, and you are obviously misleading when it comes to keeping your record. You post plays which lost and dont count them, then you start over with a "new system" and forget all about your losing record. New system starts at 3-0, and you have the balls to say that you are then 18-5.
Weeble you know as well as I do that in my thread...no where in it did I offer to sell the product to anyone. I merely made a statement, and you put me here. Is that fair? If I am in the wrong for that then I apologize
I don't know how else to word it. You said you were going to market your system. To me, that's telling people that you're intending to sell, which is against Covers rules.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DWest35:
Weeble you know as well as I do that in my thread...no where in it did I offer to sell the product to anyone. I merely made a statement, and you put me here. Is that fair? If I am in the wrong for that then I apologize
I don't know how else to word it. You said you were going to market your system. To me, that's telling people that you're intending to sell, which is against Covers rules.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.