All Forums | Penalty Box

SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 73180
Posts: 3208
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #351
Da Bears +3.5
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #352
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

Ok go ask the mods why Hugh is here if you refuse to believe me

Then get back to me...

The reason I am here is because your fellow completely-biased-liberal-lunatic doesn't care for me. 

No need to ask "the mods" ... there's only one mod who puts me in here all the time. 

The both of you can kiss my asss 
bigreds daddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #353
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


The reason I am here is because your fellow completely-biased-liberal-lunatic doesn't care for me. 

No need to ask "the mods" ... there's only one mod who puts me in here all the time. 

The both of you can kiss my asss 

I like Wall Street. 

And you just made a dud of the MNF game so much more interesting.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #354
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

Olympic qualifier ping-pong? Fact is, net sports don't translate well to a contest like this. Baseball either. Football and basketball because you go -110 bets across the board. A more thought out way for this contest to proceed would've been hypothetical bankroll, winner has the most loot. Then you could've bet tennis, soccer...UFC...WWF...whatever. You guys went for it in the simplest terms and I respect it. Makes it easier for the rest of us following in. May the best man (or whomever sucks the least, as it may be) win. Right now it's anybody's game.

By the way Stump, what you just noted applies to my record.

So many posters use units and that is their right.

OF COURSE my bet amounts vary (POY's, LARGE, etc) but so the bettor knows I'm never going to Martingale, or just bet enough to get myself out of a hole, I post WL only. And I ran the contest the same way. And they both accepted as is and I couldn't be happier. 20 games from now we'll see who pays the pied piper.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 3267
Posted: #355
Hugh is now -210 fav to win this contest.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #356
Quote Originally Posted by chaloots:

Hugh is now -210 fav to win this contest.
(Jerome, I know. I know...!)

Yeah sure. He's how many games up in the loss column?

They literally cover coin flip games. .5 here. 1 point there.

The 95 yard double-targeting 1am cover by Packers was the biggest lockbox cover of the year by far.

This one of course covers by .5. Hugh was probably peering from underneath his bedsheets watching the game in fear, getting up only to adjust the rabbit ears with tin foil for better reception.

Meanwhile, Scals wins? 

Boise -7. 24-7 Final 10 pts over the spread.
Wisconsin -10 38-17 Final. 11 pts over the spread.

These guys? Their margins of victory are thinner than Charlotte's Web.

And Scal? He's got a can of Raid bigger than an Exxon Valdez tanker...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2016
Posts: 1224
Posted: #357
Quote Originally Posted by GimmeMoneyNow:


Too much "White Privilege" in that sport for Scal.....




LMFAO
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33023
Posted: #358
Scal - A win is a win, if it's by a half a point or 20 points. 
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #359
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:


Good luck with your play Hugh 


bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #360
Quote Originally Posted by Jeromewdetroit:

Respect Hugh for stepping up against scal. Good work brother.

bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #361
Quote Originally Posted by chaloots:

Hugh is now -210 fav to win this contest.

That was the opening line ...

and then scal's "legions of followers and silent lurkers" pounded the line down to -209.5

Current line is upwards of -400 
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #362
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

 

This one of course covers by .5. Hugh was probably peering from underneath his bedsheets watching the game in fear, getting up only to adjust the rabbit ears with tin foil for better reception.



Actually, I was asleep at halftime 

I have come to the conclusion that you have purposely taken on the persona of one of your WWE villains, as it appears that even you have tired of your normal boorish personality.

Whichever villain whose persona you have borrowed from must also have been mildly retarded, as some of the crap that you write is beyond stupid.

Do you think if last nights line was +2.5, instead of +3.5, that I would have still picked Chic???

Stop whining, stop crying, stop making excuses, and just keep the records 
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #363
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

Scal - A win is a win, if it's by a half a point or 20 points. 

Well, not really ...

According to scal's recording keeping, when "more parlays than I can count" all lose because HRC lost the election, that does NOT count, but when some insignificant political prop bet wins at -150, that DOES count.

The world according to scal 
bigreds daddy
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33023
Posted: #364
 Good point Hugh 
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #365
Still, even more references to the black male genetalia...

Incredible secret and salacious desires raging in the underbelly of this thread...

You'll have plenty of extra time to explore this new found passion soon enough Packers....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 2874
Posted: #366
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

 

I have come to the conclusion that you have purposely taken on the persona of one of your WWE villains, as it appears that even you have tired of your normal boorish personality.

Whichever villain whose persona you have borrowed from must also have been mildly retarded, as some of the crap that you write is beyond stupid.


With each passing game, Scal is becoming less Poet Laureate "The Genius" Leapin' Lanny Poffo and more Scal "The Animal" Steele.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WZjOdKsiOg

How much longer before his posts simply consist of:

HUGH - BAD!!!!!
PACKERS - MEAN!!!!!

and then the muffled sounds of him shredding yet another losing ticket with his teeth.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #367
I actually did NOT bring up a black man's penis.

I was speaking of my own manhood (which is of course, not a black penis).

Hugh brought it up originally. And then you aggressively tailed him in attitude and salivating typed word...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #368
It's remarkable how often losing bets are brought up.

It's like yelling to a baseball player, "Hey you only get a hit 35% of the time you loser!"

And these are supposed to be....cappers...yeah sure.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20830
Posted: #369
All three of you are obsessed with the black penis. And this whole contest, and all of these racial/political arguments that exist on this site, all boil down to an obsession with the black phallus. Atleast Scal has an interest, and a perceived kinship, to black people in general whereas most of you are only obsessed with the d*cks. This site, and the world, is full of penis envy. That's why you guys spout so much racist sh*t. That's why Hugh spends so much time talking about black dongs, schlongs, and dilly's but tries to project it onto Scal. I bet a good 50% of you who post negative sh*t about black people on covers in one window probably has some kind of "blacks on blondes" pornography going on in the next window. Scal, on the other hand, is probably rocking white dudes banging black chicks. Who's more of a creep?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 26914
Posted: #370
I have asian chicks catapulting minnows out of their clams.  what does that make me?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #371
Pending picks:

Pick #7-

Tennessee -2.5 over South Carolina

Pick #8

Houston Astros to win ALCS -103
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #372
That's where me and Stump will always agree.


Covers is littered with black male penis envy. And it's a site of 99% white male. Whether it be actually guy in nature or just envy, the black penis is always prominent in their prefrontal cortex.


The proof is in the pudding. Just read the thread. Hugh starts. Packers finishes.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20830
Posted: #373
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:

I have asian chicks catapulting minnows out of their clams.  what does that make me?

A normal white dude. As a matter of fact, let's take race out of it. Just a normal dude, D.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 58883
Posted: #374
Zero winners here.
22nd
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #375
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

All three of you are obsessed with the black penis. And this whole contest, and all of these racial/political arguments that exist on this site, all boil down to an obsession with the black phallus. Atleast Scal has an interest, and a perceived kinship, to black people in general whereas most of you are only obsessed with the d*cks. This site, and the world, is full of penis envy. That's why you guys spout so much racist sh*t. That's why Hugh spends so much time talking about black dongs, schlongs, and dilly's but tries to project it onto Scal. I bet a good 50% of you who post negative sh*t about black people on covers in one window probably has some kind of "blacks on blondes" pornography going on in the next window. Scal, on the other hand, is probably rocking white dudes banging black chicks. Who's more of a creep?

Stu, your observations are astute in as much as myself, and a few others, do reference black penis's.

So why does it seem lost on you that myself, and those few others, ONLY reference black penis while in discussion with scal?

A reasonable person would deduce that making such references while chit chatting with scal are just us taking the obvious shots.

I'm quite certain that once scal is gone from this site, all aforementioned references will disappear along with him. 

Thus, it is not so much of who says it, but more of who instigates it. 

I'm sure scal will be back to chime in on this post ...




























just as soon as he takes that black schlong out of his throat 
bigreds daddy
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.