All Forums | Penalty Box

SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 73180
Posts: 3208
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1326
ColdSnapoh baby what a post!


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 3675
Posted: #1327
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


Perfect call Hugh...   Denver was the right side without a doubt.   You just can't cap 5 turnovers    

True.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #1328
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


Perfect call Hugh...   Denver was the right side without a doubt.   You just can't cap 5 turnovers    

I had that game capped to perfection!

No one could have capped 5 turnovers.

No one could have capped a coach not staying with his ground game and allowing an inept QB to throw the ball.

Not a single poster came in this thread to dispute my cap of this game.

Let any person come in here right now and proclaim that they had properly capped the Chiefs covering last night.

Let any person come in here and say that they had capped there being 5 turnovers.

Where is that person? 
Nowhere, because when Hugh posts a pick the trolls cower in fear.

Hugh moves lines. 

Hugh NEVER caps a game wrong

  
bigreds daddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 26914
Posted: #1329
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


I had that game capped to perfection!

No one could have capped 5 turnovers.

No one could have capped a coach not staying with his ground game and allowing an inept QB to throw the ball.

Not a single poster came in this thread to dispute my cap of this game.

Let any person come in here right now and proclaim that they had properly capped the Chiefs covering last night.

Let any person come in here and say that they had capped there being 5 turnovers.

Where is that person? 
Nowhere, because when Hugh posts a pick the trolls cower in fear.

Hugh moves lines. 

Hugh NEVER caps a game wrong

  


ok, now this is pretty funny.  I bet even Scal had a little ...........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avYnhH95u_0
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1330
Who said I disagreed with BWS in saying you can’t cap 5 turnovers??? 

Never said UNM was the right side. I said I had the right CAP. And Hugh had that pathetic post on the previous page where 3 of 4 posters were trolls writing “auot-fade” or something thereof and he uses their posts to say “others were on the game.”

This is how someone his age argues intelligently?

The 4th crusher was beat to the punch in the OP not to use “Laramie” as a counter and then he uses “homecoming” something I told him.

Think about that. Hugh uses Holdat, a trolls who’s been in threads beyond count, as a LEGTIMATE poster who was on the other side when he types “auto-fade.”

This guy would get roundly laughed out of a debate hall if he ever came within a 1,000 miles of one.

Having said that BWS initial statement is TRUE about the turnovers. So the Lol’s make you look even worse.

But really, I’ve NEVER started a season 1-9. That’s incredible. So consider the source.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1331
Oh and my team had 7 turnovers (40% more) so my argument holds even MORE water (all while abandoning a long standing team identity).
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #1332
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

ColdSnapoh baby what a post!



1-9-1 betting on Moneyline dogs and parlays...  record doesn't matter there 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #1333
scal...  when you leave this site in a few months I recommend you try RxForum or SBR and not Twitter...  

Only pure losers leave Covers for Twitter as shown in this link here

https://twitter.com/coldsnap55
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52832
Posted: #1334
Someone who has already locked in 2 very precious picks trusting a garbage team like Purdue, and a coinflip game with Colorado State, with a 6-7 record and sinking, sure has found some chutzpah this morning...you will not overcome your historical sample size as a 40% lifetime capper...thus reaching 10 just to tie Hugh is simply an impossibility, and I have a few special Voodoo Tricks for you left if you do indeed reach 8...Scal...youre done...sooner you accept it, the less suffering you put yourself thru without cause
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #1335
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:

Someone who has already locked in 2 very precious picks trusting a garbage team like Purdue, and a coinflip game with Colorado State, with a 6-7 record and sinking, sure has found some chutzpah this morning...you will not overcome your historical sample size as a 40% lifetime capper...thus reaching 10 just to tie Hugh is simply an impossibility, and I have a few special Voodoo Tricks for you left if you do indeed reach 8...Scal...youre done...sooner you accept it, the less suffering you put yourself thru without cause


He gets all tingly when his little troll Coldsnap chimes in.  Ironic because Coldsnap is exactly everything that scal hates...  no contributions, no picks, no write ups, left Covers for Twitter when everyone was making fun of him.  But since he takes scal's side it's all good to him.  More proof of scal's massive hypocrisy.  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52832
Posted: #1336
If covers was more european based, coldsnap would be quite the legend here...the guy is a sharp bettor when it comes to golf in all the years ive seen his plays.
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1337
See but I wanted to add the fact is Hugh capped....nothing.

At least not in evidence. He provided ...zilch.

So how do you defend a win or a loss?

It’s all just....poof. Nothingness. Lose win, win lose. Like Packers, a binary capper. A series of L’s and W’s sequences with the pitter latter of your fingertips.

So the BWS defense is invalidated, at least in this case, unless of course Hugh has a write up out there we all didn’t see (lol).


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #1338
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:

If covers was more european based, coldsnap would be quite the legend here...the guy is a sharp bettor when it comes to golf in all the years ive seen his plays.

That's why he only posts a few golf bets...   1 win covers many many many many many losses.   Throw enough darts and you're bound to hit the bullseye.   Plus it's not too hard to tail jmitseff...  even I hit on his plays.   
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1339
BWS have enough guys to be on Wyoming before you rag on picks before they happen.

I’ve faded Packers here. He’s faded me. At least that is putting something up saying you’ll lose.

You are NOT on Wyoming this week. So cut the shi*. And the only reason you’d say it’s a no play is because IM ON IT.

It is not a no play. I have a lot to say about it but I’m suspended from the mains.

Now if you watched the MWC like you say you do you’d know all the problems WY has this year starting with the QB on down. So please STFU with the going somewhere. I’m going nowhere. I will win.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52832
Posted: #1340
Post 1342...i am a tennis capper...thats my bread and butter...always was always will be...and yes when i have time, desire, good information or feel, i post insightful writeups whenever its warranted.
Perhaps you dont realize capping tennis is a daily thing with one days worth turnaround...you cap football i get it...you have a week, or more with your look ahead lines, to cap a game...so obviously you are an attention seeker and will post a novel and call it a write up...and hype it for days on end...you get wood when you see your thread views increase by the 100s....i couldnt care less...the quality of banter i engage in here with fellow tennis cappers puts your threads and conversations to shame.
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #1341
holy sh*t, what is this thread?  wait, i don't want to know.  but why is hugh jorman referred to as hugh madoff?


interestingly, i saw madoff the other day.  he seems to be doing well, all things considered.  i'll see if  can get his best bet next time i see him.  i heard his favorite team is dallas even though he's from new york.  you guys know anyone else like that?    
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52832
Posted: #1342
In 2005, Scal invested half of his sports wagering roll ($500) with Bernie...he was promised excellent capping returns and the art of the pitch (aka "the sports capping "writeup")...well 6 months later, Scal went 40% on all wagers and eventually went broke...hes had it in for Bernie Madoff ever since.
I suppose as this cap off evolved, Scal realized he will lose to Hugh, and now hes simply transferring his decade long hatred towards Madoff onto Hugh.
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52832
Posted: #1343
Hello Clubdirt...welcome to the best current place on covers...I am Packers...aka the peoples champ Pack 


Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 26932
Posted: #1344
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

holy sh*t, what is this thread?  wait, i don't want to know.  but why is hugh jorman referred to as hugh madoff?


interestingly, i saw madoff the other day.  he seems to be doing well, all things considered.  i'll see if  can get his best bet next time i see him.  i heard his favorite team is dallas even though he's from new york.  you guys know anyone else like that?    

Isn't he stil doing a 100+ ? Hugh has probably equalled that here.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 3675
Posted: #1345
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

See but I wanted to add the fact is Hugh capped....nothing.

At least not in evidence. He provided ...zilch.

So how do you defend a win or a loss?

It’s all just....poof. Nothingness. Lose win, win lose. Like Packers, a binary capper. A series of L’s and W’s sequences with the pitter latter of your fingertips.

So the BWS defense is invalidated, at least in this case, unless of course Hugh has a write up out there we all didn’t see (lol).



Hughs followers, possibly numbering in the thousands, trust that hugh has done his due diligence prior to posting. Therby rendering the write up moot. 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 58651
Posted: #1346
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

Oh and my team had 7 turnovers (40% more) so my argument holds even MORE water (all while abandoning a long standing team identity).
Were you aware of Wyoming's rank in the nation in  takeaways before that game? 
No way? Way
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #1347
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:

In 2005, Scal invested half of his sports wagering roll ($500) with Bernie...he was promised excellent capping returns and the art of the pitch (aka "the sports capping "writeup")...well 6 months later, Scal went 40% on all wagers and eventually went broke...hes had it in for Bernie Madoff ever since.
I suppose as this cap off evolved, Scal realized he will lose to Hugh, and now hes simply transferring his decade long hatred towards Madoff onto Hugh.



so what's at stake here?  this is way too long for me to go back and try to get any answers.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #1348
Quote Originally Posted by lbcake:


Isn't he stil doing a 100+ ? Hugh has probably equalled that here.


he's doing a lot of time.  he's going to need to be reincarnated once or twice to get it all done.

he's at a federal prison in butner, nc.  the law offices of cds also has a client inmate there.  quite a famous case.  someone at the bbc has called me once or twice about it.  anyway, i was walking through the prison to meet my guy and my escort told me madoff was over there.  he was just in the courtyard reading a book.  apparently, he's a very pleasant inmate.  nothing too interesting.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1349
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

holy sh*t, what is this thread?  wait, i don't want to know.  but why is hugh jorman referred to as hugh madoff?


interestingly, i saw madoff the other day.  he seems to be doing well, all things considered.  i'll see if  can get his best bet next time i see him.  i heard his favorite team is dallas even though he's from new york.  you guys know anyone else like that?    

Club let me help you out with that. 

And just to add validity to what I say, I'd love to see Hugh try to refute any of. this. If he does, you can easily go back and see what he did yourself.

So I started a capping contest with Packers, because he is the second biggest troll on this site (Hugh #1) and I wanted him off the site. So we both agreed to put our accounts up (after some bickering where Packers wanted me to bet ONLY Tennis, his best sport, But that is old news now).

So the OP is clear. I'm not going to write 10,000 rules for this contest given, even though they are trolls I trust them as cappers to play it straight up.

So Packers is 9-9 thus far and I have zero complaints on any of his picks. And he will say the same of me.

So in the middle of all this Hugh offered to take the bet as well, so I have to beat both of them separately. I'm fine with that.

Now, Hugh took the Packers +6 over the Saints two weeks ago.

I left for the day (yes I have a life) and I came back 12/16 hours later and saw that Hugh had put in a bet for Saints +3.5.

So yes, he played both sides of one game. His original binding pick lost. His pick that I most certainly wouldn't have accepted since I saw it, won. 

Hugh's reason for taking both sides? He was trying to middle the game.

Now in the normal course of betting with a book there is a penalty for that if you lose. It's juice.

In this contest there is no juice.

Now Hugh is 58. We know that he knows just on the basis of not paying juice, he's at an advantage. Since it's a risk free bet.

But you say, "Scal, he's also taking a loss!" Yes he is. But the problem is he was UP in the contest. 

So let's say you are 8-11 in a race to 20 and I'm 9-9. I can lock up the contest playing both sides of one game. No risk. I finish 10-10 and you cannot win.

So on this fact alone, at any point, I was trusting no one would do such a thing. There is quite an advantage to doing it when you are up in a contest with a capped total of picks at 20.  

Did Packers do it? No. He knows that I know he shouldn't be doing it.

So that's #1.

#2 is that Hugh took a reduced juice line from 5Dimes for his second pick.

It was the Stros +.5 runs 5 inning line (which was NOT -110 with REGULAR juice) in game 4. Anyone playing that bet expects a pitcher's duel.

The Dodgers were up 4-0 in the top 4th so he's dead right? No. Stros tied it up 4-4 with two outs in the bottom of the inning.

Dodgers go up 7-4 in the top of the 5th he's dead right? No, in the bottom of the inning 2 strikes 2 outs no one on a walk happens and the Stros tie it up 7-7 and he wins that bet too.

Regardless of how that is the worst bad beat in how he won it, I NEVER expected someone to bet a reduced juice line when I said -110.

So in SHORT (Cliffnotes):

1 pick he bet both sides of one game. So one of his wins is illegitimate and he should be 9-8. The other bet was on a game that shouldn't have been played because the price was not allowed with a site discount.

So guess what he SHOULD be: A fu**ing .500 capper. The VERY THING he disparages.

As does BWS who is 1-9 in his last 10 hockey bets.

Ain't that a BIT** reading all this? Fu**ing frauds, which is why I call his Basta*d in a Basket Hugh Madoff.

Can't even play 20 games STRAIGHT UP. Packers besides the fact he is a di**head, no complaints.

Imagine that, looking for edges when you are UP. And of course the peanut gallery of bigots here supports him, emboldening him to do it again.

A disgrace of the highest order. I let it all go and counted it all.

 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #1350
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

BWS have enough guys to be on Wyoming before you rag on picks before they happen.

I’ve faded Packers here. He’s faded me. At least that is putting something up saying you’ll lose.

You are NOT on Wyoming this week. So cut the shi*. And the only reason you’d say it’s a no play is because IM ON IT.

It is not a no play. I have a lot to say about it but I’m suspended from the mains.

Now if you watched the MWC like you say you do you’d know all the problems WY has this year starting with the QB on down. So please STFU with the going somewhere. I’m going nowhere. I will win.

I do not understand this post at all
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.