ECU might be seeing a lower total bc of FAU being on nat'l tv and struggling vs Miami on offense. BUT, they should have an easier time vs a putrid ECU defense. Each team should have 450+ yds and ill bet 8 TD's are scored at minimum. 42-22 ECU rolls but FAU competes.
BTW. ECU is my la tech from LY. Just blindly bet the over, good will come to you.
0
ECU might be seeing a lower total bc of FAU being on nat'l tv and struggling vs Miami on offense. BUT, they should have an easier time vs a putrid ECU defense. Each team should have 450+ yds and ill bet 8 TD's are scored at minimum. 42-22 ECU rolls but FAU competes.
BTW. ECU is my la tech from LY. Just blindly bet the over, good will come to you.
This was on his website: Guys, I'll tell you. I can't wrap my mind around how to play the 20-20.5 points on this game. There's too much to think through following week 1. FAU got slapped by Miami - who I think is probably pretty talented this year. I saw the FAU receivers drop a few passes that I think would have probably resulted in 6. Also, on defense, it wasn't like FAU didn't have the talent to be on the field with Miami. Schematically, they were in the wrong places, coming out of their lanes on defense, missing assignments - but those are correctable mistakes. FAU has some talent and they'll be rotating QB's again tonight.
ECU on the other hand played ODU. ODU marched up and down the field on the Pirates. The defense was horrible on both sides. I don't know what to think of this Pirate team.
So for those reasons, I'm not touching the line on this game. I WILL, however, be playing the OVER 54.5. ECU is going to put up points this year. The offense, I think, is really that good. At home over the past 2 games, ECU QB Shane Carden has been a machine (Marshall/ODU) - going 84-of-101 (83.2%) for nearly 900 yards and 8 TDs. This kid is really rolling in this offense, he's a gamer. I'm expecting him to come out swinging on national TV tonight against these Owls.
Then you've got the ECU defense. I think they're bad. I want to say that ODU's QB is the second coming of Joe Flacco, but I really just think the Pirates are weak on that side of the football. They were not able to get any pressure on the QB last week and they were going up against an FCS level recruited offensive line. I think that kid from ODU threw for about 400 yards or something absurd - I don't care to look it up. What I do know is that they punted like twice and that wasn't until the 4th quarter.
Until ECU can show me that they can stop someone on defense, the OVER is going to be a play for me.
Let's roll with the OVER 54.5 tonight.
0
This was on his website: Guys, I'll tell you. I can't wrap my mind around how to play the 20-20.5 points on this game. There's too much to think through following week 1. FAU got slapped by Miami - who I think is probably pretty talented this year. I saw the FAU receivers drop a few passes that I think would have probably resulted in 6. Also, on defense, it wasn't like FAU didn't have the talent to be on the field with Miami. Schematically, they were in the wrong places, coming out of their lanes on defense, missing assignments - but those are correctable mistakes. FAU has some talent and they'll be rotating QB's again tonight.
ECU on the other hand played ODU. ODU marched up and down the field on the Pirates. The defense was horrible on both sides. I don't know what to think of this Pirate team.
So for those reasons, I'm not touching the line on this game. I WILL, however, be playing the OVER 54.5. ECU is going to put up points this year. The offense, I think, is really that good. At home over the past 2 games, ECU QB Shane Carden has been a machine (Marshall/ODU) - going 84-of-101 (83.2%) for nearly 900 yards and 8 TDs. This kid is really rolling in this offense, he's a gamer. I'm expecting him to come out swinging on national TV tonight against these Owls.
Then you've got the ECU defense. I think they're bad. I want to say that ODU's QB is the second coming of Joe Flacco, but I really just think the Pirates are weak on that side of the football. They were not able to get any pressure on the QB last week and they were going up against an FCS level recruited offensive line. I think that kid from ODU threw for about 400 yards or something absurd - I don't care to look it up. What I do know is that they punted like twice and that wasn't until the 4th quarter.
Until ECU can show me that they can stop someone on defense, the OVER is going to be a play for me.
Jdn, I like your card but can you help me understand the wake forest play? I looked into the game and tried to find an edge either way. Wake has a good quarterback in Price and campanaro will be back for the game, but I'm obviously missing something. Care to enlighten me?
0
Jdn, I like your card but can you help me understand the wake forest play? I looked into the game and tried to find an edge either way. Wake has a good quarterback in Price and campanaro will be back for the game, but I'm obviously missing something. Care to enlighten me?
ECU might be seeing a lower total bc of FAU being on nat'l tv and struggling vs Miami on offense. BUT, they should have an easier time vs a putrid ECU defense. Each team should have 450+ yds and ill bet 8 TD's are scored at minimum. 42-22 ECU rolls but FAU competes.
BTW. ECU is my la tech from LY. Just blindly bet the over, good will come to you.
Thanks for the heads up on LA Tech
0
Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:
ECU might be seeing a lower total bc of FAU being on nat'l tv and struggling vs Miami on offense. BUT, they should have an easier time vs a putrid ECU defense. Each team should have 450+ yds and ill bet 8 TD's are scored at minimum. 42-22 ECU rolls but FAU competes.
BTW. ECU is my la tech from LY. Just blindly bet the over, good will come to you.
Not doubting you, but where were you able to find a line of Wyoming -20?
Dude, seriously, read the fkn thread. You're about the 12th person to come in here with this when the answer is provided 39324959465936596 times already.
0
Quote Originally Posted by walbanger:
Not doubting you, but where were you able to find a line of Wyoming -20?
Dude, seriously, read the fkn thread. You're about the 12th person to come in here with this when the answer is provided 39324959465936596 times already.
Dude, seriously, read the fkn thread. You're about the 12th person to come in here with this when the answer is provided 39324959465936596 times already.
No need be rude. I asked a simple question and didn't think an answer would be an issue. This thread has 8 pages and I don't know where it was stated where the line came from
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoonBoy:
Dude, seriously, read the fkn thread. You're about the 12th person to come in here with this when the answer is provided 39324959465936596 times already.
No need be rude. I asked a simple question and didn't think an answer would be an issue. This thread has 8 pages and I don't know where it was stated where the line came from
No need be rude. I asked a simple question and didn't think an answer would be an issue. This thread has 8 pages and I don't know where it was stated where the line came from
which is why he asked you to read the thread before asking a question that has already been asked repeatedly....
0
Quote Originally Posted by walbanger:
No need be rude. I asked a simple question and didn't think an answer would be an issue. This thread has 8 pages and I don't know where it was stated where the line came from
which is why he asked you to read the thread before asking a question that has already been asked repeatedly....
Thanks jdnmoney. I'm sorry if it was already posted somewhere. I appreciate the fact that you can respond to my question without an insult, which is more than I can say for some people. This is just the type of thing that makes sports forums unpleasant. There are just so many rude people in these forums that jump at the chance to insult others. Anyways, I'm glad you got such a good line and the reason I was asking was not because I doubted you, but to take a look at that sportsbook myself.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:
Betonline.ag
Thanks jdnmoney. I'm sorry if it was already posted somewhere. I appreciate the fact that you can respond to my question without an insult, which is more than I can say for some people. This is just the type of thing that makes sports forums unpleasant. There are just so many rude people in these forums that jump at the chance to insult others. Anyways, I'm glad you got such a good line and the reason I was asking was not because I doubted you, but to take a look at that sportsbook myself.
I about jumped out of my skivvies when i saw this like. La tech will look much better in week 2. And dont be shocked if Lamar scores 14+. I think lalala tech will explode here. 42-17 tech wins
OVER 45
Hope you all didn't miss the boat. This total is not able to be purchased a o/u 62.5!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:
ADDING***
Lamar vs La Tech over 45.
2units
I about jumped out of my skivvies when i saw this like. La tech will look much better in week 2. And dont be shocked if Lamar scores 14+. I think lalala tech will explode here. 42-17 tech wins
OVER 45
Hope you all didn't miss the boat. This total is not able to be purchased a o/u 62.5!!!
I about jumped out of my skivvies when i saw this like. La tech will look much better in week 2. And dont be shocked if Lamar scores 14+. I think lalala tech will explode here. 42-17 tech wins
OVER 45
Hope you all didn't miss the boat. This total is now able to be purchased at o/u 62.5!!!
0
Week 2 Card *Updated*
Wake +4.5
Buffalo vs Baylor over 64
Temple vs Houston under 67.5
San Jose state +25.5
Wyoming -20
Navy vs Indiana over 65 MONSTER PLAY 4units
OK St vs UTSA over 60 2u
Toledo +17.5
Lamar vs La Tech over 45 2u
**FAU vs ECU over 54.5**
From two days ago...
ADDING***
Lamar vs La Tech over 45.
2units
I about jumped out of my skivvies when i saw this like. La tech will look much better in week 2. And dont be shocked if Lamar scores 14+. I think lalala tech will explode here. 42-17 tech wins
OVER 45
Hope you all didn't miss the boat. This total is now able to be purchased at o/u 62.5!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.