All Forums | Penalty Box

SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 73180
Posts: 3208
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20853
Posted: #801
Ganda confronts his wife on a business trip. (Scal and I tag along)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPHQ6RPz5Zs
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 44646
Posted: #802
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


Gandhi, your desperate attempts at proving something which never happened are pathetically inept.

According to you, post #21 in your link is what exactly???

Here, I will quote what I said for you ...
"you would think he would have something better to do, like care for a loved one who is ill"

If you believe that is crossing a line, might I suggest you take your Midol and drink plenty of water to watch your menstruation cycle away.

And your reference to what DJbrow said had absolutely nothing to do with anything I said to you ... read the back and forth that he and I were having. His comment was in response to my saying that this was no longer a site that allowed certain freedoms of speech. 

My goodness, you are pathetic. 
No wonder your wife likes to travel with you 

Desperate attempt? You're so worried about what I post that you're typing at 03.00 am. Then again you have no wife, no significant other, just this board. I get it.

I didn't go sifting through a million posts for you, this one is enough, it proves what I said that you went through my posts until you found the bit about my wife's health and then kept bringing it up over and over again. You could have said "I'm enjoying that your wife is ill Ganda, and since I can't get at you with substance, I'll just use this." 
But you're a coward, and just like your racism you thinly veil what you mean and say "How's your wife's health, Ganda?" 

People can like or dislike me all they want, but everyone knows what a loser you are for having to stoop so low. As someone mentioned, you're the definition of a troll. 
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #803
Quote Originally Posted by coldsnap55:


And what is YOUR posted record in ALL SPORTS in the last 12 months?

  30% if you are lucky.... And that's being kind.



Time for you to update your baseball thread and show your brilliant capping skills on how to fade the Dodgers.




How's the s  treating you? ....Oh yeah....1 win in 9 bets. 




You should be so lucky to chase the 50% you mock.


Wow, 1-8 his last 9 NHL picks and he’s harping on others?

I’ve never had a streak that bad in my life.

Thank you for bringing some fresh perspective to the back and forth cold snap.

Boy BWS if this is true I have a shovel here. Please bury your head in the sand.


Aaaaaand look at Hugh already deflecting the accusation with preemptive excuses (the use of the word “benign” being one). So even if I post the thread here like Ganda, he’ll just circumvent responsibility like he’s doing now.

Using sick and deceased people as pawns for an insult. Granted you don’t know anyone personally but it takes a real low-life poster to go in that direction. Not surprised. Couple this with all the racist comments you have made in your posting life (that me and Ganda have seen first-hand) and you’ll understand why I am in this contest to get you off this site.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #804
Scal, post the thread that you claim to have.

I'm sure it is a baseless accusation, just as your new BFF's was.

Either post it, or STFU, you sniveling coward 
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #805
Gandhi, why is it you can't stay away from me?

That's a rhetorical question ... we both already know the answer.

Now excuse me while I make myself comfortable inside that noggin of yours 
bigreds daddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #806
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

Scal, post the thread that you claim to have.

I'm sure it is a baseless accusation, just as your new BFF's was.

Either post it, or STFU, you sniveling coward 

Just deny it first and let’s get that on the record. It will make the reality so much more impactful.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 3675
Posted: #807
What happens if the cap off ends in a draw?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #808
Not gonna happen Hockey...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 2874
Posted: #809
Man!!!

Lots of activity in the last couple of days!!!!

Anyone else here notice that when we all changed our avatars over to wrestlers that Scal's anger and frustration has gone up tenfold? Also Ganda pops in out of nowhere and starts popping off? I don't think that's a coincidence..... 
I guess if I was to start arguing with someone, I haven't been laid in forever, plus I'm under the enormous pressure of possibly witnessing my whole entire life going away on 2/4/18, AND you kept flashing me pictures of Victoria Secret models?!?!?!?!?


Something's gonna snap!!!!

So, Scal I'm going to give you & Ganda a break from all this "Beefcake" (ironically, no Brutus The Barber), and change over to an "icky" girl - but I'll keep with the wrestling theme.

Babe & Sally - The Farmer's Daughters

Anyone remember G.L.O.W.? Man, I look back fondly on those days when it was too cold or rainy to go play outside on a Saturday - so I'd turn on the T.V. It would be cartoon, cartoon, The Three Stooges.....

THEN


What's this!?!?!?!?

And if you were lucky enough to get a tag team between someone like The Farmer's Daughters vs. Hollywood & Vine.....

Better have a supply of napkins handy.....

Good Luck all! - Keep this train rolling.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 138
Posted: #810

The title of this thread should be called:

"Scal finally feeds the trolls"

 

I don't know who came up with this d*ck measuring contest you all created, but best of 20 games doesn't prove anything in that short of a span.

For years, Scal has come on here and proven himself a solid capper who provides insights and winners long term, FOR FREE. I guarantee more people come to covers to check his plays than any of you combined.

People are attacking his 50% mark like that's awful, when in reality, a lot of "professional" touts would love to have a 'down year' of 50%.

I don't understand what all the ego stroking is going on back and forth, but can someone explain to me why we're trying to get rid of the one of the reasons covers forums are still an asset?

The only reason I've been checking out covers forums for years is to see Scalabrines plays and LeagueCappers NFL plays.-Most of you try to use covers as a springboard to become tout and shill yourself as we've seen countless times on here.-

Scal, I know you hate Trump, but the one thing I'll agree with the haters is that it seems like Donald, you've let the noise get to you and finally bother you & shake your confidence; when you've had trolls for years on your threads. 

F*ck them. no one cares about them, no one cares about their plays. 

This isnt the WWE leave the league match, they'll still be people coming in to bash, make another username and continue. 

Get you swag back, a TON of football left this season, and I know a lot of supporters could use your help in the main forums, myself included. peace_5

 

To to everybody else, get a f*ckin life

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #811
And the WINNER for Covers post of the year issssssss?????



JOHNNY COVERS Post #1159 IN the Scalabrine vs. PckerBackers Cap off thread in the Penalty Box!!!!



ColdSnap comes in a close second for exhaustive investigative reporting on Hugh and BWS exposing them for the frauds they are! Take a bow Cold Snap!


Ladies and Gentlemen! Take your seats please!!! The standing O has been going on for an hour now and this contest needs to proceed!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 3675
Posted: #812
One month since contest start, avg roughly 1.5 pgs per day, just under three months to go, 120/130 pgs still to come. This thread should hit 5k posts, maybe 6k with the weeklong goodbyes.

Scal did you play vegas season win total 31.5 (ish)?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20853
Posted: #813
Quote Originally Posted by GimmeMoneyNow:

Man!!!

Lots of activity in the last couple of days!!!!

Anyone else here notice that when we all changed our avatars over to wrestlers that Scal's anger and frustration has gone up tenfold? Also Ganda pops in out of nowhere and starts popping off? I don't think that's a coincidence..... 
I guess if I was to start arguing with someone, I haven't been laid in forever, plus I'm under the enormous pressure of possibly witnessing my whole entire life going away on 2/4/18, AND you kept flashing me pictures of Victoria Secret models?!?!?!?!?


Something's gonna snap!!!!

So, Scal I'm going to give you & Ganda a break from all this "Beefcake" (ironically, no Brutus The Barber), and change over to an "icky" girl - but I'll keep with the wrestling theme.

Babe & Sally - The Farmer's Daughters

Anyone remember G.L.O.W.? Man, I look back fondly on those days when it was too cold or rainy to go play outside on a Saturday - so I'd turn on the T.V. It would be cartoon, cartoon, The Three Stooges.....

THEN


What's this!?!?!?!?

And if you were lucky enough to get a tag team between someone like The Farmer's Daughters vs. Hollywood & Vine.....

Better have a supply of napkins handy.....

Good Luck all! - Keep this train rolling.....

Well before my time. Apparently there's a TV show based on GLOW. The good ol' days when a young man had to get his jollies in relatively innocent ways. Now kids have cell phones, and tablets, with the internet. And they're seeing things adults shouldn't even see. I'll hate to see the affect this generation is gonna have on male/female (or same sex) relationships in near future generations.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 26984
Posted: #814
Deteriorated to personal attacks.

Gone from Shake and Bake

           to

Song and Dance.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #815
My anger went up tenfold because of Hugh Madoff’s fraudulence. And YOU ALL know what he’s doing so don’t play coy. In a race to 20 middling a bet is incredibly advantageous with a lead at this amount of picks left.

If GB had scored and I came on and saw he won BOTH BETS, I would have EXPLODED!

And no, GLOW wrestlers will not pacify me.


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20853
Posted: #816
Awesome Kong!
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20853
Posted: #817
Not contest picks, correct?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20853
Posted: #818
So these are contest picks? Assuming Scal's OK with the -118?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 4681
Posted: #819
I once witnessed Scal count a -126 wager on his W/L in the mains
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #820
Quote Originally Posted by coldsnap55:


And what is YOUR posted record in ALL SPORTS in the last 12 months?

  30% if you are lucky.... And that's being kind.



Time for you to update your baseball thread and show your brilliant capping skills on how to fade the Dodgers.




How's the s  treating you? ....Oh yeah....1 win in 9 bets. 




You should be so lucky to chase the 50% you mock.



Who are you?  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20853
Posted: #821
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:

I once witnessed Scal count a -126 wager on his W/L in the mains

Why wouldn't he?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #822
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


It's utterly amazing when posters hang onto one loss forever like it's their girlfriend.

For all your 14 hours of TV watching and 4 TV"s to boot, you needed to play two games where a late fumble and score + a backdoor 60 yard TD in garbage time got the win. 

In comparison, my Boise State LOSS against Wyoming looks better researched and more thoughtful in comparison to your taking two mega-favorites that backdoor covered.

I mean, at least be like me and take Missouri and drop 68 on them winning by 47. Not this 'giving posters an aneurism' public plays with mega-spreads.

Who cares anyway? It's all accompanied by 3 sentences of verbal diarrhea.  

Yeah, a 14 point favorite that SU loses is better than 2 wins.  

In scal math 1 loss > 2 wins


I figured you'd be much better at math since you spent most of your childhood counting pennies to help your parents pay off their bookies



 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #823
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:


Why wouldn't he?

Do you see the obsession Stump?

So let’s get something straight:

The ONLY reason I post a record is because as*holes like the ones in this thread DEMANDED I do it.

And also because they continually falsified my record as they continue to do till this day (like a scene out of Mean Girls. Pathetic!)

So now the obsession has gone to .15 worth of juice. Again I want to repeat that: a poster in this thread is trying to defame a write up and play for free which takes hours of research and than an hour of editing and typing all for.... ONE PLAY OUT OF HUNDREDS OF WRITE-UPS WITH 15 cents of juice over -110.

Think about that. Think about what life that person has.

As though anyone reading the play gives a fu** about .15 of juice.

But he wants to defame one play out of hundreds posted because it had an extra .15 in it.

This of course doesn’t speak to the fact of all the plays I played on the ML (Buffalo over the Pats 16-0 against Jacoby last year at +160) in the positive direction which would make a tailer far more.

What kind of fu**ing life? Correction: lack of life does someone have to have to remember one play of hundreds with .15 extra in juice which I FULLY DISCLOSED in the THREAD!

This doesn’t even speak to all the fake lines posted in the forum which help NO ONE and I always post the line at time of post to help everyone.


Bialowas, I said it before. When I’m done with these two I’m coming for your account next.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #824
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


Yeah, a 14 point favorite that SU loses is better than 2 wins.  

In scal math 1 loss > 2 wins


I figured you'd be much better at math since you spent most of your childhood counting pennies to help your parents pay off their bookies




Again you are harping on one loss from OVER A YEAR AGO. What a lack of life...incredible.

How’s those Hockey picks BWS? EMBARRASSING! 1-8 in your last nine???? Wow.

And don’t talk about my parents you dumb shi*. One is dead and the other will beat the shi* out of you.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #825
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


Again you are harping on one loss from OVER A YEAR AGO. What a lack of life...incredible.

How’s those Hockey picks BWS? EMBARRASSING! 1-8 in your last nine???? Wow.

And don’t talk about my parents you dumb shi*. One is dead and the other will beat the shi* out of you.

Harping on your first epic MELTDOWN loss...  only to be followed by other classics like San Diego State/Wyoming and the laughably hysterical Thanksgiving gift to Covers of Arkansas @ Missouri.  Those were the ones that began your downward spiral, where proving the trolls wrong became more important than anything.  You have run the gamut of excuses in the past 12 months, even going as far as blaming your own write ups for costing you a better line.   

Hockey is 1-7-1 actually...  Coldsnap's math is as good as yours I guess.   Two peas in a pod you two are, but at least you have the balls to make picks unlike that coward.   And that sad record has all been done without "taking a break if this one loses" or "bankroll on the line" or "high volume vs. low volume" involved like your sorry @ss.   

For you to call something embarrassing is laughable...   shall I remind you of your Lakers tanking angle?  0-4 right there.      


I'll talk about your parents, your cousins, your cats or whatever the hell I want to talk about.  











All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.