Enjoy your investment, everyone here on covers are lost dogs. Most of the posts I read on here is straight BS. If you don't know what your talking about don't release bad plays to the public. It's brutal for all my friends who took RAPS.
0
Enjoy your investment, everyone here on covers are lost dogs. Most of the posts I read on here is straight BS. If you don't know what your talking about don't release bad plays to the public. It's brutal for all my friends who took RAPS.
Enjoy your investment, everyone here on covers are lost dogs. Most of the posts I read on here is straight BS. If you don't know what your talking about don't release bad plays to the public. It's brutal for all my friends who took RAPS.
You are the best bro
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRUONGxHUYNH:
Enjoy your investment, everyone here on covers are lost dogs. Most of the posts I read on here is straight BS. If you don't know what your talking about don't release bad plays to the public. It's brutal for all my friends who took RAPS.
I'll give everyone my official record. Believe me or not.
PLAYOFFS 2017 RECORD : 21 - 2.
All plays are sent & most is posted.
In post #39 you claim to be 16-2
In your post to which I am replying you are 21-2.
Am I to assume that the discrepancy is that you are sending out picks via a system that is not Covers forums, and those picks are being sent to a list of people that you have complied from this site?
The reason that I ask is because there is one record on this site which is much better than yours. Matter of fact it is hitting at 100%. That record is that absolutely every poster who wins some games, and then attempts to send (eventually sell) their picks through a different means, ends up losing most of their games, and most of their clients money.
I'm telling you this is hitting at 100%.
Lastly, Truong, can you explain to me the theory of regression to the mean?
How about sustainable winning percentages?
I'm not hating, just pointing out what is so obvious to those of us who have been around.
Good luck
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRUONGxHUYNH:
I'll give everyone my official record. Believe me or not.
PLAYOFFS 2017 RECORD : 21 - 2.
All plays are sent & most is posted.
In post #39 you claim to be 16-2
In your post to which I am replying you are 21-2.
Am I to assume that the discrepancy is that you are sending out picks via a system that is not Covers forums, and those picks are being sent to a list of people that you have complied from this site?
The reason that I ask is because there is one record on this site which is much better than yours. Matter of fact it is hitting at 100%. That record is that absolutely every poster who wins some games, and then attempts to send (eventually sell) their picks through a different means, ends up losing most of their games, and most of their clients money.
I'm telling you this is hitting at 100%.
Lastly, Truong, can you explain to me the theory of regression to the mean?
How about sustainable winning percentages?
I'm not hating, just pointing out what is so obvious to those of us who have been around.
Am I to assume that the discrepancy is that you are sending out picks via a system that is not Covers forums, and those picks are being sent to a list of people that you have complied from this site?
The reason that I ask is because there is one record on this site which is much better than yours. Matter of fact it is hitting at 100%. That record is that absolutely every poster who wins some games, and then attempts to send (eventually sell) their picks through a different means, ends up losing most of their games, and most of their clients money.
I'm telling you this is hitting at 100%.
Lastly, Truong, can you explain to me the theory of regression to the mean?
How about sustainable winning percentages?
I'm not hating, just pointing out what is so obvious to those of us who have been around.
Good luck
you courting some new friends.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
In post #39 you claim to be 16-2
In your post to which I am replying you are 21-2.
Am I to assume that the discrepancy is that you are sending out picks via a system that is not Covers forums, and those picks are being sent to a list of people that you have complied from this site?
The reason that I ask is because there is one record on this site which is much better than yours. Matter of fact it is hitting at 100%. That record is that absolutely every poster who wins some games, and then attempts to send (eventually sell) their picks through a different means, ends up losing most of their games, and most of their clients money.
I'm telling you this is hitting at 100%.
Lastly, Truong, can you explain to me the theory of regression to the mean?
How about sustainable winning percentages?
I'm not hating, just pointing out what is so obvious to those of us who have been around.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.