Adding........
CM-650 ingame line
26 to win 4
Adding........
CM-650 ingame line
26 to win 4
Adding........
CM-650 ingame line
26 to win 4
Just following the numbers.
Lets keep this thing rolling.
I am going to do a 3 or 4 team release together for Saturday before I leave Friday so that people can make up parlays if they want to tail.
Just following the numbers.
Lets keep this thing rolling.
I am going to do a 3 or 4 team release together for Saturday before I leave Friday so that people can make up parlays if they want to tail.
SOME PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND. If you have the bankroll you can do this. What's the main advantage the books have on you???? The line.... thats what makes betting on sports hard. It's that simple. All hes doing is eliminating the books advantage. I know the risk reward sucks but if your smart and DISCIPLINED it works.
SOME PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND. If you have the bankroll you can do this. What's the main advantage the books have on you???? The line.... thats what makes betting on sports hard. It's that simple. All hes doing is eliminating the books advantage. I know the risk reward sucks but if your smart and DISCIPLINED it works.
gl I'll be watching your streak... I predicted the score of the c mich toledo game at 31-13... so your streak should be safe if that hits anywhere close.
LOL....Good call.
And we have another half to play.
gl I'll be watching your streak... I predicted the score of the c mich toledo game at 31-13... so your streak should be safe if that hits anywhere close.
LOL....Good call.
And we have another half to play.
SOME PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND. If you have the bankroll you can do this. What's the main advantage the books have on you???? The line.... thats what makes betting on sports hard. It's that simple. All hes doing is eliminating the books advantage. I know the risk reward sucks but if your smart and DISCIPLINED it works.
I am confused why people think they donthave the bankroll for this.
If you have your unit at $100 you would be up over $13000. If your unit is $50 you would be up over $6500, and finally if your unit is only $10 you would be up over $1300.
It all relative.
SOME PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND. If you have the bankroll you can do this. What's the main advantage the books have on you???? The line.... thats what makes betting on sports hard. It's that simple. All hes doing is eliminating the books advantage. I know the risk reward sucks but if your smart and DISCIPLINED it works.
I am confused why people think they donthave the bankroll for this.
If you have your unit at $100 you would be up over $13000. If your unit is $50 you would be up over $6500, and finally if your unit is only $10 you would be up over $1300.
It all relative.
I am confused why people think they donthave the bankroll for this.
If you have your unit at $100 you would be up over $13000. If your unit is $50 you would be up over $6500, and finally if your unit is only $10 you would be up over $1300.
It all relative.
I am confused why people think they donthave the bankroll for this.
If you have your unit at $100 you would be up over $13000. If your unit is $50 you would be up over $6500, and finally if your unit is only $10 you would be up over $1300.
It all relative.
First I would disagree with that assumption. I happen to know guys on here that play much more than that.
It really doesnt matter........... You can scale it back as far as you want....your unit could be $5 if you like.
Nevermind.................Im geting a headache trying to explain.
Back to the game
First I would disagree with that assumption. I happen to know guys on here that play much more than that.
It really doesnt matter........... You can scale it back as far as you want....your unit could be $5 if you like.
Nevermind.................Im geting a headache trying to explain.
Back to the game
2nd half -350?
AJ.... I would rather hammer an ingame line on the ML then to try to grab the game fresh for the second half.
I actually think the scoring is going to slow down a bit and CM will work the clock a bit IMO.
2nd half -350?
AJ.... I would rather hammer an ingame line on the ML then to try to grab the game fresh for the second half.
I actually think the scoring is going to slow down a bit and CM will work the clock a bit IMO.
First I would disagree with that assumption. I happen to know guys on here that play much more than that.
It really doesnt matter........... You can scale it back as far as you want....your unit could be $5 if you like.
Nevermind.................Im geting a headache trying to explain.
Back to the game
First I would disagree with that assumption. I happen to know guys on here that play much more than that.
It really doesnt matter........... You can scale it back as far as you want....your unit could be $5 if you like.
Nevermind.................Im geting a headache trying to explain.
Back to the game
AJ.... I would rather hammer an ingame line on the ML then to try to grab the game fresh for the second half.
I actually think the scoring is going to slow down a bit and CM will work the clock a bit IMO.
Thanks for a civil response. I agree.
Don't give a shit what people say about you, your posting WINNERS. Samurai Mike would love you!
AJ.... I would rather hammer an ingame line on the ML then to try to grab the game fresh for the second half.
I actually think the scoring is going to slow down a bit and CM will work the clock a bit IMO.
Thanks for a civil response. I agree.
Don't give a shit what people say about you, your posting WINNERS. Samurai Mike would love you!
"Giving something back"
Thought I would take time to share a few of the things I look at while entering numbers into my formulas. As I look at these I am noticing that there are ways to implement them as ATS plays or for totals.
Random order here.
* Teams that control the TOP (time of possession) by 65% or more are more likely to win that not.
* Teams that win the TO (turnover battle) win at a 80% clip
* Teams that have a QB that passes at a completion rating of 60% or higher have a greater chance of winning
* Teams that hold opponenets to a 40% or lower 3rd down rating win more.
* Teams that pickup their own 3rd downs at 45% clip have the advantage
* Teams that have been favorites AND have covered their spreads along with winning straight up and have a 70% ATS record are far greater ML plays
* Teams that have been 500 or greater against non-conf foes and are 70% winners SU in their con. have a greater likelihood of winning straightup.
There are more but I justthought that I would like to share a couple.
For the guys that dont play ML's I have made some observations over the years.....
Games that score 80% of the total's points in the first half alone are more likely to go under in the second half especially if the book brings in the total anywhere close to half the original total. Reverse works as well....if there is only 20% of the total...look at the over. Basketball is notorious for this.
Home teams that are small favorites (-.5....-2.5) are more likely to lose ATS and SU. Simple rule figuring in that homefield is worth 3+. They are basically telling you that on a neutral field the other team would be favored.
If you donthave DonBestDBS2K.....GET IT....it is worth the $500 a month....Totals that open up and have a 3-6 point move in the first 24hours are 85% winners.
Just some things to think about.
"Giving something back"
Thought I would take time to share a few of the things I look at while entering numbers into my formulas. As I look at these I am noticing that there are ways to implement them as ATS plays or for totals.
Random order here.
* Teams that control the TOP (time of possession) by 65% or more are more likely to win that not.
* Teams that win the TO (turnover battle) win at a 80% clip
* Teams that have a QB that passes at a completion rating of 60% or higher have a greater chance of winning
* Teams that hold opponenets to a 40% or lower 3rd down rating win more.
* Teams that pickup their own 3rd downs at 45% clip have the advantage
* Teams that have been favorites AND have covered their spreads along with winning straight up and have a 70% ATS record are far greater ML plays
* Teams that have been 500 or greater against non-conf foes and are 70% winners SU in their con. have a greater likelihood of winning straightup.
There are more but I justthought that I would like to share a couple.
For the guys that dont play ML's I have made some observations over the years.....
Games that score 80% of the total's points in the first half alone are more likely to go under in the second half especially if the book brings in the total anywhere close to half the original total. Reverse works as well....if there is only 20% of the total...look at the over. Basketball is notorious for this.
Home teams that are small favorites (-.5....-2.5) are more likely to lose ATS and SU. Simple rule figuring in that homefield is worth 3+. They are basically telling you that on a neutral field the other team would be favored.
If you donthave DonBestDBS2K.....GET IT....it is worth the $500 a month....Totals that open up and have a 3-6 point move in the first 24hours are 85% winners.
Just some things to think about.
something else I gathered while browsing this thread...not one of the Covers "old timers" have said a word in here. Pre 2008 join date.
I'm talking well known members here...not pepperdik. You guys know who I'm talking about.
something else I gathered while browsing this thread...not one of the Covers "old timers" have said a word in here. Pre 2008 join date.
I'm talking well known members here...not pepperdik. You guys know who I'm talking about.
Here are my 4 locks(3*), 4 Super Locks (5*) and my College FB top play of the day (10*) for this Saturday:
LOCKS SUPER LOCKS
Mizzou +2.5 Oregon St -10
Illinois -4 Georgia Tech -10
Texas -25.5 LSU -24.5
UCLA -18 UL Monroe -21
TOP PLAY OF THE WEEK..........BOISE -28!!!
Here are my 4 locks(3*), 4 Super Locks (5*) and my College FB top play of the day (10*) for this Saturday:
LOCKS SUPER LOCKS
Mizzou +2.5 Oregon St -10
Illinois -4 Georgia Tech -10
Texas -25.5 LSU -24.5
UCLA -18 UL Monroe -21
TOP PLAY OF THE WEEK..........BOISE -28!!!
Wow, I just stumbled upon this thread and skimmed through the good parts, lol. Seems to be a whole lot of animosity toward you, but I don't really understand it.
What you are doing is taking alot of the guess work out of sports betting and isnt that the point of betting to win. If I could sign up to win every game I played Id do it in a heartbeat.
That being said, not everyone can really afford to do what your doing, as it takes a pretty healthy bankroll to bet with the enormous odds that you are. But the point is to win money, and if you have money to invest, with little risk and after enough winners a pretty healthy reward, it seems like a pretty sound plan.
You seem to do pretty well for yourself so it seems like you have the bankroll to back it, and now that you have rattled off so many winners, a bad loss would not even kill you.
Nice strategy and good luck, keep winning.
Wow, I just stumbled upon this thread and skimmed through the good parts, lol. Seems to be a whole lot of animosity toward you, but I don't really understand it.
What you are doing is taking alot of the guess work out of sports betting and isnt that the point of betting to win. If I could sign up to win every game I played Id do it in a heartbeat.
That being said, not everyone can really afford to do what your doing, as it takes a pretty healthy bankroll to bet with the enormous odds that you are. But the point is to win money, and if you have money to invest, with little risk and after enough winners a pretty healthy reward, it seems like a pretty sound plan.
You seem to do pretty well for yourself so it seems like you have the bankroll to back it, and now that you have rattled off so many winners, a bad loss would not even kill you.
Nice strategy and good luck, keep winning.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.