Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: HFA and revenge, 2 sharp angles older than the Windows 95 you're still using. It's the playoffs, both teams will have all their chips pushed in. Those 2 angles, plus the ol' 'west coast team playing 1:00 on the east coast'. Great insider info when these things are pointed out, I'm sure the line-makers failed to account for them
And the line opened 2! I think we got a false fav on our hands but what do I know?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: HFA and revenge, 2 sharp angles older than the Windows 95 you're still using. It's the playoffs, both teams will have all their chips pushed in. Those 2 angles, plus the ol' 'west coast team playing 1:00 on the east coast'. Great insider info when these things are pointed out, I'm sure the line-makers failed to account for them
And the line opened 2! I think we got a false fav on our hands but what do I know?
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: Guess me and Billy gonna be only ones on Cincy The Titans are 4-1 vs sagarin top 10 teams. 8-2 vs top 16. Bengals 1-2, 2-3 But I favor Burrow over Tanny. My biggest problem in backing Cincy is that their D line is so bad, and they're banged up. Check the injury report. The Raiders could of ran for 200 if they just handed off the rock, 14 carries vs 54 pass attempts was a poor formula vs a talented young secondary. The Titans don't only get King Henry back, but their fullback. I gotta check to make sure. Mike Vrabel is 4-0 ats off a bye. I don't see him screwing the pooch. Only Tanny could screw this up imo.
Compelling stuff there Sac lets see where the # goes. I will say this bout the Bengals i get the sense they are a confident team without fear, and Tenny's offense while steady is not explosive. jmo
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: Guess me and Billy gonna be only ones on Cincy The Titans are 4-1 vs sagarin top 10 teams. 8-2 vs top 16. Bengals 1-2, 2-3 But I favor Burrow over Tanny. My biggest problem in backing Cincy is that their D line is so bad, and they're banged up. Check the injury report. The Raiders could of ran for 200 if they just handed off the rock, 14 carries vs 54 pass attempts was a poor formula vs a talented young secondary. The Titans don't only get King Henry back, but their fullback. I gotta check to make sure. Mike Vrabel is 4-0 ats off a bye. I don't see him screwing the pooch. Only Tanny could screw this up imo.
Compelling stuff there Sac lets see where the # goes. I will say this bout the Bengals i get the sense they are a confident team without fear, and Tenny's offense while steady is not explosive. jmo
The one thing I haven't looked at is who will cover Chase? That dude is a game changer. Vrabel comes from the Belichick tree where taking away a teams best weapon is on top of the priority list. I'd expect a double team.
0
@Biscuiteater1
The one thing I haven't looked at is who will cover Chase? That dude is a game changer. Vrabel comes from the Belichick tree where taking away a teams best weapon is on top of the priority list. I'd expect a double team.
Burrow put up 50 ppg @LSU in his last year there...
teams home in this round off the bye is a big advantage...
I'm not breaking your balls, but you often reference a players stats from college. College stats have absolutely no bearing on an NFL game. None. Nada. Zip. Did it help the Shrimp this year that LJ "didn't run the option at Louisville"?
As for teams coming off of a bye, since 1990 when they expanded to 12 teams in the playoffs , teams coming off the bye are 53% ATS. The proverbial kissing your sister
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84:
Burrow put up 50 ppg @LSU in his last year there...
teams home in this round off the bye is a big advantage...
I'm not breaking your balls, but you often reference a players stats from college. College stats have absolutely no bearing on an NFL game. None. Nada. Zip. Did it help the Shrimp this year that LJ "didn't run the option at Louisville"?
As for teams coming off of a bye, since 1990 when they expanded to 12 teams in the playoffs , teams coming off the bye are 53% ATS. The proverbial kissing your sister
Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken: @Hugh_Jorgan Hugh---I'm in the running if there's a Gus Frerotte Award. I think we should have one. Still enough points available for you to get back in it. I have already been awarded the Ryan Leaf trophy, as the most over hyped, least effective participant
Look, at 30-1 I didn't overpromise. But I have probably outperformed what anybody thought would happen.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken: @Hugh_Jorgan Hugh---I'm in the running if there's a Gus Frerotte Award. I think we should have one. Still enough points available for you to get back in it. I have already been awarded the Ryan Leaf trophy, as the most over hyped, least effective participant
Look, at 30-1 I didn't overpromise. But I have probably outperformed what anybody thought would happen.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.